Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Conventions

Families, the subfamily FT\mathcal F_T of members containing TT, intersecting families, the block family B(ρ,m)B(\rho,m) and the substitution G[H]G[H] are as in the statement of L214. The families used below are nonempty, and their uniformities are positive. For a family F\mathcal F, SS denotes a uniformly random member, so that Pr⁡[T⊆S]=∣FT∣/∣F∣\Pr[T\subseteq S]=|\mathcal F_T|/|\mathcal F|. For a real R>0R>0 the excess of F\mathcal F at RR is

EF(R)=max⁡T≠∅Pr⁡[T⊆S] R∣T∣,E_{\mathcal F}(R)=\max_{T\neq\varnothing}\Pr[T\subseteq S]\,R^{|T|},

the maximum over nonempty subsets TT of the ground set; it is positive and attained. Call F\mathcal F normalized RR-spread when EF(R)≤1E_{\mathcal F}(R)\le1, that is, when ∣FT∣≤R−∣T∣∣F∣|\mathcal F_T|\le R^{-|T|}|\mathcal F| for every nonempty TT. If F\mathcal F consists of nn-sets, taking TT to be a member gives ∣F∣≥Rn|\mathcal F|\ge R^n. The absolute form used by Bell–Chueluecha–Warnke and by Rao asks instead ∣FT∣≤Rn−∣T∣|\mathcal F_T|\le R^{n-|T|}.

For an aa-uniform family GG on VV and a real E>0E>0 put

ψG(E)=max⁡∅≠I⊆VPr⁡[I⊆A] E∣I∣,\psi_G(E)=\max_{\varnothing\neq I\subseteq V}\Pr[I\subseteq A]\,E^{|I|},

where AA is a uniformly random member of GG. Thus ψG(R)=EG(R)\psi_G(R)=E_G(R), and ψG\psi_G is nondecreasing.

Substitution

Lemma 1. Let GG be an aa-uniform family on VV and HH a bb-uniform family on UU. The map sending A∈GA\in G and (Si)i∈A(S_i)_{i\in A} with Si∈HS_i\in H to ⋃i∈A{i}×Si\bigcup_{i\in A}\{i\}\times S_i is a bijection onto G[H]G[H]. Hence G[H]G[H] is abab-uniform with ∣G[H]∣=∣G∣ ∣H∣a|G[H]|=|G|\,|H|^a, and a uniformly random member of G[H]G[H] is obtained from a uniformly random A∈GA\in G and independent uniformly random Si∈HS_i\in H. If GG and HH are intersecting, so is G[H]G[H].

Proof. A member determines AA as its projection to VV and SiS_i as its fiber over i∈Ai\in A, so the map is injective; the other assertions follow, since the fibers are disjoint bb-sets and every AA has ∣H∣a|H|^a preimage tuples. If two members have root sets A,A′A,A', pick i∈A∩A′i\in A\cap A'; their fibers over ii are members of HH and share a point uu, so both members contain (i,u)(i,u). □\square

For a≥2a\ge2, iterating gives an aha^h-uniform family GhG^h with ∣Gh∣=∣G∣(ah−1)/(a−1)|G^h|=|G|^{(a^h-1)/(a-1)}, from ∣Gh+1∣=∣G∣ ∣Gh∣a|G^{h+1}|=|G|\,|G^h|^a, and it is intersecting when GG is.

Lemma 2 (exact spread recursion). For GG and HH as in Lemma 1 and every R>0R>0,

EG[H](R)=ψG(EH(R)).E_{G[H]}(R)=\psi_G\bigl(E_H(R)\bigr).

Consequently EGh(R)=ψG(h)(R)E_{G^h}(R)=\psi_G^{(h)}(R), the hh-fold iterate of ψG\psi_G.

Proof. Let T⊆V×UT\subseteq V\times U be nonempty, let II be its projection to VV and, for i∈Ii\in I, let Ti≠∅T_i\ne\varnothing be its fiber over ii. A member ⋃i∈A{i}×Si\bigcup_{i\in A}\{i\}\times S_i contains TT exactly when I⊆AI\subseteq A and Ti⊆SiT_i\subseteq S_i for every i∈Ii\in I. By the independence in Lemma 1,

Pr⁡[T⊆S] R∣T∣=Pr⁡[I⊆A]∏i∈I(Pr⁡[Ti⊆Si] R∣Ti∣)≤Pr⁡[I⊆A] EH(R)∣I∣≤ψG(EH(R)).\Pr[T\subseteq S]\,R^{|T|} =\Pr[I\subseteq A]\prod_{i\in I}\Bigl(\Pr[T_i\subseteq S_i]\,R^{|T_i|}\Bigr) \le\Pr[I\subseteq A]\,E_H(R)^{|I|}\le\psi_G\bigl(E_H(R)\bigr).

