Conventions
Families, the subfamily FT of members containing T, intersecting
families, the block family B(ρ,m) and the substitution G[H] are as in the
statement of L214.
The families used below are nonempty, and their uniformities are positive.
For a family F, S denotes a uniformly random member, so that
Pr[T⊆S]=∣FT∣/∣F∣. For a real R>0 the
excess of F at R is
EF(R)=T=∅maxPr[T⊆S]R∣T∣,
the maximum over nonempty subsets T of the ground set; it is positive and
attained. Call F normalized R-spread when
EF(R)≤1, that is, when ∣FT∣≤R−∣T∣∣F∣
for every nonempty T. If F consists of n-sets, taking T to be a
member gives ∣F∣≥Rn. The absolute form used by
Bell–Chueluecha–Warnke and by Rao asks instead ∣FT∣≤Rn−∣T∣.
For an a-uniform family G on V and a real E>0 put
ψG(E)=∅=I⊆VmaxPr[I⊆A]E∣I∣,
where A is a uniformly random member of G. Thus ψG(R)=EG(R), and
ψG is nondecreasing.
Substitution
Lemma 1. Let G be an a-uniform family on V and H a b-uniform
family on U. The map sending A∈G and (Si)i∈A with Si∈H to
⋃i∈A{i}×Si is a bijection onto G[H]. Hence G[H] is
ab-uniform with ∣G[H]∣=∣G∣∣H∣a, and a uniformly random member of G[H]
is obtained from a uniformly random A∈G and independent uniformly random
Si∈H. If G and H are intersecting, so is G[H].
Proof. A member determines A as its projection to V and Si as its fiber
over i∈A, so the map is injective; the other assertions follow, since the
fibers are disjoint b-sets and every A has ∣H∣a preimage tuples. If two
members have root sets A,A′, pick i∈A∩A′; their fibers over i are
members of H and share a point u, so both members contain (i,u). □
For a≥2, iterating gives an ah-uniform family Gh with
∣Gh∣=∣G∣(ah−1)/(a−1), from ∣Gh+1∣=∣G∣∣Gh∣a, and it is
intersecting when G is.
Lemma 2 (exact spread recursion). For G and H as in Lemma 1 and every
R>0,
EG[H](R)=ψG(EH(R)).
Consequently EGh(R)=ψG(h)(R), the h-fold iterate of ψG.
Proof. Let T⊆V×U be nonempty, let I be its projection to
V and, for i∈I, let Ti=∅ be its fiber over i. A member
⋃i∈A{i}×Si contains T exactly when I⊆A and
Ti⊆Si for every i∈I. By the independence in Lemma 1,
Pr[T⊆S]R∣T∣=Pr[I⊆A]i∈I∏(Pr[Ti⊆Si]R∣Ti∣)≤Pr[I⊆A]EH(R)∣I∣≤ψG(EH(R)).
Conversely, choose I attaining the maximum in ψG(EH(R)) and, for each
i∈I, a set Ti attaining EH(R); the set
T=⋃i∈I{i}×Ti gives equality throughout. For the
consequence, EG1(R)=EG(R)=ψG(R) and Gh+1=G[Gh]. □
The block family
Lemma 3. Let ρ≥2 and m≥ρ be integers, B=B(ρ,m),
κ=mρ−ρ and φ=max(1,κ)/(1+κ). Then B is an
intersecting family of (m+1)-sets with ∣B∣=ρm(1+κ), and for every
nonempty set I,
Pr[I⊆A]≤φρ1−∣I∣,
with equality for I={x} when κ≤1 and for I={z} when
κ≥1. Hence ψB(E)≤φE for 0<E≤ρ.
Proof. Call the members {x}∪T of the first kind and the members
{z}∪Yi∪W of the second kind; there are ρm and
mρm−ρ=κρm of them. Each has m+1 points. Two members of the
first kind share x, two of the second kind share z, and {x}∪T meets
{z}∪Yi∪W in the point of T on Yi; so B is intersecting. Let
I be nonempty and contained in some member, since otherwise the probability
is 0, and divide the counts below by ∣B∣=ρm(1+κ).
I lies in a member of the first kind. Then I∖{x} meets each
Yi in at most one point. If x∈I, exactly ρm−∣I∣+1 members
contain I, all of the first kind, and the probability is
ρ1−∣I∣/(1+κ). If x∈/I, then ρm−∣I∣ members of the
first kind contain I; a member of the second kind contains I only if
I⊆Yi for some i, which here forces ∣I∣=1, and then
ρm−ρ of them do. The probability is ρ−∣I∣/(1+κ) when
∣I∣≥2 and (ρ−1+ρ−ρ)/(1+κ)<1/(1+κ) when ∣I∣=1.
