Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Velammal 1995 is binomial coefficient squarefree
main_theorem: Velammal's proof of the Erdős conjecture that the binomial coefficient of 2n choose n is not squarefree for any n greater than 4.
theorem_2: Velammal's digit criterion: if at least two base-P digits of n are at least (P+1)/2, for a prime P, then P^2 divides the binomial coefficient of 2n choose n.
theorem_p24: Velammal's explicit form of Sárközy's theorem: for every n at least 2^8000 the binomial coefficient of 2n choose n is not squarefree.
Velammal, G., Is the binomial coefficient {} squarefree?. Hardy-Ramanujan J. 18 (1995), 23--45. DOI 10.46298/hrj.1995.132. No notice is printed in the scan (its first page, p. 23, carries only the header "Hardy-Ramanujan Journal Vol.18 (1995) 23-45"); the article's page shows only "Hal authorisation v1", a deposit authorization and not a reuse grant (https://hrj.episciences.org/132, read 2026-10-02); the journal's home page offers the collection free of charge and names no license (https://hrj.episciences.org/, read 2026-10-02), and its publishing-policies page states Diamond Open Access under "Creative Commons - Attribution - CC BY 4.0" for published articles without stating that the policy covers the digitized back volumes (https://hrj.episciences.org/page/publishing-policies, read 2026-10-02); the term is unstated.
The paper proves Erdős's conjecture that the central binomial coefficient is not squarefree for any . Sárközy had shown this for all sufficiently large , using Jutila's estimates for sums to estimate ; Velammal instead applies Vaughan's identity and the theory of exponent pairs, which gives better estimates, and computes the constants explicitly. The unnumbered Theorem (p. 24) states that is never squarefree for . Writing with squarefree, the proof bounds below by the sum of over primes with , each of which divides to at least the second power, and shows that sum positive. The range is handled by direct methods: Theorem 2 (p. 43) gives when at least two base- digits of are at least ; the paper's step leaves only , , and a computer check finds a prime meeting the hypothesis of Theorem 2 for each such except , where is recorded directly. A postscript (p. 45) records that J. W. Sander, J. Number Theory 46 (1994), 372--384, points out that G. Velammal, A. Granville and O. Ramaré proved the conjecture independently of each other.
Source: https://hrj.episciences.org/132.
Bears on. #175: the main theorem (abstract, p. 23; proof completed p. 43) is the problem's statement, that is not squarefree for any , proved for every such ; the Theorem (p. 24) proves it for and Theorem 2 (p. 43), with the computation reported after it, is the paper's means for the range .
Results.
- Main theorem (abstract, p. 23; proof completed p. 43): is not squarefree for any .
- Theorem (p. 24): for , is never squarefree.
- Theorem 2 (p. 43): if at least two base- digits of are at least , for a prime , then .
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.