Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Shearer 1983 note independence number triangle free graphs

../

theorem_1: Shearer's independence bound α ≥ n f(d), f(d) = (d ln d - d + 1)/(d - 1)^2, for triangle-free graphs on n vertices with average degree d, with the elementary step to R(3,k) ≤ (1 + o(1)) k^2/log k that the problem pages consume.


James B. Shearer, A note on the independence number of triangle-free graphs, Discrete Mathematics 46 (1983), no. 1, 83--87, DOI 10.1016/0012-365X(83)90273-X; received 26 February 1982, revised 16 August 1982; the author at the Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley (p. 83). Cited as [Sh83] on the problem pages. Its three references (p. 87) are Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi, A dense infinite Sidon sequence, Europ. J. Combinatorics 2 (1981), printed as "1--15" (the paper's [1], the source of the bound it sharpens); Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi, A note on Ramsey numbers, J. Combin. Theory (A) 29 (1980), 354--360 (the paper's [2], the site's AKS80, filed as ajtai_1980_note_ramsey_numbers; the running head and title on printed p. 354 (PDF p. 1) match this entry, and its Theorem 2, the independence bound α(G)≥0.01(n/t)ln⁡t\alpha(G)\ge0.01(n/t)\ln t that Theorem 1 here sharpens, is on printed p. 355 (PDF p. 2), both located on the text layer on 2026-09-22 and the theorem paged on theorem_2); and Ajtai, Erdős, Komlós and Szemerédi, On Turán's theorem for sparse graphs, Combinatorica 1 (1981), 313--317 (the paper's [3], the site's AEKS81, filed as ajtai_1981_turan_s_theorem_sparse_graphs). The edition read is the publisher's version of record; no preprint or later version is known here.

The copy read for this card is the publisher's open-archive scan of the printed article: 5 pages, printed pp. 83--87 = PDF pp. 1--5 (printed p. nn is PDF p. n−82n-82), a 2002 scan (its metadata names an Acrobat Capture source and a July 2002 creation date) with an OCR text layer that locates passages and garbles the displays, subscripts, inequality signs and the function names in the formulas. Provenance: the copy was obtained on 2026-09-22 from the publisher's open archive, a free copy downloaded in a browser from the article's PDF endpoint on the publisher's site, the DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(83)90273-X resolving to the same article; 205,738 bytes. The scan prints "0012-365X/83/$3.00 © 1983, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)" on its first page (printed p. 83), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for the abstract, the introduction, Theorem 1 and its proof (p. 83 to the top of p. 84), Remark 1 and Remark 2 (p. 84), the definition (3) of F(d,T)F(d,T) and the two inequalities it satisfies (p. 84), the displayed bounds (5)--(8) and (12) (pp. 85--86), Remark 3 (pp. 86--87), Remark 4 and the closing paragraph (p. 87), each read clause by clause on the page images of PDF pp. 1--5 on 2026-09-22; the reference list (p. 87) was read on the page image. The proof of Theorem 1 (one page) was read in full on the page images and followed: the differential equation (1), the sign claims on f′f' and f′′f'' and the averaging argument for (2) were checked here, the first two numerically at sample points. The derivations of (4)--(12) (pp. 84--86) were read on the page images for structure only, and none of their steps was checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Contents

