Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Bennett–Bohman: A note on the random greedy independent set algorithm
corollary_2_1: States that for fixed integers k ≥ 3 and d with 2^{d-1} = k - 1 and N prime, with high probability the k-AP-free process on Z_N produces at step i_max a set I with the U^d Gowers norm of ν_I - 1 equal to o(1).
corollary_3_1: States that a k-uniform, strictly k-balanced hypergraph H with v_H vertices, at least three edges and no vertex of degree 1 has Turán number ex(n, H) = Ω(n^{k-(v_H-k)/(e_H-1)} log^{1/(e_H-1)} n).
lemma_5_1: States that for a constant L and a set of L vertices containing no edge of H, the probability that the set lies in the greedy independent set at step j is (j/N)^L(1 + o(1)) for every j up to i_max.
theorem_1_1: States that on an r-uniform, D-regular hypergraph on N vertices with D > N^ε and with small set degrees and small (r-1)-codegrees, the random greedy algorithm produces an independent set of size Ω(N(log N/D)^{1/(r-1)}) with probability 1 - exp(-N^Ω(1)).
theorem_1_2: States that for an s-uniform hypergraph G on the same vertex set whose edges contain no edge of H, at a fixed step i < i_max the number of edges of G inside the greedy independent set is |G|(i/N)^s(1 + o(1)) with high probability, when |G|(i/N)^s tends to infinity and G has small set degrees.
The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1308.3732), every other right reserved.
Patrick Bennett, Tom Bohman, "A note on the random greedy independent set algorithm," arXiv:1308.3732 (2013). The copy read for this card is arXiv:1308.3732v5 (24 September 2024).
Overview
Bennett and Bohman study the random greedy algorithm that repeatedly adds a uniformly chosen eligible vertex to an independent set of a hypergraph, stopping at a maximal independent set (§1). Their main theorem concerns a fixed and an -uniform, -regular hypergraph on vertices with . If the largest degree of an -set satisfies for (equation (1)), and the largest -codegree satisfies , the algorithm produces at least vertices with probability (Theorem 1.1, p. 3, equation (2)). This is a lower bound on the greedy output, with an unspecified constant; the paper does not give a matching general upper bound.
The proof tracks the eligible-vertex count and residual edge degrees against trajectories and (§4). Lemmas 4.1 and 4.3 bound evolving degrees and codegrees; §4.2 obtains dynamic concentration through stopped martingales and variation inequalities (12)–(18). A separate fixed-time result says that an -uniform hypergraph of allowed patterns has with high probability at a fixed step , where is the lower bound (2), provided its edges contain no edge of , its expected count diverges, and for (Theorem 1.2, p. 5; proof in §5). Lemma 5.1 (p. 20) supplies the requisite asymptotic probability for each fixed admissible vertex set. Theorem 1.2 makes no simultaneous claim over all times.
The applications are a -term progression-free process on prime cyclic groups, yielding a progression-free set with a vanishing specified Gowers uniformity norm when (Corollary 2.1, p. 6; Lemma 2.2, p. 7, controls cube degrees), and lower bounds for Turán numbers of strictly -balanced -uniform hypergraphs with at least three edges and no vertex of degree 1 (Corollary 3.1, p. 10; equation (6), p. 9). The discussion that the greedy output might generally have the order of the lower bound is explicitly speculative (p. 4).
Relation to E156
This source bears on Problem 156.
For E156, take the ground set to be and forbid supports of nontrivial equalities . A Sidon set is an independent set in this mixed hypergraph: four distinct terms give 4-vertex forbidden edges, while with distinct gives 3-vertex edges. Running the paper’s greedy rule on this hypergraph would end at a maximal Sidon set (§1). Theorem 1.1 cannot be applied to it as stated, because it requires a uniform, exactly regular hypergraph satisfying its degree and codegree bounds; the interval also introduces boundary-dependent degrees. Keeping only the 4-vertex edges would miss the 3-term obstructions.
Theorem 1.1 could enter an analysis of a suitably verified uniform Sidon-related process, but its direction is opposite to E156’s requested upper bound. At the indicative 4-vertex scale , equation (2) gives a greedy-output lower scale , conditional on all hypotheses; it supplies no maximal Sidon set of size . Theorem 1.2 and Lemma 5.1 could estimate fixed-time counts of admissible configurations during such a process, but they do not bound its stopping time from above or establish maximality at a prescribed size. The paper is relevant as a rigorous framework for random greedy additive constructions, not as a resolution of E156.
Results
Page numbers are those of arXiv:1308.3732v5 (pp. 1–24).
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 3): for fixed and , on an -uniform, -regular hypergraph on vertices with , the degree bounds (1) and , the random greedy independent set has size with probability ; proof in §4 (pp. 10–20).
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 5): at a fixed step , the number of edges of an admissible -uniform hypergraph inside the greedy set is with high probability; proof in §5 (pp. 20–22).
- Lemma 5.1 (p. 20): a fixed set of vertices containing no edge lies in with probability for every .
- Corollary 2.1 (p. 6): for fixed integers and with and prime, the -AP-free process on gives, with high probability, a set with .
- Corollary 3.1 (p. 10): a lower bound on for -uniform, strictly -balanced with and no vertex of degree 1.
Read status. Claims checked for the five results above, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs were read for their structure only.
Bears on
- Problem 156: background only, as explained in the section above. Theorem 1.1 bounds the size of a greedy independent set from below, under hypotheses the Sidon hypergraph on does not meet as stated; Theorem 1.2 and Lemma 5.1 estimate fixed-step counts. None of them gives a maximal Sidon set of size , and the paper does not discuss the problem.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.