Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdos 1960 problems concerning structure random walk paths
equation_2_5: Gives the sharp first-order planar escape tail with a squared-logarithm error term, using the renewal identity and return probabilities.
equation_3_11: Erdős and Taylor's lower and upper bounds, each sharp up to a power of log n, for the probability that planar simple random walk returns to the origin at least k (log n)^2 times in its first n steps, k a constant.
planar_maximum_multiplicity: Proves that planar simple random walk has maximum local time with limit superior at most one over pi times the square of the logarithm.
theorem_1: Erdős and Taylor's limit law for the number R_n of returns to the origin in the first n steps of planar simple random walk: P(R_n < x log n) tends to 1 - exp(-pi x), uniformly for x below (log n)^(3/4).
theorem_10: Erdős and Taylor's almost-sure limits for logarithmically normalized sums of inverse distances of simple random walk in dimensions 1, 2 and at least 3; the planar case is worked out, and the printed one-dimensional display cannot hold with a finite constant.
theorem_11: Erdős and Taylor's strong law for planar simple random walk: the number of lattice points entered exactly once in the first n steps, times (log n)^2/(pi^2 n), tends to 1 almost surely; a remark asserts the same asymptotic for each fixed multiplicity t.
theorem_12: Records the fixed-multiplicity limit in transient dimensions and explains the missing escape-probability factor in the original printed formula.
theorem_13: Proves the logarithmic maximum-local-time law and quantitative late-time control through geometric return tails and independent path pieces.
theorem_7: Erdős and Taylor's series test for planar simple random walk: with f monotone and increasing to infinity, the walk fails infinitely often to return to the origin between times n and n^f(n) with probability 0 or 1, according as the sum of 1/f(2^(2^k)) converges or diverges.
theorem_9: Erdős and Taylor's upper-class result for the rate of escape of simple random walk in dimension d at least 3: for every c < 1, the smallest distance from the origin at times m >= n exceeds c times sqrt((2/d) n log log n) for infinitely many n, almost surely.
P. Erdős and S. J. Taylor, Some problems concerning the structure of random walk paths, Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11 (1960), no. 1–2, 137–162; DOI 10.1007/BF02020631.
Canonical source. The copy read for this card is the 26-page scan in the Rényi Institute's Erdős collection. Printed p. 137 is PDF p. 1. No notice is printed on pp. 137--138 or 161--162; the hosting archive's site footer speaks for the site, not the paper (https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/, read: "(C) 2005-2007 All rights reserved. All material on this site is for scientifics purposes only."); the Crossref record for DOI 10.1007/BF02020631 (read 2026-10-07) names Springer as publisher and lists only its text-and-data-mining terms entry (http://www.springer.com/tdm) and no Creative Commons license, every other right reserved; the publisher's article page (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02020631) could not be read on 2026-10-07, returning a JavaScript client challenge.
Problem connection and complete input proofs
The paper studies symmetric nearest-neighbor simple random walk on the integer lattice. Its planar maximal-local-time upper bound supplies the classical input for Problem 1166, together with the eventual bound on the number of favorite sites from Hao–Li–Okada–Zheng. The latter theorem resolves the planar question in Problem 1165.
Problem 1166 asks how many different sites have ever been favorites by time . It is not the Erdős–Taylor conjecture on how often the most visited single site has been visited. These quantities require different arguments, although the maximal local time helps bound the former.
Three input proofs are fully written here:
- Equation (2.5): the planar no-return probability is . The proof includes the exact return count and last-visit renewal identity.
- Planar maximum multiplicity: almost surely . The proof spells out the return-time bound, union bound and subsequence Borel–Cantelli step behind the unnumbered conclusion on printed p. 162.
- Theorem 13: the transient maximum local time divided by converges to . Its proof includes a quantitative all-future bound, expanding the source's independent-piece argument with the classical heat-kernel estimate as an explicit external input.
None of these proofs requires the later sharp lower bound for planar maximum local time. The introduction of Hao–Li–Okada–Zheng records that later history; the stronger planar equality is not proved in this 1960 source.
Results
All logarithms are natural. The result pages state each result with its printed label and page.
- Section 2, pp. 138--141. Equation (2.5), the planar no-return probability, with a complete proof.
- Section 3, pp. 141--148. Theorem 1 (p. 143): the number of planar returns to the origin by time , divided by , is asymptotically exponential with mean , uniformly for . Equations (3.6) and (3.11) (pp. 142--143): is up to powers of .
- Section 4, pp. 148--153. Theorem 7: the planar walk fails infinitely often to return between and with probability or according as converges or diverges; the page also records the line analogue, Theorem 7A (p. 153).
- Section 5, pp. 153--158. Theorem 9 (p. 154): for and , the future minimum distance exceeds infinitely often, almost surely; the page also records Theorem 8 and Lemmas 1 and 2. Theorem 10 (p. 157): averaged laws for inverse distances; its printed one-dimensional display cannot hold with a finite constant, as that page shows.
- Section 6, pp. 158--162. Theorem 11 (p. 160): the number of planar sites visited exactly once is asymptotic to almost surely; the page also records Lemma 3 (p. 159) and the remark on fixed multiplicities. Theorem 12 (p. 160): the transient fixed-multiplicity law, whose printed constant lacks a factor ; the page records the discrepancy and a counting obstruction to the printed formula, which is not a proof of the corrected law. Theorem 13 (pp. 161--162): for , almost surely. The planar maximum multiplicity bound (p. 162, unnumbered): the paper states almost surely and conjectures that the limit exists and equals ; the page proves the upper half.
Not given pages: Theorems 2, 3 and 4A--4C with their corollaries (pp. 144--148), iterated-logarithm laws for , of which the paper proves Theorems 2, 3 and 4C, states 4A and 4B without proof and says the corollary on p. 147 can be deduced from either; Theorem 5 (p. 149), averaged return laws on the line and in the plane; Theorem 6 (p. 151), return counts along sparse subsequences, stated without proof; and the estimates (2.9)--(2.18) of Section 2. The paper also poses an unsolved problem (p. 153): how fast must grow so that, almost surely, the planar walk enters every lattice point within distance of the origin before time for all but finitely many ; it says that its methods show that is large enough. Problem 1164 asks a related question about the same covering, the order in probability of the radius of the largest origin-centred disc the walk covers by time ; no problem page records the almost-sure question as posed here.
Read status. Proof partially verified: the proofs of (2.5), the planar upper bound and Theorem 13 are written in full on their pages, which the corpus's two problem pages consume. The statements on the other result pages were read clause by clause on the printed pages and their proofs were read for pointers only. The planar lower bound and the strong-law step of Theorem 11 are not reconstructed.
Bears on. #1166: the planar upper bound on maximum local time, resting on (2.5), is one of the two inputs to the recorded deduction that the union of favorite sets by time has size almost surely; that deduction is a pending claim. #1165: Hao, Li, Okada and Zheng, whose Theorem 1.1 answers the problem, take the first estimate of their Lemma 2.1 from (2.5) and attribute the original-walk estimate of their Lemma 2.5 to (3.11). Theorem 13 enters only their Theorem 1.2 on dimension , which the problem page cites as a contrast.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.