Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Sothanaphan 2026 compact poissonbessel proof integer distance free

../

lemma_1_1: For 0 < s < 1 the kernel K_s(t), the sum over k at least 1 of (k + 2 s k^2) e^(-sk) J_0(2 pi k t), is positive definite on the plane as a function of |x|, satisfies |K_s(t)| <= K_s(0) << s^(-2), and equals an absolutely convergent sum over integers m of explicit terms T_m(s,t).

lemma_1_2: There are constants L >= 1 and s_0 > 0 such that, for 0 < s < s_0 and m >= 1, each term T_m(s,t) of the Poisson-Bessel expansion is non-positive once |2 pi t - 2 pi m| >= L s, with explicit negative bounds on each side of 2 pi m, and, after increasing L, T_0(s,t) <= 0 once 2 pi t >= L s.

proposition_1_3: There are constants B, c, s_0 > 0 such that for 0 < s < s_0 the Poisson-Bessel kernel satisfies K_s(t) <= -c (1+t)^(-1/2) whenever the distance from t to the nearest integer is at least B s.

theorem_2_1: The manuscript's main theorem: for R at least 1, a measurable subset of the planar disc of radius R with no two distinct points at a positive integer distance has measure at most a constant times R^(1/2); with Sárközy's construction, M(R) = R^(1/2+o(1)).


Nat Sothanaphan, A compact Poisson–Bessel proof for integer-distance-free planar sets. manuscript (2026).

The manuscript is dated 29 April 2026 and runs to four pages. Sothanaphan records a streamlined version of Chojecki's recent argument on Erdős Problem 953: writing M(R)M(R) for the supremum of the measures of measurable subsets of the disc BR(0)B_R(0) of the plane with no two distinct points at a positive integer distance (p. 1), Theorem 2.1 (p. 4) proves M(R)≪R1/2M(R)\ll R^{1/2} for R≥1R\ge1, which with Sárközy's construction, cited for the lower bound, gives M(R)=R1/2+o(1)M(R)=R^{1/2+o(1)} (pp. 1, 4). The method is a Delsarte-type energy bound with a radial kernel expanded in Bessel functions J0J_0: for 0<s<10<s<1, Lemma 1.1 (p. 2) takes Ks(t)=∑k≥1(k+2sk2)e−skJ0(2πkt)K_s(t)=\sum_{k\ge1}(k+2sk^2)e^{-sk}J_0(2\pi kt), obtained from the Abel-smoothed sum ∑k≥1e−skJ0(2πkt)\sum_{k\ge1}e^{-sk}J_0(2\pi kt), shows that x↦Ks(∣x∣)x\mapsto K_s(|x|) is positive definite on the plane with ∣Ks(t)∣≤Ks(0)≪s−2|K_s(t)|\le K_s(0)\ll s^{-2}, and expands it by Poisson summation into terms Tm(s,t)T_m(s,t) indexed by the integers mm. Lemma 1.2 (p. 2) signs those terms, and Proposition 1.3 (p. 3) gives the key negativity: there are B,c,s0>0B,c,s_0>0 with Ks(t)≤−c(1+t)−1/2K_s(t)\le-c(1+t)^{-1/2} whenever 0<s<s00<s<s_0 and ∥t∥Z≥Bs\|t\|_{\mathbb Z}\ge Bs. The energy inequality then sets an O(m)O(m) near-diagonal contribution, for a compact subset of measure mm, against a negative off-diagonal contribution of size about R−1/2m2R^{-1/2}m^2, forcing m≪R1/2m\ll R^{1/2}. The manuscript states that it was produced with use of GPT-5.5 Thinking.

Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jthm5EkUg5l8nnSCB0Ojk0YJteJP6L9P/view. The copy read for this card is the author's four-page manuscript from that Google Drive share, which prints no notice; the share states no license for the file, and an arXiv author query on 2026-10-02 found no arXiv record for the paper; the term is unstated.

Read status: claims checked for Lemmas 1.1 and 1.2, Proposition 1.3 and Theorem 2.1, read clause by clause on the page images of the manuscript; the proofs were followed at the level recorded on each result page, and Sárközy's construction was not read here. Nothing here is independently reviewed by this corpus; the outside review of the argument is recorded on the problem's claim page.

Bears on. #953: Theorem 2.1 gives M(R)≪R1/2M(R)\ll R^{1/2} for R≥1R\ge1 and, with Sárközy's cited lower bound, the exponent in M(R)=R1/2+o(1)M(R)=R^{1/2+o(1)}; it does not decide whether M(R)M(R) has order exactly R1/2R^{1/2}, which the problem page leaves open. The bound is Chojecki's, recorded at his Theorem 1.1; this manuscript gives a shorter proof of it.

Results. Labels and pages are those of the manuscript named above (pp. 1-4).

  • Lemma 1.1 (p. 2): for 0<s<10<s<1, x↦Ks(∣x∣)x\mapsto K_s(|x|) is positive definite on R2\mathbb R^2, ∣Ks(t)∣≤Ks(0)≪s−2|K_s(t)|\le K_s(0)\ll s^{-2}, and Ks(t)=∑m∈ZTm(s,t)K_s(t)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}T_m(s,t), absolutely convergent, with T−m=TmT_{-m}=T_m given explicitly.
  • Lemma 1.2 (p. 2): there are L≥1L\ge1 and s0>0s_0>0 such that for 0<s<s00<s<s_0, m≥1m\ge1 and ∣2πm−2πt∣≥Ls|2\pi m-2\pi t|\ge Ls, the term Tm(s,t)T_m(s,t) satisfies an explicit negative bound when 2πt<2πm2\pi t<2\pi m and is non-positive when 2πt>2πm2\pi t>2\pi m; after increasing LL, T0(s,t)≤0T_0(s,t)\le0 whenever 2πt≥Ls2\pi t\ge Ls.
  • Proposition 1.3 (p. 3): there are B,c,s0>0B,c,s_0>0 with Ks(t)≤−c(1+t)−1/2K_s(t)\le-c(1+t)^{-1/2} whenever 0<s<s00<s<s_0 and ∥t∥Z≥Bs\|t\|_{\mathbb Z}\ge Bs.
  • Theorem 2.1 (p. 4): M(R)≪R1/2M(R)\ll R^{1/2} for R≥1R\ge1; with Sárközy's construction, M(R)=R1/2+o(1)M(R)=R^{1/2+o(1)}.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.