Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdos 1967 extremal problems graph theory
conjecture_p56: Erdős's 1967 statement of the conjecture, proved by Hajnal and Szemerédi in 1970, that rm vertices of minimum degree m(r−1) force m vertex-disjoint copies of the complete graph on r vertices, with the cases r = 2 (Dirac) and r = 3 (Corrádi and Hajnal) credited as known; the statement of Problem 914 in Erdős's words.
conjecture_p57: Erdős's 1967 statement of the Bollobás–Erdős conjecture that 1+n(m−1) vertices and 1+n·binom(m,2) edges force two vertices joined by m disjoint paths, with the extremal example printed as K_1 + nK_m and Bollobás's result for m = 4 stated in the line-disjoint form; the statement of Problem 915 in Erdős's words, with the word "disjoint" left unqualified.
question_p57: Erdős's 1967 question whether 2n−2 edges force a cycle together with a vertex off it adjacent to three of its vertices, offered as a strengthening of Dirac's theorem that 2n−2 edges force a subdivision of K_4 when n is at least 4; the statement of Problem 916 in Erdős's words.
P. Erdős, Extremal problems in graph theory, A Seminar on Graph Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1967), pp. 54--59; the Rényi archive's index lists it as item 1967-05 with "MR 36 #6311; Zbl 159,541". The site's reference text for its key Er67b, is "Erdős, Paul, Extremal problems in graph theory. A Seminar on Graph Theory (1967), 54-59. (MR 223263)". The copy's footnote on its first page says "Another article with the same title appeared in Theory of graphs and its applications, edited by M. Fiedler. Prague, 1964, pp. 29--36. All results given without references are unpublished"; that 1964 paper is a different text, filed as erdos_1964_extremal_problems_graph_theory. The Rome 1966 survey filed as erdos_1967_recent_results_extremal_problems_graph_theory is not this paper either: it bears on Problems 713 and 146 and states none of the three questions below.
The copy read for this card is the Rényi archive's copy of item 1967-05: six A4 pages produced with dvips and Ghostscript, a re-typeset copy headed "Received 1964" with an editorial introduction in italics signed "F. H.", paginated 1--6 by the copy itself. By the archive's page range 54--59, printed p. of the volume is copy p. ; the printed volume is not held and the correspondence was not compared with it, so the printed page numbers below rest on that range alone. The copy's text layer is unusable (its glyphs carry no readable character codes), so every statement recorded here was read on the rendered page images (130 dpi). Provenance: retrieved from https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/1967-05.pdf (HTTP 200, one request; the archive's Last-Modified header says 15 April 2007); 138,940 bytes. No notice is printed in the file (the text layer's copyright-sign characters are mis-mapped font glyphs, checked against the page images); the hosting archive's site footer speaks for the site, not the paper (https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/, read 2026-10-02, prints "(C) 2005-2007 All rights reserved. All material on this site is for scientifics purposes only."); the volume has no publisher page, so the publisher's page was not consulted and no Crossref license is recorded; the term is unstated.
Read status: claims checked, and clause by clause on the page images, for the conjecture that a graph with points and minimum degree at least contains , with its attributions for and (copy p. 3 = printed p. 56); for the conjecture that every graph has two points joined by disjoint paths, its extremal example and Bollobás's result (copy pp. 3--4 = printed pp. 56--57); for the question whether every contains a cycle plus a further point adjacent to three of its points, with its relation to Dirac's theorem (copy p. 4 = printed p. 57); for Dirac's theorem as the copy states it, with its hypothesis (copy p. 3); and, read again clause by clause on the page image for the rows on Problems 905 and 80 below, for the sentence on copy p. 3 (printed p. 56) giving a constant for which every has a line in at least triangles, with the two sentences before it on Rademacher's triangles and Erdős's triangles. The rest of the lecture was read once for the Contents below. The paper proves only Pósa's two arguments on disjoint cycles (copy pp. 4--5), which were not checked; every other statement is given without proof, and the footnote says the unreferenced results are unpublished. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Contents
The notation is for an arbitrary graph with points and lines and , for the complete bipartite and -partite graphs.
- Copy pp. 1--2 (printed pp. 54--55): Turán's theorem, and the uniqueness of ; Dirac's result that contains ; properties of (for a subgraph , and the cycle for large); the function with for , for and ; with Reiman's bounds .
