Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Erdős and Taylor (1960), printed pp. 138–139, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8), in the canonical PDF.

Statement. Let (Sj)j≥0(S_j)_{j\ge0} be the symmetric nearest-neighbor walk on Z2\mathbb Z^2, starting at zero, with independent increments uniform on (1,0),(−1,0),(0,1),(0,−1)(1,0),(-1,0),(0,1),(0,-1). Put

qn=P(Sj≠0 for 1≤j≤n),q0=1.q_n=\mathbb P(S_j\ne0\text{ for }1\le j\le n),\qquad q_0=1.

Then, as n→∞n\to\infty,

qn=πlog⁡n+O ⁣(1(log⁡n)2).q_n=\frac{\pi}{\log n}+O\!\left(\frac1{(\log n)^2}\right).

All logarithms are natural. The source writes γ2(n)\gamma_2(n) for avoidance through time n−1n-1; thus qn=γ2(n+1)q_n=\gamma_2(n+1). This indexing convention keeps the finite renewal identity below exact, including its final-time endpoint. The one-step shift does not change the stated asymptotic.

Proof. Write uj=P(Sj=0)u_j=\mathbb P(S_j=0). Odd return probabilities vanish. For even times,

u2r=(2rr)216r=1πr+O(r−2)(r≥1),u0=1.u_{2r}=\frac{\binom{2r}{r}^2}{16^r} =\frac1{\pi r}+O(r^{-2})\qquad(r\ge1),\qquad u_0=1.

To see the exact expression, map coordinates (x,y)(x,y) to (x+y,x−y)(x+y,x-y). Each step becomes a uniformly chosen pair in {−1,1}2\{-1,1\}^2, so the two transformed walks are independent symmetric sign walks. Both are at zero after 2r2r steps with the displayed probability. The estimate follows from Stirling's formula. Consequently

A(N):=∑r=0⌊N/2⌋u2r=1πlog⁡N+O(1).A(N):=\sum_{r=0}^{\lfloor N/2\rfloor}u_{2r} =\frac1\pi\log N+O(1).

Partition paths according to their last visit to the origin by time NN. The increments after that visit are independent of the preceding path, giving

1=∑r=0⌊N/2⌋u2rqN−2r.(1)1=\sum_{r=0}^{\lfloor N/2\rfloor}u_{2r}q_{N-2r}. \tag{1}

Since qjq_j decreases in jj, (1) gives qNA(N)≤1q_NA(N)\le1. Inverting the estimate for A(N)A(N) proves

qN≤πlog⁡N+O((log⁡N)−2).(2)q_N\le\frac\pi{\log N}+O((\log N)^{-2}). \tag{2}

For the lower bound, take NN a sufficiently large multiple of four and set

K=N/4,L=⌊N/2−N/log⁡N⌋.K=N/4,\qquad L=\left\lfloor N/2-N/\log N\right\rfloor.

Then 0<K<L<N/20<K<L<N/2. Split (1) at KK and LL, use monotonicity on its first two parts, and use qj≤1q_j\le1 on its last part. This yields

1≤qN/2∑r=0Ku2r+qN−2L∑r=K+1Lu2r+∑r=L+1N/2u2r.(3)1\le q_{N/2}\sum_{r=0}^K u_{2r} +q_{N-2L}\sum_{r=K+1}^L u_{2r} +\sum_{r=L+1}^{N/2}u_{2r}. \tag{3}

The first sum is (log⁡N)/π+O(1)(\log N)/\pi+O(1). The middle sum is O(1)O(1), since KK and LL are both proportional to NN. Also N−2L=2N/log⁡N+O(1)N-2L=2N/\log N+O(1), so (2) gives qN−2L=O(1/log⁡N)q_{N-2L}=O(1/\log N). The last sum has O(N/log⁡N)O(N/\log N) terms, each O(1/N)O(1/N), and hence is O(1/log⁡N)O(1/\log N). Rearranging (3) now gives

qN/2≥1−O(1/log⁡N)(log⁡N)/π+O(1)=πlog⁡N−O((log⁡N)−2).q_{N/2}\ge \frac{1-O(1/\log N)}{(\log N)/\pi+O(1)} =\frac\pi{\log N}-O((\log N)^{-2}).

Changing log⁡N\log N to log⁡(N/2)\log(N/2) alters the main term by O((log⁡N)−2)O((\log N)^{-2}). Thus the desired lower bound holds at every sufficiently large even time. Monotonicity between consecutive even times gives it at odd times as well. Combining it with (2) proves the result. □\square

Depends on. The elementary return count, the last-visit renewal identity, Stirling's formula, and harmonic-sum estimates. All probabilistic deductions used here are included above; no recurrence theorem is needed as an input.

Bears on. #1165: the first estimate of Hao, Li, Okada and Zheng, Lemma 2.1 is this equation, and the corpus records that lemma among the inputs to their Theorem 1.1, which answers the problem. #1166: the equation is the input to the planar maximum local time bound used in the recorded deduction for that problem.