Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Conjecture (p. 117, unnumbered, quoted). After noting the gap between the bounds of Theorems 1 and 2 and guessing that the lower bound is nearer the truth, the authors write: "In fact, we conjecture that the upper bound in (2) can be replaced by (for all and ) and, perhaps, even by ." They add that they have not been able to prove this.
The bound in (2) is the bound on for a set with squarefree for all (see Theorem 2). The constant is not specified.
Proof pointer
None: the paper proves neither statement.
Read depth
Claims checked: the sentence was read on the page image of the print (p. 117). Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 give the bounds the conjecture refers to.
Source. P. Erdős and A. Sárközy, On divisibility properties of integers of the form , Acta Math. Hungar. 50 (1987), no. 1--2, 117--122, doi:10.1007/BF01903370; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 1109: the conjecture is the problem's two questions, and , as the authors posed them; the paper proves neither.