Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Theorem 1 (p. 117, quoted). "For , there exists a sequence such that (1) and is squarefree for all , ."
The condition includes , so every is squarefree as well. The threshold is not made explicit.
Proof pointer
Section 2, pp. 118--120. With the -th prime, choose so that the product of over is below and over is at least (display (3)), and let be the latter product, so . The integers that are divisible by no with fill residue classes modulo ; intersected with they give that many arithmetic progressions of difference , each of about terms. A non-squarefree term of any of them is divisible by for some , and these number fewer than in all, so one progression has fewer than of them. Between consecutive non-squarefree terms of that progression, or between one of them and an end of , lies a run of consecutive squarefree terms (all terms are even), and the set has all its pairwise sums in that run and elements (the print writes , which fails for even ; the bound is enough).
Read depth
Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page image of the print (p. 117), and the proof on pp. 118--120 was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External input: the prime number theorem.
Source. P. Erdős and A. Sárközy, On divisibility properties of integers of the form , Acta Math. Hungar. 50 (1987), no. 1--2, 117--122, doi:10.1007/BF01903370; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 1109: gives for , the lower bound the problem's estimates start from; it answers neither of the problem's questions, which ask for upper bounds.