Conversely, choose II attaining the maximum in ψG(EH(R))\psi_G(E_H(R)) and, for each i∈Ii\in I, a set TiT_i attaining EH(R)E_H(R); the set T=⋃i∈I{i}×TiT=\bigcup_{i\in I}\{i\}\times T_i gives equality throughout. For the consequence, EG1(R)=EG(R)=ψG(R)E_{G^1}(R)=E_G(R)=\psi_G(R) and Gh+1=G[Gh]G^{h+1}=G[G^h]. □\square

The block family

Lemma 3. Let ρ≥2\rho\ge2 and m≥ρm\ge\rho be integers, B=B(ρ,m)B=B(\rho,m), κ=mρ−ρ\kappa=m\rho^{-\rho} and φ=max⁡(1,κ)/(1+κ)\varphi=\max(1,\kappa)/(1+\kappa). Then BB is an intersecting family of (m+1)(m+1)-sets with ∣B∣=ρm(1+κ)|B|=\rho^m(1+\kappa), and for every nonempty set II,

Pr⁡[I⊆A]≤φ ρ1−∣I∣,\Pr[I\subseteq A]\le\varphi\,\rho^{1-|I|},

with equality for I={x}I=\{x\} when κ≤1\kappa\le1 and for I={z}I=\{z\} when κ≥1\kappa\ge1. Hence ψB(E)≤φE\psi_B(E)\le\varphi E for 0<E≤ρ0<E\le\rho.

Proof. Call the members {x}∪T\{x\}\cup T of the first kind and the members {z}∪Yi∪W\{z\}\cup Y_i\cup W of the second kind; there are ρm\rho^m and mρm−ρ=κρmm\rho^{m-\rho}=\kappa\rho^m of them. Each has m+1m+1 points. Two members of the first kind share xx, two of the second kind share zz, and {x}∪T\{x\}\cup T meets {z}∪Yi∪W\{z\}\cup Y_i\cup W in the point of TT on YiY_i; so BB is intersecting. Let II be nonempty and contained in some member, since otherwise the probability is 00, and divide the counts below by ∣B∣=ρm(1+κ)|B|=\rho^m(1+\kappa).

II lies in a member of the first kind. Then I∖{x}I\setminus\{x\} meets each YiY_i in at most one point. If x∈Ix\in I, exactly ρm−∣I∣+1\rho^{m-|I|+1} members contain II, all of the first kind, and the probability is ρ1−∣I∣/(1+κ)\rho^{1-|I|}/(1+\kappa). If x∉Ix\notin I, then ρm−∣I∣\rho^{m-|I|} members of the first kind contain II; a member of the second kind contains II only if I⊆YiI\subseteq Y_i for some ii, which here forces ∣I∣=1|I|=1, and then ρm−ρ\rho^{m-\rho} of them do. The probability is ρ−∣I∣/(1+κ)\rho^{-|I|}/(1+\kappa) when ∣I∣≥2|I|\ge2 and (ρ−1+ρ−ρ)/(1+κ)<1/(1+κ)(\rho^{-1}+\rho^{-\rho})/(1+\kappa)<1/(1+\kappa) when ∣I∣=1|I|=1.

II lies only in members of the second kind. Write I=Iz∪IY∪IWI=I_z\cup I_Y\cup I_W with Iz⊆{z}I_z\subseteq\{z\}, IY⊆YiI_Y\subseteq Y_i for a single ii and IWI_W meeting each Yj′Y'_j in at most one point. If IY≠∅I_Y\ne\varnothing, the members containing II are those with this ii and W⊇IWW\supseteq I_W, so the probability is ρ−ρ−∣IW∣/(1+κ)\rho^{-\rho-|I_W|}/(1+\kappa); as ∣I∣≤1+ρ+∣IW∣|I|\le1+\rho+|I_W|, this is at most ρ1−∣I∣/(1+κ)\rho^{1-|I|}/(1+\kappa). If IY=∅I_Y=\varnothing, any ii is allowed and the probability is κρ−∣IW∣/(1+κ)\kappa\rho^{-|I_W|}/(1+\kappa); as ∣IW∣≥∣I∣−1|I_W|\ge|I|-1, this is at most κρ1−∣I∣/(1+κ)\kappa\rho^{1-|I|}/(1+\kappa).

