Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Let be the supremum of the measures of measurable sets in the disc of radius about the origin such that is never a positive integer for distinct , the quantity Problem 953 asks about. Theorem 1.1 of Przemek Chojecki's note A Poisson–Bessel kernel bound for planar sets avoiding integer distances states that for all , and consequently as ; Theorem 1 of the shorter note The order of growth of planar sets avoiding integer distances states the same. The proof reduces the measurable problem to the uniform estimate for and (Theorem 1.2), where counts points in a disc of radius whose pairwise distances stay at least from the integers, and proves that estimate with the positive-definite kernel , whose Poisson expansion has non-positive terms away from -neighborhoods of the integers. The matching lower bound comes from Sárközy's theorem on robust point sets. Both notes read the question as asking for the order of growth of and take as its answer; the problem page's Formulation also asks whether the factor can be removed. The notes are carded at chojecki_2026_poisson_bessel_kernel_bound_planar_sets and chojecki_2026_order_growth_planar_sets_avoiding_integer.
Submission note. Posted to the site's forum by Przemek Chojecki on 27 April 2026:
Let denote the supremum of the measures of measurable sets $A\subset B_R(0)\subset\mathbb R^2$ such that is never a positive integer for distinct . With GPT-5.5 Pro I've got
by using a Poisson-Bessel kernel. Consequently,
Here's the note with a proof.
EDIT: streamlined and cleaned version is here following comments by Vjeko.
Covers. The exponent of growth of : jointly with the lower bound
that the site credits, Sárközy's
theorem as Koizumi and Kovač adapted it on the site's thread, the theorem
settles the exponent in . The claim's value is
answered because the result determines that exponent. Not covered: the
constant-factor question, whether has order exactly , that
is, whether the factor between the two bounds can be removed; the
problem stays open on it.
Claimant. Chojecki posted the bound on the site's discussion thread on 27 April 2026, crediting GPT-5.5 Pro, with the long note; the short note, which Chojecki attributed to GPT-5.5, followed on 28 April 2026. Nat Sothanaphan posted a streamlined write-up of the same argument on 28 April 2026, prepared with GPT-5.5 Thinking (Theorem 2.1 of that write-up is the same bound); it is linked above and carded at sothanaphan_2026_compact_poissonbessel_proof_integer_distance_free.
Depends on. Sárközy's power lower bound, which supplies the lower half of .
Acceptance. Reviewed: on 8 May 2026 Vjekoslav Kovač, who is independent
of the claimant, wrote on the site's thread that the proof Chojecki obtained
is correct and that Sothanaphan's simplification presents it well. Not
refereed. The site's curator has not credited the result: the site labels
the problem OPEN. Allen Hart's Lean development, linked above at a pinned
commit, declares Chojecki's long note its primary informal source and
proves the upper bound alone (erdos953_upper, stated for closed discs);
this corpus has not built or audited it, so formalized is not listed.