I lies only in members of the second kind. Write
I=Iz∪IY∪IW with Iz⊆{z}, IY⊆Yi for a
single i and IW meeting each Yj′ in at most one point. If
IY=∅, the members containing I are those with this i and
W⊇IW, so the probability is ρ−ρ−∣IW∣/(1+κ); as
∣I∣≤1+ρ+∣IW∣, this is at most ρ1−∣I∣/(1+κ). If
IY=∅, any i is allowed and the probability is
κρ−∣IW∣/(1+κ); as ∣IW∣≥∣I∣−1, this is at most
κρ1−∣I∣/(1+κ).
In every case the probability is at most φρ1−∣I∣. The singletons
{x} and {z} have probabilities 1/(1+κ) and κ/(1+κ),
which gives the equality cases. Finally, for 0<E≤ρ,
ψB(E)≤t≥1maxφρ1−tEt=φEt≥1max(ρE)t−1=φE.□
Proof of the first part
Take m=ρρ, so κ=1 and φ=1/2, and let
h=⌈log2ρ⌉. By Lemma 3, ψB(E)≤E/2 for 0<E≤ρ, and
the values stay in that range, so by Lemma 2
EBh(ρ)=ψB(h)(ρ)≤2−hρ≤1.
Thus F=B(ρ,ρρ)h satisfies
∣FT∣≤ρ−∣T∣∣F∣ for every nonempty T, and
∣F∣≥ρn. It is an intersecting family of n-sets with
n=(ρρ+1)h by Lemmas 1 and 3; in particular no two of its members are
disjoint.
The same argument proves the general form: if m≥ρ and
φ(ρ,m)hρ≤1, then B(ρ,m)h is normalized ρ-spread. For
example B(2,2)2, with φ=2/3, is normalized 2-spread.
Random thinning: proof of the second part
Lemma 4. Let n≥2, let F be a normalized ρ-spread
family of n-sets with ∣F∣≤(2ρ)n, and let r be a real
number with 16≤r≤ρ/16 and r≥2ln(4ρ)+2. Then F has
a subfamily F′ with ∣F′∣>rn and
∣FT′∣≤rn−∣T∣ for every nonempty set T.
Proof. Since ∣F∣≥ρn≥16nrn, the number
q=2rn/∣F∣ lies in (0,1). Keep each member of F
independently with probability q, and call the result F′.
The size ∣F′∣ is binomial with mean 2rn, so by the Chernoff bound
Pr[∣F′∣≤rn]≤e−rn/4<1/2.
Fix T with 1≤t=∣T∣≤n−1 and FT=∅. Then
X=∣FT′∣ is binomial with mean μ=q∣FT∣≤2rnρ−t.
Let ℓ=⌊rn−t⌋+1, the least integer exceeding rn−t. By
the union bound over ℓ-subsets of FT,
Pr[X>rn−t]=Pr[X≥ℓ]≤(ℓ∣FT∣)qℓ≤(ℓeμ)ℓ≤(2e(r/ρ)t)ℓ≤(2e⋅16−t)ℓ≤(162e)tℓ,
using ℓ>rn−t in the third step and 2e≤(2e)t in the last. Put
c0=ln(8/e)>1.079, so the bound is e−c0tℓ. Since ℓ≥rn−t
and trn−t≥(t+1)rn−t−1 for r≥2, the product tℓ is at least
(n−1)r. A set T with FT=∅ lies in a member, so at
most ∣F∣2n≤(4ρ)n sets T of these sizes occur. Every other
nonempty T is harmless: ∣FT′∣≤1=r0 when ∣T∣=n, and
FT′=∅ when FT=∅. Hence, using
n−1≥n/2,
Pr[∃T: ∣FT′∣>rn−∣T∣]≤(4ρ)ne−c0(n−1)r≤exp(−n(2c0r−ln(4ρ)))≤e−n<21,
because c0r/2>r/2⋅1.079≥ln(4ρ)+1 when r≥2ln(4ρ)+2. With
positive probability neither bad event occurs. □
Now let r≥16 and ρ=⌈16r⌉, so ρ≥256 and
r≤ρ/16. The function r−2ln(64r+4)−2 is increasing for r≥16 and
positive at r=16, where it equals 16−2ln1028−2>0.12; since
4ρ≤64r+4, this gives r≥2ln(4ρ)+2. The family F of the
first part for this ρ is normalized ρ-spread, and with m=ρρ,
∣F∣=(2ρm)(n−1)/m=2(n−1)/mρn−1≤(2ρ)n. Lemma 4
gives the required F′, which is intersecting as a subfamily of an
intersecting family. □
With ρ=2 the family is B(2,4) itself: 32=25 sets of size 5, every
nonempty T in at most 25−∣T∣ of them. With ρ=3 it is
B(3,27)2, of uniformity 784. In general
log2n=⌈log2ρ⌉log2(ρρ+1)=(1+o(1))ρ(log2ρ)2,
so along these n the spread is ρ=(1+o(1))log2n/(log2log2n)2 in the
normalized form, and r=ρ/16 up to rounding in the absolute form. The
excess halves at each level because both centers x and z lie in exactly half
of the members; the number m=ρρ of blocks is what makes a whole block
Yi, which a member of the second kind must contain, as rare as ρ-spread
requires.