In every case the probability is at most φρ1−∣I∣\varphi\rho^{1-|I|}. The singletons {x}\{x\} and {z}\{z\} have probabilities 1/(1+κ)1/(1+\kappa) and κ/(1+κ)\kappa/(1+\kappa), which gives the equality cases. Finally, for 0<E≤ρ0<E\le\rho,

ψB(E)≤max⁡t≥1φρ1−tEt=φEmax⁡t≥1(Eρ)t−1=φE.□\psi_B(E)\le\max_{t\ge1}\varphi\rho^{1-t}E^t =\varphi E\max_{t\ge1}\Bigl(\frac E\rho\Bigr)^{t-1}=\varphi E. \qquad\square

Proof of the first part

Take m=ρρm=\rho^\rho, so κ=1\kappa=1 and φ=1/2\varphi=1/2, and let h=⌈log⁡2ρ⌉h=\lceil\log_2\rho\rceil. By Lemma 3, ψB(E)≤E/2\psi_B(E)\le E/2 for 0<E≤ρ0<E\le\rho, and the values stay in that range, so by Lemma 2

EBh(ρ)=ψB(h)(ρ)≤2−hρ≤1.E_{B^h}(\rho)=\psi_B^{(h)}(\rho)\le2^{-h}\rho\le1 .

Thus F=B(ρ,ρρ)h\mathcal F=B(\rho,\rho^\rho)^h satisfies ∣FT∣≤ρ−∣T∣∣F∣|\mathcal F_T|\le\rho^{-|T|}|\mathcal F| for every nonempty TT, and ∣F∣≥ρn|\mathcal F|\ge\rho^n. It is an intersecting family of nn-sets with n=(ρρ+1)hn=(\rho^\rho+1)^h by Lemmas 1 and 3; in particular no two of its members are disjoint.

The same argument proves the general form: if m≥ρm\ge\rho and φ(ρ,m)hρ≤1\varphi(\rho,m)^h\rho\le1, then B(ρ,m)hB(\rho,m)^h is normalized ρ\rho-spread. For example B(2,2)2B(2,2)^2, with φ=2/3\varphi=2/3, is normalized 22-spread.

Random thinning: proof of the second part

Lemma 4. Let n≥2n\ge2, let F\mathcal F be a normalized ρ\rho-spread family of nn-sets with ∣F∣≤(2ρ)n|\mathcal F|\le(2\rho)^n, and let rr be a real number with 16≤r≤ρ/1616\le r\le\rho/16 and r≥2ln⁡(4ρ)+2r\ge2\ln(4\rho)+2. Then F\mathcal F has a subfamily F′\mathcal F' with ∣F′∣>rn|\mathcal F'|>r^n and ∣FT′∣≤rn−∣T∣|\mathcal F'_T|\le r^{n-|T|} for every nonempty set TT.

Proof. Since ∣F∣≥ρn≥16nrn|\mathcal F|\ge\rho^n\ge16^nr^n, the number q=2rn/∣F∣q=2r^n/|\mathcal F| lies in (0,1)(0,1). Keep each member of F\mathcal F independently with probability qq, and call the result F′\mathcal F'.

The size ∣F′∣|\mathcal F'| is binomial with mean 2rn2r^n, so by the Chernoff bound Pr⁡[∣F′∣≤rn]≤e−rn/4<1/2\Pr[|\mathcal F'|\le r^n]\le e^{-r^n/4}<1/2.

Fix TT with 1≤t=∣T∣≤n−11\le t=|T|\le n-1 and FT≠∅\mathcal F_T\ne\varnothing. Then X=∣FT′∣X=|\mathcal F'_T| is binomial with mean μ=q∣FT∣≤2rnρ−t\mu=q|\mathcal F_T|\le2r^n\rho^{-t}. Let ℓ=⌊rn−t⌋+1\ell=\lfloor r^{n-t}\rfloor+1, the least integer exceeding rn−tr^{n-t}. By the union bound over ℓ\ell-subsets of FT\mathcal F_T,

