Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

On sums of subsets of a set of integers

../

proposition_1_1: Alon and Freiman's estimates for p(n,r), the largest subset of {1,...,n} no subset sum of which is an r-th power: the asymptotic (1+o(1)) 2^{1/(r+1)} n^{(r-1)/(r+1)} for fixed r >= 6, and an upper bound n^{2/3+eps} for 2 <= r <= 5.

proposition_1_3: Alon and Freiman's analytic proposition that a subset of {1,...,n} with more than n^{2/3+eps} elements, no residue class 0 mod q holding more than x - n^{2/3} of them, has every integer within B_A of S_A as a subset sum, with (1+o(1)) 2^x e^{-(M-S_A)^2/2B_A^2}/sqrt(2 pi B_A^2) representations.

theorem_1_2: Alon and Freiman's theorem that, for every eps > 0, n > n(eps) and every m with 3n^{5/3+eps} < m < n^2/(20 log^2 n), the largest subset of {1,...,n} with no subset summing to m has floor(n/s) + s - 2 elements, where s is the least integer not dividing m.


Alon, N. and Freiman, G., On sums of subsets of a set of integers. Combinatorica 8 (4) (1988), 297-306. DOI: 10.1007/BF02189086.

Source: https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nalon/PDFS/publications.html. The scan's header reads "Akadémiai Kiadó — Springer-Verlag" and no copyright line is printed; the scan read for this card comes from the author's publications page (https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nalon/PDFS/publications.html, read 2026-10-02), which states no terms, and the publisher's article page for DOI 10.1007/BF02189086 (read 2026-10-02 through its cookie redirect) offers the PDF behind a paywall with a "Reprints and permissions" link, no Creative Commons or Open Access statement and no article-year copyright line, only the site footer "© 2026 Springer Nature", every other right reserved.

For A⊆{1,…,n}A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\} write A∗A^* for its set of subset sums. The paper's main result, Theorem 1.2 (p. 298), determines f(n,m)f(n,m), the largest size of an AA with m∉A∗m\notin A^*, as ⌊n/s⌋+s−2\lfloor n/s\rfloor+s-2 with ss the least integer not dividing mm, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, n>n(ε)n>n(\varepsilon) and 3n5/3+ε<m<n2/20log⁡2n3n^{5/3+\varepsilon}<m<n^2/20\log^2 n; the lower bound is Lemma 4.1 (p. 304), valid for every sufficiently large nn and every m≤n2m\le n^2. Proposition 1.1 (p. 298) bounds p(n,r)p(n,r), the largest size of an AA with no rr-th power in A∗A^*: p(n,r)=(1+o(1))21/(r+1)n(r−1)/(r+1)p(n,r)=(1+o(1))2^{1/(r+1)}n^{(r-1)/(r+1)} for fixed r≥6r\ge6, and p(n,r)≤n2/3+εp(n,r)\le n^{2/3+\varepsilon} for 2≤r≤52\le r\le5 and n>n0(ε)n>n_0(\varepsilon). Both rest on the analytic Proposition 1.3 (pp. 298--299): if ∣A∣=x>n2/3+ε|A|=x>n^{2/3+\varepsilon}, n>n0(ε)n>n_0(\varepsilon), and no residue class 0 mod q0\bmod q, q≥2q\ge2, holds more than x−n2/3x-n^{2/3} elements of AA, every integer within BAB_A of half the total of AA is a subset sum, with a Gaussian count of representations. Section 5 (p. 306) states, without proof, two results of Erdős and Freiman that Proposition 1.3 can prove (Propositions 5.1 and 5.2: for n=3x−3n=3x-3 large every xx-subset of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} has a power of 2 in A∗A^*, and for n>n0n>n_0, n=4x−4n=4x-4, a square-free number), and the authors' belief that p(n,r)=(1+o(1))21/(r+1)n(r−1)/(r+1)p(n,r)=(1+o(1))2^{1/(r+1)}n^{(r-1)/(r+1)} for every fixed r≥2r\ge2.

Read status: claims checked. The statements of Theorem 1.2, Lemma 4.1 and Propositions 1.1 and 1.3 were read clause by clause on the print and their proofs in Sections 2 to 4 followed; nothing is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #771: with f(n,m)f(n,m) the largest size of a set A⊆{1,…,n}A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\} no subset of which sums to mm, Theorem 1.2 (p. 298) gives f(n,m)=⌊n/s⌋+s−2f(n,m)=\lfloor n/s\rfloor+s-2, where ss is the least integer not dividing mm, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, n>n(ε)n>n(\varepsilon) and 3n5/3+ε<m<n2/20log⁡2n3n^{5/3+\varepsilon}<m<n^2/20\log^2 n. The consequence drawn on p. 298, an mm for every nn with f(n,m)=(1/2+o(1))n/log⁡nf(n,m)=(1/2+o(1))n/\log n, with the lower bound f(n,m)≥(1/2+o(1))n/log⁡nf(n,m)\ge(1/2+o(1))n/\log n for all n,mn,m that the paper credits to Erdős and Graham, verifies their conjecture, as the paper says.

Bears on. #587: Proposition 1.1(ii) with r=2r=2 (p. 298), which is (1.3) (p. 297), bounds the largest subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} with no square subset sum by N2/3+εN^{2/3+\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and N>n0(ε)N>n_0(\varepsilon); the lower bound (1.1), which the paper credits to Erdős, is (1+o(1))21/3N1/3(1+o(1))2^{1/3}N^{1/3}. The paper does not determine the order.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.