Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Polymath 2012 new proof density halesjewett theorem

../

theorem_1_4: The density Hales-Jewett theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson, which the Polymath paper reproves by elementary means: for every positive integer k and real delta > 0 there is DHJ(k, delta) such that every subset of [k]^n of density at least delta contains a combinatorial line when n >= DHJ(k, delta).

theorem_1_5: The Polymath bounds in the density Hales-Jewett theorem: for three letters one may take DHJ(3, delta) = T(O(1/delta^2)), T the tower function, so a line-free subset of [3]^n has density O(1/sqrt(log* n)); for k >= 4 the bound obtained is broadly comparable to the Ackermann-type function A_k(1/delta).


Polymath, D. H. J., A new proof of the density Hales–Jewett theorem. Ann. Math. (2) 175 (2012), no. 3, 1283-1327, doi:10.4007/annals.2012.175.3.6. The copy read for this card is the arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.3926v2 (16 February 2010), whose labels and pages this card cites. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:0910.3926), every other right reserved.

The paper reproves the density Hales-Jewett theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson (Theorem 1.4, p. 2), for the first time by elementary means: for every positive integer k and real delta > 0 there is DHJ(k, delta) such that any subset of [k]^n of density at least delta contains a combinatorial line once n >= DHJ(k, delta). It is also the first proof to give a quantitative bound; Theorem 1.5 (p. 3) states that DHJ_3(delta) may be taken to be T(O(1/delta^2)), a tower of 2s of height O(1/delta^2), and that for k >= 4 the bound obtained is broadly comparable to the Ackermann-type function A_k(1/delta). Section 9.3 (p. 33) makes the tower height 20000 delta^{-2}. The paper rephrases the three-letter bound as: the largest line-free subset of [3]^n has density O(1/sqrt(log* n)) (p. 3), and records lower bounds from a companion Polymath paper. The argument is an induction on k by density increment, carried out combinatorially rather than ergodically; it passes through the multidimensional theorem (Theorem 1.6, p. 5), which Proposition 1.7 (p. 5) derives from DHJ_k by iterating it with rapidly decreasing densities, and the paper says this iteration causes the Ackermann-type dependence on k. Since density Hales-Jewett implies Szemerédi's theorem, the authors write that "it gives arguably the simplest known proof of Szemerédi's theorem" (abstract, p. 1).

Read status: claims checked for the results linked below, statements read clause by clause on the printed pages of arXiv v2; no proof is checked step by step.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.3926.

Bears on.

  • #171: Theorem 1.4, with k = t and delta = epsilon, is the density Hales-Jewett theorem, which the problem page records as the intended question behind the site's wording; it answers that question yes, by a second proof after Furstenberg and Katznelson's. Theorem 1.5 makes the threshold explicit for t = 3 and gives an Ackermann-type bound for t >= 4.
  • #185: the paper does not discuss collinear points. The problem page records, as the site does, that the question follows from the case k = 3 of the density Hales-Jewett theorem, the three points of a combinatorial line in {0,1,2}^n being collinear; Theorem 1.4 with k = 3 is that case, and the restatement of Theorem 1.5 bounds the density of a line-free subset of [3]^n by O(1/sqrt(log* n)).

Results.

  • Theorem 1.4 (p. 2): Density Hales-Jewett: for every positive integer k and real delta > 0 there is DHJ(k, delta) such that any subset of [k]^n with density at least delta contains a combinatorial line when n >= DHJ(k, delta).
  • Theorem 1.5 (p. 3): One may take DHJ_3(delta) = T(O(1/delta^2)), a tower of 2s of height O(1/delta^2); for k >= 4 the bound is broadly comparable to A_k(1/delta). The page also records the paper's restatement, c_{n,3}/3^n <= O(1/sqrt(log* n)) (p. 3), and the explicit height 20000 delta^{-2} (Section 9.3, p. 33).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above and the arXiv copy it read.