Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdos 1990 normal behavior iterates arithmetic functions
conjecture_3: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's conjecture, replacing a claim Erdős retracts, that for almost all n each of the first k ratios of consecutive aliquot iterates is at most s(n)/n plus epsilon.
conjecture_4: Conjectures that the sum-of-proper-divisors image of every set of positive upper density again has positive upper density, equivalently that density-zero sets have density-zero preimages.
statements_p169: Six assertions on the iterates of the sum-of-divisors function, listed by Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro as ones they can neither prove nor disprove; (iii) is Problem 410 and (vi) is Problem 412.
theorem_2_1: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's conditional average order: if the prime-modulus estimate A_ε holds for an acceptable ε(x), the mean of the even-term count F(n) of the totient iteration is α log x with a positive α.
theorem_2_2: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's conditional variance bound for the even-term count F(n) of the totient iteration, giving it normal order α log n, and so the iteration length k(n) too, if B_ε holds.
theorem_4_2: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's unconditional normal order for the ratio of consecutive totient iterates, for k up to a slowly growing power of log log x.
theorem_4_5: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's theorem that for almost all n some totient iterate of n is divisible by every prime up to a fixed power of log n.
theorem_5_1: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's proof of the case k = 1 of their Conjecture 3 on the ratios of consecutive aliquot iterates.
theorem_5_2: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's reduction of their aliquot-ratio conjecture to the density-zero preimage form of their image-density conjecture for s(n) = σ(n) - n.
theorem_5_3: Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro's power-saving bound, uniform in k, for the number of odd integers up to x that are not values of the k-th aliquot iterate.
Paul Erdős, Andrew Granville, Carl Pomerance, and Claudia Spiro, On the Normal Behavior of the Iterates of Some Arithmetic Functions, in Analytic Number Theory: Proceedings of a Conference in Honor of Paul T. Bateman, Progress in Mathematics 85, Birkhäuser (1990), 165--204, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-3464-7_13.
Copy read. The copy read for this card is a 41-page scan with a book/reprint cover on physical p. 1. The article begins on physical p. 2 at printed p. 165 and ends on physical p. 41 at printed p. 204. The scan prints "© Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. Printed in the United States of America" on its 1990 reprint cover, read on the page image because the scan has no text layer, every other right reserved.
The paper studies iterates of Euler's function and of the aliquot function . Its central unconditional result, Theorem 4.2 (physical p. 29/printed p. 192), lets grow slowly with : if tends to as , however slowly, and , then the normal order of for is . The argument bounds the mean of an auxiliary function in Theorem 4.1, using Brun's sieve and the Section 3 estimates for sums of reciprocals of primes. Section 2 conditionally studies the normal and average order of a completely additive function under strong Elliott--Halberstam hypotheses; counts the even terms among and differs from the least with by at most one (p. 166), so under those hypotheses the paper gives the normal order asked for in Problem 408.
Section 5 turns to aliquot sequences. Theorem 5.1 proves the first-iterate case of Conjecture 3, Theorem 5.2 shows that Conjecture 4 implies Conjecture 3, and Theorem 5.3 bounds, uniformly in , the odd integers up to outside the range of by . Conjecture 4, on physical p. 6/printed p. 169, says that a set of positive upper density has an image of positive upper density. On physical p. 37/printed p. 200 the authors invoke its equivalent preimage form: a density-zero set has a density-zero preimage under . That is exactly the assertion of Problem 955.
In the list on physical p. 6/printed p. 169, statement (iii) asserts that for every , the assertion of Problem 410, and statement (vi) that for every some equals some , the assertion of Problem 412. The authors state that they can neither prove nor disprove any of the six listed statements. The retraction of an earlier Erdős claim, Conjecture 3, and Theorem 5.2 concern the aliquot iterates , not .
Source: https://math.dartmouth.edu/~carlp/iterate.pdf.
Results
Pages are cited by the printed page numbers.
- Theorem 2.1 (p. 171; proof pp. 172--175): under hypothesis for an acceptable , the mean of up to is with .
- Theorem 2.2 (p. 171; proof pp. 175--181): under hypothesis , , and so , has normal order .
- Theorem 4.2 (p. 192): the normal order of for , with Theorem 4.1 (pp. 190--192).
- Theorem 4.5 (p. 194): for almost all some is divisible by every prime up to .
- Statements (i)--(vi) (p. 169): six assertions on the iterates that the authors can neither prove nor disprove.
- Conjecture 3 (p. 169): for almost all , for ; it replaces a claim of Erdős's 1976 aliquot paper that this paper retracts.
- Conjecture 4 (p. 169): positive upper density of implies positive upper density of .
- Theorem 5.1 (p. 195; proof pp. 195--199): Conjecture 3 for .
- Theorem 5.2 (p. 199; proof pp. 199--200): Conjecture 4 implies Conjecture 3.
- Theorem 5.3 (p. 200; proof pp. 200--202): odd exceptions up to to the range of , uniformly in and .
Bears on
- #408: Theorem 2.2 gives the least with the normal order under hypothesis , a strong form of the Elliott--Halberstam conjecture that the paper assumes and does not prove; Theorem 2.1 gives its average order under . Neither bears on the problem's third question, on the largest prime factor of at ; the paper's Conjecture 2 (p. 168) concerns that prime factor only as for a fixed exponent , not at .
- #410: statement (iii) of the list on p. 169 is the problem's assertion; the paper neither proves nor disproves it.
- #412: statement (vi) of the same list is the problem's assertion; the paper neither proves nor disproves it.
- #955: the problem's assertion is the preimage form of Conjecture 4, used on p. 200 in the proof of Theorem 5.2, which derives Conjecture 3 from it. The paper states the conjecture and does not prove it.
Living verification. Needs review. The article identity and page map were checked against the scan described above, and each result page linked above was checked clause by clause against the print, at the depth its own Read depth line records. No complete proof is supplied, reconstructed, or independently certified here.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.