- Copy p. 3 (printed p. 56): the report that Brown, Rényi, Sós and Erdős have just shown ; the Kővári--Sós--Turán bound and the question of how many lines force ; Rademacher's triangles in , Erdős's triangles in for (false at by ), the lemma that some constant gives a line in triangles in every (quoted in the row on Problem 905 below), and four-cycles in ; Ore's and Dirac's Hamiltonian theorems and Pósa's generalization; the conjecture on (paged at conjecture_p56); the Erdős--Gallai theorem on independent lines with its extremal graphs and ; Dirac's theorem [4] (see also Erdős and Pósa [9]) that for every contains a subgraph homeomorphic to , called best possible, with the conjecture that for every contains a subgraph homeomorphic to (Dirac's sentence is quoted at question_p57); and the Bollobás--Erdős theorem [1] that every contains a cycle plus a further point adjacent to two of its points, so that two of its points are joined by "three linedisjoint paths", both statements called best possible (the sentence is quoted at conjecture_p57).
- Copy p. 4 (printed p. 57): the conjecture on disjoint paths with the example as printed and Bollobás's theorem (paged at conjecture_p57); the question on (paged at question_p57); the remark that every contains a cycle; the Erdős--Pósa theorem that every contains disjoint cycles if , sharp up to the graph ; and Pósa's argument, given in full, that every contains two disjoint cycles if .
- Copy pp. 4--5 (printed pp. 57--58): the proof of Pósa's theorem that every graph contains two line-disjoint cycles, proved for multigraphs by induction.
- Copy pp. 5--6 (printed pp. 58--59): references [1]--[15]: [1] Bollobás and Erdős, Mat. Lapok 13 (1962) 143--152; [2] Corrádi and Hajnal, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 14 (1963) 423--439; [3] Dirac, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 2 (1952) 69--81; [4] Dirac, Math. Nachr. 22 (1960) 61--85; [5] Dirac, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 14 (1963) 417--422; [6] Erdős, Riveon Lematematika 9 (1955) 13--17; [7] Erdős, Ill. J. Math. 6 (1962) 122--127; [8] Erdős and Gallai, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 10 (1959) 337--356; [9] Erdős and Pósa, Publ. Math. Debrecen 9 (1962) 3--12; [10] Kővári, Sós and Turán, Colloq. Math. 3 (1954) 50--57; [11] Ore, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 55 (1961) 315--322; [12] Reiman, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 9 (1958) 269--279; [13] Turán, Mat. Fiz. Lapok 48 (1941) 436--452; [14] Turán, Colloq. Math. 3 (1954) 19--30; [15] Zarankiewicz, Colloq. Math. 2 (1951) 301.
Compiled scope
All six copy pages were read on the page images; the three consumed statements and Dirac's theorem are at claims-checked depth. The two proofs the paper prints (Pósa's arguments) were not checked, and no other statement carries a proof. The copy's sentence on the case says "four line-disjoint paths", and its sentence "three linedisjoint paths", where the conjecture itself says "disjoint" without qualification; the problem page for Problem 915 records the two readings.
Bears on. #914: the site's key Er67b; copy p. 3 (printed p. 56, page image) states, without naming an author, the conjecture that a graph with points, each of degree at least , contains , and credits the case to Dirac's Hamiltonian theorem [3] and the case to Corrádi and Hajnal [2]; this is the problem's statement in Erdős's words, with the two cases the site names, quoted at conjecture_p56; #915: the site's key Er67b, cited by the site with "p. 4"; copy pp. 3--4 (printed pp. 56--57, page images) state the conjecture that every graph has two points joined by "disjoint" paths, give as the graph showing that the bound would be sharp, and report Bollobás's proof of the case in the form that every has two points joined by four line-disjoint paths, again sharp; this is the problem's statement in Erdős's words, with the extremal example as printed, quoted at conjecture_p57; #916: the site's key Er67b; copy p. 4 (printed p. 57, page image) asks whether every contains a cycle plus a further point adjacent to three of its points, and remarks that an affirmative answer would strengthen Dirac's theorem, since the configuration is a subgraph homeomorphic to in which the three paths at one branch point are single lines; this is the problem's question in Erdős's words, with Dirac's result stated on copy p. 3 for , quoted at question_p57; #905: copy p. 3 (printed p. 56, page image) recalls Rademacher's 1941 theorem (see Erdős [6]) that every contains triangles and Erdős's generalization [7] that for some constant and all every contains triangles, then names one of the lemmas that proof needed: "there exists a constant , such that every graph contains a line belonging to at least triangles", where [7] is Erdős, Ill. J. Math. 6 (1962) 122--127 (copy p. 5); Erdős's 1967 statement of the linear bound on the problem's book with the constant bounded by , which for a graph on vertices is the problem's in the site's normalization (an arithmetic remark made here), eight years before the 1975 statement the problem page quotes; the paper gives no proof and names no coauthor for the bound on ; #80: the same lemma sentence of copy p. 3 (printed p. 56, page image), quoted in the row above and credited to the lemmas of Erdős [7]; Erdős's 1967 statement of the linear book bound one line above the Turán number, the bound for densities above that the problem page records from his 1988 and 1992 papers as "well known" and "easy to see".
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.