  • Abstract and introduction (p. 83, page image). The abstract announces a simple proof that a triangle-free graph on nn points with average degree dd has independence number α≥n(dln⁡d−d+1)/(d−1)2\alpha\ge n(d\ln d-d+1)/(d-1)^2, and a discussion of graphs containing a limited number of triangles. The introduction names the bound it sharpens, α>nln⁡d/(100d)\alpha>n\ln d/(100d) for d≥d0d\ge d_0, from Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi [1], and describes the note's result as slightly stronger, with a simpler proof. The paper's [1] is the Sidon sequence paper; the Ramsey note [2] is named only in the closing paragraph.
  • Theorem 1 (p. 83, quoted): "Let GG be a triangle-free graph on nn vertices with average degree dd. Let α\alpha be the independence number of GG. Let f(d)=(dln⁡d−d+1)/(d−1)2f(d)=(d\ln d-d+1)/(d-1)^2, f(0)=1f(0)=1, f(1)=12f(1)=\frac12. Then α≥nf(d)\alpha\ge nf(d)." Proof (pp. 83--84): ff is continuous on 0≤d<∞0\le d<\infty with 1>f(d)>01>f(d)>0, f′(d)<0f'(d)<0 and f′′(d)≥0f''(d)\ge0 for 0<d<∞0<d<\infty, and satisfies (1) (d+1)f(d)=1+(d−d2)f′(d)(d+1)f(d)=1+(d-d^2)f'(d). Induction on nn: the theorem holds for n≤d/f(d)n\le d/f(d), since the neighbors of any point form an independent set, so α≥d≥nf(d)\alpha\ge d\ge nf(d). For a point PP of degree d1d_1 whose neighbors have average degree d2d_2, the paper claims PP can be chosen with (2) (d1+1)f(d)≤1+(dd1+d−2d1d2)f′(d)(d_1+1)f(d)\le1+(dd_1+d-2d_1d_2)f'(d): as PP ranges over GG the average of d1d2d_1d_2 equals the average of d12d_1^2, which is at least d2d^2, so the left side of (2) averages to the left side of (1) and the right side of (2) averages to at least the right side of (1). Deleting PP and its neighbors leaves a triangle-free G′G' on n−d1−1n-d_1-1 points with 12nd−d1d2\frac12nd-d_1d_2 edges, hence average degree d′=(nd−2d1d2)/(n−d1−1)d'=(nd-2d_1d_2)/(n-d_1-1), and by induction an independent set of size (n−d1−1)f(d′)(n-d_1-1)f(d'); adding PP and using f(d′)≥f(d)+(d′−d)f′(d)f(d')\ge f(d)+(d'-d)f'(d) (from f′′≥0f''\ge0) and then (2) gives 1+(n−d1−1)f(d′)≥nf(d)1+(n-d_1-1)f(d')\ge nf(d). Paged at theorem_1.
  • Remark 1 (p. 84) reads the proof as a random greedy algorithm: choose a point PP of GG at random, put it in the independent set, delete PP with its neighbors, and repeat on what remains. Because (2) holds on average, the expected size of the independent set this produces is at least nf(d)nf(d).
  • Remark 2 (p. 84) asserts, from random graphs on nn points with average degree dd in the range n≫d≫1n\gg d\gg1, that there are triangle-free graphs on nn points with average degree dd whose independence number is at most n[2ln⁡d/d−2ln⁡ln⁡d/d+O(1/d)]n[2\ln d/d-2\ln\ln d/d+O(1/d)]. No argument is printed. Since f(d)=ln⁡d/d−1/d+O(ln⁡d/d2)f(d)=\ln d/d-1/d+O(\ln d/d^2), Theorem 1 and Remark 2 leave a factor 22 between the lower and upper bounds on the least independence number of a triangle-free graph of average degree dd; the paper says so in the form f(d)≤F(d,0)≤2ln⁡d/d+O(ln⁡ln⁡d/d)f(d)\le F(d,0)\le2\ln d/d+O(\ln\ln d/d) (p. 84).
  • Graphs with few triangles (pp. 84--86, structure only). For a graph GG, n(G)n(G), I(G)I(G), d(G)d(G) and T(G)T(G) are its number of vertices, its independence number, its average degree and the average number of triangles a vertex lies in, and (3) F(d,T)=lim inf⁡I(G)/n(G)F(d,T)=\liminf I(G)/n(G) over n(G)→∞n(G)\to\infty, d(G)→dd(G)\to d, T(G)→TT(G)\to T. Disjoint unions give the convexity inequality (4), so FF is continuous and nonincreasing in dd or TT alone. Deleting one point from each triangle gives (5) F(d,T)≥(1−13T)F(d/(1−13T),0)F(d,T)\ge(1-\frac13T)F(d/(1-\frac13T),0), a random induced subgraph gives (6) F(d,T)≥ρF(ρd,ρ2T)F(d,T)\ge\rho F(\rho d,\rho^2T) for 0≤ρ≤10\le\rho\le1, and optimizing (7) gives (8): with L=ln⁡d−12ln⁡T−1L=\ln d-\frac12\ln T-1, F(d,T)≥(1−23T)(ln⁡d−1)/dF(d,T)\ge(1-\frac23T)(\ln d-1)/d for 0≤T≤7/(4L)0\le T\le7/(4L) and F(d,T)≥L/d−12ln⁡(43eL)/dF(d,T)\ge L/d-\frac12\ln(\frac43eL)/d for 7/(4L)≤T≤e−7/2d27/(4L)\le T\le e^{-7/2}d^2 (p. 86); "Note we always have F(d,T)≥1/(d+1)F(d,T)\ge1/(d+1)." Replacing each point of a triangle-free graph by KrK_r and each edge by Kr,rK_{r,r} gives the upper bounds (9)--(11) and, with Remark 2, (12) F(d,T)≤2ln⁡d/d+O(1/d)F(d,T)\le2\ln d/d+O(1/d) for 0≤T≤d0\le T\le d and F(d,T)≤4(ln⁡d−12ln⁡T)/d+O(1/d)F(d,T)\le4(\ln d-\frac12\ln T)/d+O(1/d) for d≤T≤d2d\le T\le d^2.
  • Remark 3 (pp. 86--87). From (12), $F(d,Ad^2/(\ln d)^2)\le4(\ln d-\ln d+\frac12\ln A+\ln\ln d)/d+O(1/d) =4\ln\ln d/d+O(1/d)$, and Shearer concludes that Remark 3 of [1], which he reads as stating "in effect that there exist constants AA, BB such that F(d,Ad2/(ln⁡d)2)≥B(ln⁡d)/dF(d,Ad^2/(\ln d)^2)\ge B(\ln d)/d for d≥d0d\ge d_0", "is incorrect".
  • Remark 4 and the closing paragraph (p. 87). Remark 4 poses the open questions, quoted: "what is lim⁡d→∞dF(d,0)/ln⁡d\lim_{d\to\infty}dF(d,0)/\ln d or lim⁡d→∞F(d,d)/F(d,0)\lim_{d\to\infty}F(d,d)/F(d,0)? Also what if anything can be proven about the independence number of K4K_4-free graphs?" The closing paragraph records that Shearer found, after writing the note, two overlapping papers, [2] and [3]; it says that [3] proves that the independence number α\alpha of a KpK_p-free graph exceeds c(n/d)ln⁡(ln⁡d/p)c(n/d)\ln(\ln d/p) for p≥4p\ge4, while its authors could not decide whether α>cp(n/d)ln⁡d\alpha>c_p(n/d)\ln d holds even for p=4p=4. The paper's [3] is Theorem 2 of the 1981 paper, and the undecided question is that paper's display (3), the statement of Problem 802.
  • What the paper does not print. No Ramsey number appears in the paper. The bound R(3,k)≤(1+o(1))k2/log⁡kR(3,k)\le(1+o(1))k^2/\log k that the site and the later literature attribute to it follows from Theorem 1 by an elementary step recorded on the result page: a triangle-free graph on nn vertices with no independent set of size kk has every degree at most k−1k-1, so its average degree dd is at most k−1k-1, and since ff is decreasing, k−1≥α≥nf(d)≥nf(k−1)k-1\ge\alpha\ge nf(d)\ge nf(k-1), whence n≤(k−1)/f(k−1)=(k−2)2/(ln⁡(k−1)−1+1/(k−1))=(1+o(1))k2/ln⁡kn\le(k-1)/f(k-1)=(k-2)^2/(\ln(k-1)-1+1/(k-1))=(1+o(1))k^2/\ln k; thus R(3,k)≤(k−1)/f(k−1)+1R(3,k)\le(k-1)/f(k-1)+1.

