Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Hasler 2024 sums distinct powers 3 4

../

lemma_3: Hasler and Melfi's computation that the auxiliary function k of their Definition 1, a minimal average density of a union of intervals built from powers of 3 and 4, has minimum value 1015/1458 on [1,4/3], attained at 1.

proposition_5: Hasler and Melfi's upper bound 1015/1458, about 0.69616, for the lower asymptotic density of the set of sums of distinct powers of 3 and distinct powers of 4.

theorem_4: Hasler and Melfi's lower bound for the counting function of the set of sums of distinct powers of 3 and distinct powers of 4: it is at least a positive constant times x to the power 0.97777, improving Melfi's exponent 0.965.


M. F. Hasler and G. Melfi, On sums of distinct powers of 3 and 4, Combinatorics and Number Theory 13 (2024), no. 2, 141--148; DOI 10.2140/cnt.2024.13.141. Received 21 January 2024, revised 31 May 2024. MSC2020 primary 11A67, secondary 11B37.

The copy read for this card is the publisher's (Mathematical Sciences Publishers) PDF, eleven PDF pages: the journal's article cover page (PDF p. 1), the eight printed pages 141--148 (PDF pp. 2--9; PDF p. nn is printed p. n+139n+139), and the journal's masthead and issue table of contents (PDF pp. 10--11), with a text layer. Provenance: downloaded in the survey of September 2026; the survey record identifies the source by the DOI 10.2140/cnt.2024.13.141 (https://doi.org/10.2140/cnt.2024.13.141), which the first page also prints, and the download URL itself was not recorded; 689,544 bytes. The copy prints "© 2024 MSP (Mathematical Sciences Publishers)." on printed p. 141 and "© 2024 Mathematical Sciences Publishers" on the journal's masthead (PDF p. 10), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for Lemma 3, Theorem 4 and Proposition 5, whose statements were read clause by clause on the printed pages; their proofs were read but not verified; the problem page does not yet consume any statement from this source. Result pages: Lemma 3, Theorem 4, Proposition 5.

Contents

  • Setting (p. 141): Σ(Pow({a1,…,ak}),s)\Sigma(\mathrm{Pow}(\{a_1,\dots,a_k\}),s) is the set of sums of terms aira_i^r over distinct pairs (i,r)(i,r) with r≥sr\ge s, including the empty sum, and P{a1,…,ak}(x)P_{\{a_1,\dots,a_k\}}(x) counts the elements ≤x\le x of the s=0s=0 set. For {3,4}\{3,4\} and s=0s=0 this set is exactly the sumset A+BA+B of the problem, and by Melfi 2001, Proposition 1 (the problem's [Me01]), $P_{{3,4},1}(x)\le P_{{3,4}}(x)\le 4P_{{3,4},1}(x)$, so the s=0s=0 and s=1s=1 versions have positive lower density together. The paper attributes the positive-density question to Burr, Erdős, Graham and Li 1996 ([BEGL96]) and the conjecture of a positive answer to Erdős 1997 ([Er97]), whom its abstract credits with conjecturing in 1996 that the s=1s=1 set has positive asymptotic density; the previous best lower bound was P{3,4}(x)≫x0.965P_{\{3,4\}}(x)\gg x^{0.965} (Melfi 2001).
  • Section 2 (pp. 142--145): the function k(c)k(c) on [1,4/3][1,4/3] (Definition 1, p. 142), the least value of 1x∫0x1Ac\frac1x\int_0^x\mathbb 1_{A_c} over x≤max⁡Acx\le\max A_c for a set AcA_c defined from unions of intervals [α+βc,α+βc+1/2+c/3][\alpha+\beta c,\alpha+\beta c+1/2+c/3] over α∈Σ(1,3,…,39)\alpha\in\Sigma(1,3,\dots,3^9), β∈Σ(1,4,…,47)\beta\in\Sigma(1,4,\dots,4^7) (or 383^8, 464^6 for c≥39/47c\ge3^9/4^7); Lemma 2 (continuity off 39/473^9/4^7 and piecewise form A+BcA+Bc or p+q/cp+q/c); Lemma 3 (p. 145): min⁡k=k(1)=1015/1458≈0.69616\min k=k(1)=1015/1458\approx0.69616, computed from the fact that the only positive integers ≤243\le243 outside Σ(Pow({3,4}),0)\Sigma(\mathrm{Pow}(\{3,4\}),0) are 62,63,143,14462,63,143,144 and the 3636 integers from 207207 to 242242.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 146; proof pp. 146--147): P{3,4}(x)≫x0.97777P_{\{3,4\}}(x)\gg x^{0.97777}. Statement read clause by clause. The proof iterates over two consecutive "cycles" of the merged sequence of powers of 33 and 44, uses k(cn)k(c_n) with cn=4ℓn/3rnc_n=4^{\ell_n}/3^{r_n}, and the uniform distribution of log⁡cn\log c_n in [0,log⁡(4/3)][0,\log(4/3)]; the exponent is 1−(τ/2)(1/log⁡3−1/log⁡4)>0.977771-(\tau/2)(1/\log3-1/\log4)>0.97777 with τ=1log⁡(4/3)∫0log⁡(4/3)(−log⁡k(eu)) du≈0.2353664\tau=\frac{1}{\log(4/3)}\int_0^{\log(4/3)}(-\log k(e^u))\,du\approx0.2353664 computed numerically (code at http://github.com/m-f-h/SumPow34).
  • Proposition 5 (p. 147; proof pp. 147--148): lim inf⁡x→∞P{3,4}(x)/x≤k(1)=1015/1458≈0.69616\liminf_{x\to\infty}P_{\{3,4\}}(x)/x\le k(1)=1015/1458\approx0.69616. Statement read clause by clause.
  • Section 4 (p. 148): the two-cycle iteration is at the limit of present computation, so the method is unlikely to improve the exponent; Open Question 6 asks whether Σ(Pow({a1,…,ak}),1)\Sigma(\mathrm{Pow}(\{a_1,\dots,a_k\}),1) has positive asymptotic density whenever ∑1/log⁡ai>1/log⁡2\sum1/\log a_i>1/\log2 and the aia_i are pairwise coprime, generalizing the Erdős conjecture. The paper notes that, by Melfi 2001, for k>1k>1 the condition ∑1/log⁡ai>1/log⁡2\sum1/\log a_i>1/\log2 is necessary for positive upper asymptotic density of the s=1s=1 set, and that it is not sufficient: Melfi 2001's example {3,9,81}\{3,9,81\} satisfies it and has zero asymptotic density.

Compiled scope

The whole article (printed pp. 141--148) was read on the printed pages. The statements of Theorem 4, Proposition 5 and Lemma 3, with Definition 1 and Lemma 2 on which they rest, were checked clause by clause; the proofs, which rest on computations the paper reports (Table 1, the numerical value of τ\tau), were read but not verified and the computations were not repeated. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #125: the problem's A+BA+B is Σ(Pow({3,4}),0)\Sigma(\mathrm{Pow}(\{3,4\}),0). Theorem 4 is the lower bound P{3,4}(x)≫x0.97777P_{\{3,4\}}(x)\gg x^{0.97777} for its counting function, which the paper states improves Melfi's x0.965x^{0.965} of 2001, and Proposition 5, with the value of Lemma 3, is the upper bound 1015/14581015/1458 for its lower density. Neither bound decides whether the lower density is positive, and the paper does not settle it.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.