Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation (p. 24). The paper writes with squarefree, for the fractional part, and .
Theorem (p. 24, quoted). "For , is never square free."
The paper prints it as the unnumbered THEOREM; the base- digit criterion on p. 43 is numbered Theorem 2.
Proof pointer
Pp. 24--43. By (1) and (2) on p. 24, the exponent of a prime in is at least 2 when both and are at least . For the second condition holds automatically, so is at least the sum of over primes in with , (4) on p. 25. The paper detects that condition with a smoothed indicator from a lemma of Vinogradov (p. 25), splits the resulting exponential sums over primes with Vaughan's identity into three sums , and bounds them with exponent pairs whose implied constants it computes explicitly (Lemmas 1 and 2): the pair for and the pair , obtained by applying Rule A twice, for and , with and (p. 42). With the Rosser--Schoenfeld bounds for this gives , so , for all (p. 43).
Read depth
Claims checked: the notation and the Theorem were read on the page images of the print, and the outline of the proof was followed. The explicit constants of Lemmas 1 and 2 and the numerical bounds on p. 42 were not rechecked. On p. 42 the print sets "" while computing the bounds whose conclusion on p. 43 is stated for . Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External inputs named by the paper: Vinogradov's lemma on smoothed periodic indicators, Vaughan's identity, the exponent-pair processes of Ivić's The Riemann Zeta-Function (chapter 2), and the Rosser--Schoenfeld bounds for .
Source. G. Velammal, Is the binomial coefficient squarefree?, Hardy-Ramanujan J. 18 (1995), 23--45, DOI 10.46298/hrj.1995.132; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 175: proves the problem's statement for every . The paper extends it to every with Theorem 2 and a computation on p. 43, as the main theorem page records.