Compiled scope

The paper is compiled at statement depth for the result the four citing problems consume: Theorem 1 (p. 83), read on the page image with its one-page proof read in full and followed, and paged with the elementary Ramsey step on theorem_1. Remarks 1--4 are recorded as statements read on the page images; Remark 2 carries no printed argument, and the derivations of (4)--(12) were read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #165: Theorem 1 (printed p. 83, PDF p. 1), the bound α≥nf(d)\alpha\ge nf(d) with f(d)=(dln⁡d−d+1)/(d−1)2f(d)=(d\ln d-d+1)/(d-1)^2 for a triangle-free graph on nn vertices with average degree dd, is the source of the upper bound R(3,k)≤(1+o(1))k2/log⁡kR(3,k)\le(1+o(1))k^2/\log k that the problem records, through the elementary step above; the paper prints the independence bound only, and the introduction (p. 83) names the bound it sharpens, α>nln⁡d/(100d)\alpha>n\ln d/(100d) for d≥d0d\ge d_0, of Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi. Remark 2 (p. 84) gives the upper bound 2ln⁡d/d2\ln d/d on the least independence ratio, a factor 22 above Theorem 1, so no bound on the independence number in terms of the average degree can bring this route's constant below 12\frac12. #553: Theorem 1 (p. 83) is the site's source for R(3,n)≪n2/log⁡nR(3,n)\ll n^2/\log n, the denominator of the ratio in the problem's statement, by the same step; the resolving paper's own input for this bound is the 1980 note, whose Theorem 2 is the bound Theorem 1 sharpens; p. 83 quotes that bound from the same authors' Sidon-sequence paper [1], not from the note. #544: Theorem 1 (p. 83) is the upper half of the order of magnitude R(3,k)≍k2/log⁡kR(3,k)\asymp k^2/\log k that the page uses to average the increments R(3,k+1)−R(3,k)R(3,k+1)-R(3,k) over long ranges. #802: Theorem 1 (p. 83) is the case r=3r=3 of the problem's statement with the explicit constant f(d)∼ln⁡d/df(d)\sim\ln d/d, the "simpler proof with a better constant" the page quotes from Alon 1996; Remark 4 (p. 87), "what if anything can be proven about the independence number of K4K_4-free graphs?", is the problem's question at r=4r=4, and the closing paragraph (p. 87) records the 1981 paper's statement that it could not decide the ln⁡d\ln d bound even at p=4p=4.

Results.

  • Theorem 1 (p. 83): a triangle-free graph on nn vertices with average degree dd has α≥nf(d)\alpha\ge nf(d), f(d)=(dln⁡d−d+1)/(d−1)2f(d)=(d\ln d-d+1)/(d-1)^2; hence R(3,k)≤(k−1)/f(k−1)+1=(1+o(1))k2/ln⁡kR(3,k)\le(k-1)/f(k-1)+1=(1+o(1))k^2/\ln k.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.