Pr⁡[X>rn−t]=Pr⁡[X≥ℓ]≤(∣FT∣ℓ)qℓ≤(eμℓ)ℓ≤(2e(r/ρ)t)ℓ≤(2e⋅16−t)ℓ≤(2e16)tℓ,\Pr[X>r^{n-t}]=\Pr[X\ge\ell]\le\binom{|\mathcal F_T|}{\ell}q^\ell \le\Bigl(\frac{e\mu}{\ell}\Bigr)^\ell \le\bigl(2e(r/\rho)^t\bigr)^\ell\le\bigl(2e\cdot16^{-t}\bigr)^\ell \le\Bigl(\frac{2e}{16}\Bigr)^{t\ell},

using ℓ>rn−t\ell>r^{n-t} in the third step and 2e≤(2e)t2e\le(2e)^t in the last. Put c0=ln⁡(8/e)>1.079c_0=\ln(8/e)>1.079, so the bound is e−c0tℓe^{-c_0t\ell}. Since ℓ≥rn−t\ell\ge r^{n-t} and t rn−t≥(t+1) rn−t−1t\,r^{n-t}\ge(t+1)\,r^{n-t-1} for r≥2r\ge2, the product tℓt\ell is at least (n−1)r(n-1)r. A set TT with FT≠∅\mathcal F_T\ne\varnothing lies in a member, so at most ∣F∣ 2n≤(4ρ)n|\mathcal F|\,2^n\le(4\rho)^n sets TT of these sizes occur. Every other nonempty TT is harmless: ∣FT′∣≤1=r0|\mathcal F'_T|\le1=r^0 when ∣T∣=n|T|=n, and FT′=∅\mathcal F'_T=\varnothing when FT=∅\mathcal F_T=\varnothing. Hence, using n−1≥n/2n-1\ge n/2,

Pr⁡[∃T: ∣FT′∣>rn−∣T∣]≤(4ρ)ne−c0(n−1)r≤exp⁡(−n(c0r2−ln⁡(4ρ)))≤e−n<12,\Pr\bigl[\exists T:\ |\mathcal F'_T|>r^{n-|T|}\bigr] \le(4\rho)^n e^{-c_0(n-1)r} \le\exp\Bigl(-n\Bigl(\frac{c_0r}{2}-\ln(4\rho)\Bigr)\Bigr)\le e^{-n}<\frac12,

because c0r/2>r/2⋅1.079≥ln⁡(4ρ)+1c_0r/2>r/2\cdot1.079\ge\ln(4\rho)+1 when r≥2ln⁡(4ρ)+2r\ge2\ln(4\rho)+2. With positive probability neither bad event occurs. □\square

Now let r≥16r\ge16 and ρ=⌈16r⌉\rho=\lceil16r\rceil, so ρ≥256\rho\ge256 and r≤ρ/16r\le\rho/16. The function r−2ln⁡(64r+4)−2r-2\ln(64r+4)-2 is increasing for r≥16r\ge16 and positive at r=16r=16, where it equals 16−2ln⁡1028−2>0.1216-2\ln1028-2>0.12; since 4ρ≤64r+44\rho\le64r+4, this gives r≥2ln⁡(4ρ)+2r\ge2\ln(4\rho)+2. The family F\mathcal F of the first part for this ρ\rho is normalized ρ\rho-spread, and with m=ρρm=\rho^\rho, ∣F∣=(2ρm)(n−1)/m=2(n−1)/mρn−1≤(2ρ)n|\mathcal F|=(2\rho^m)^{(n-1)/m}=2^{(n-1)/m}\rho^{n-1}\le(2\rho)^n. Lemma 4 gives the required F′\mathcal F', which is intersecting as a subfamily of an intersecting family. □\square

Remarks on the parameters

With ρ=2\rho=2 the family is B(2,4)B(2,4) itself: 32=2532=2^5 sets of size 55, every nonempty TT in at most 25−∣T∣2^{5-|T|} of them. With ρ=3\rho=3 it is B(3,27)2B(3,27)^2, of uniformity 784784. In general

log⁡2n=⌈log⁡2ρ⌉log⁡2(ρρ+1)=(1+o(1)) ρ(log⁡2ρ)2,\log_2n=\lceil\log_2\rho\rceil\log_2(\rho^\rho+1)=(1+o(1))\,\rho(\log_2\rho)^2,

so along these nn the spread is ρ=(1+o(1))log⁡2n/(log⁡2log⁡2n)2\rho=(1+o(1))\log_2n/(\log_2\log_2n)^2 in the normalized form, and r=ρ/16r=\rho/16 up to rounding in the absolute form. The excess halves at each level because both centers xx and zz lie in exactly half of the members; the number m=ρρm=\rho^\rho of blocks is what makes a whole block YiY_i, which a member of the second kind must contain, as rare as ρ\rho-spread requires.