Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Use the notation of the claim. The inner product below is linear in its first argument and uses the measure dθ/(2π)d\theta/(2\pi) on the unit circle.

The exterior inverse and its boundary norm

There is a univalent exterior inverse Ψ\Psi, normalized by Ψ(w)=w+O(w−1)\Psi(w)=w+O(w^{-1}), such that

p(Ψ(w))=w4,∣w∣>1.(1)p(\Psi(w))=w^4,\qquad |w|>1. \tag{1}

One can construct it directly by continuing the root asymptotic to ww near infinity. All finite critical values have modulus one, so no roots collide for ∣w∣>1|w|>1. A circuit in the ww-plane winds the target w4w^4 four times around all finite critical values; the root monodromy around them is the four-cycle seen at infinity, so this continuation is single-valued. The four roots are Ψ(w),Ψ(iw),Ψ(−w),Ψ(−iw)\Psi(w),\Psi(iw),\Psi(-w),\Psi(-iw). They are distinct and account for every inverse root. This also proves univalence: two arguments with the same image must differ by a fourth root of unity, and the four listed roots never coincide.

The nonvanishing derivative has winding number zero around infinity. Consequently it has an analytic square root

g(w)=Ψ′(w)=1+∑k≥2gkw−k,∣w∣>1.(2)g(w)=\sqrt{\Psi'(w)}=1+\sum_{k\ge2}g_k w^{-k},\qquad |w|>1. \tag{2}

At a critical point of multiplicity rr in p′p', the derivative of an inverse branch has singular order r/(r+1)≤3/4r/(r+1)\le3/4. Its modulus is integrable. The finitely many such boundary expansions show that gg has square-integrable boundary values and that the radial boundary norms converge. The boundary parameterization by Ψ\Psi counts each regular arc of ∣p∣=1|p|=1 once: w↦w4w\mapsto w^4 runs through the four inverse sheets. Thus Parseval's identity gives

S=ℓ(p)2π=∥g∥2=1+∑k≥2∣gk∣2.(3)S=\frac{\ell(p)}{2\pi}=\|g\|^2=1+\sum_{k\ge2}|g_k|^2. \tag{3}

If S=1S=1, every gkg_k vanishes, so Ψ′=1\Psi'=1 and its normalization gives Ψ(w)=w\Psi(w)=w. Then p=z4p=z^4, whose critical value is zero, contrary to the hypothesis. Hence S>1S>1.

The modes fixed by polynomial division

Solving (1) at infinity and taking the square root gives

g2=a8,g3=b4,g4=3c8−7a2128,g5=−ab32.(4)g_2=\frac a8,\qquad g_3=\frac b4,\qquad g_4=\frac{3c}{8}-\frac{7a^2}{128},\qquad g_5=-\frac{ab}{32}. \tag{4}

For example, the inverse begins Ψ=w−a/(4w)−b/(4w2)+(a2/32−c/4)w−3+0w−4+O(w−5)\Psi=w-a/(4w)-b/(4w^2)+(a^2/32-c/4)w^{-3}+0w^{-4}+O(w^{-5}), which verifies all four coefficients in (4).

Let VV be the polynomial quotient of p2p^2 by p′p', so V′=QV'=Q, and put R=p2−p′VR=p^2-p'V, of degree at most two. Differentiating (1) yields p′(Ψ)Ψ′=4w3p'(\Psi)\Psi'=4w^3, whence

V(Ψ(w))=w5Ψ′(w)4−U(w),U(w)=R(Ψ(w))p′(Ψ(w))=O(w−1).V(\Psi(w))=\frac{w^5\Psi'(w)}4-U(w),\qquad U(w)=\frac{R(\Psi(w))}{p'(\Psi(w))}=O(w^{-1}).

For f(w)=Q(Ψ(w))g(w)f(w)=Q(\Psi(w))g(w), differentiation gives

f(w)=54w4g(w)+12w5g′(w)−U′(w)g(w).(5)f(w)=\frac54w^4g(w)+\frac12w^5g'(w)-\frac{U'(w)}{g(w)}. \tag{5}

The last term starts at w−2w^{-2}. The coefficients of w4,w3,w2,w,1,w−1w^4,w^3,w^2,w,1,w^{-1} in ff are therefore, respectively,

54,0,a32,−b16,A=21a2512−9c32,5ab128.(6)\frac54,\quad0,\quad\frac a{32},\quad-\frac b{16},\quad A=\frac{21a^2}{512}-\frac{9c}{32},\quad\frac{5ab}{128}. \tag{6}

Since QQ stays bounded on the compact lemniscate, ff has square-integrable boundary values as well. With arclength transferred by Ψ\Psi, the moment identities are

⟨f,g⟩=Sm,∥f−mg∥2=SVar⁡μ(Q).(7)\langle f,g\rangle=Sm,\qquad \|f-mg\|^2=S\operatorname{Var}_\mu(Q). \tag{7}

The projection bound

Set h=f−mgh=f-mg. It is orthogonal to gg. Because gg has no positive modes and no w−1w^{-1} mode, (6) fixes the squared norm in the four modes w4,w2,w,w−1w^4,w^2,w,w^{-1} of hh to be

D=2516+∣a∣21024+∣b∣2256+25∣ab∣216384.(8)D=\frac{25}{16}+\frac{|a|^2}{1024}+\frac{|b|^2}{256} +\frac{25|ab|^2}{16384}. \tag{8}

Its constant coefficient is h0=A−mh_0=A-m. Write h−kh_{-k} for its coefficient of w−kw^{-k}. Orthogonality to gg, with g0=1g_0=1 and g1=0g_1=0, says

h0+∑k≥2h−kgk‾=0.h_0+\sum_{k\ge2}h_{-k}\overline{g_k}=0.

By Cauchy--Schwarz and (3),

∑k≥2∣h−k∣2≥∣h0∣2S−1.\sum_{k\ge2}|h_{-k}|^2\ge\frac{|h_0|^2}{S-1}.

Adding these disjoint modes and using (7) gives

SVar⁡μ(Q)≥D+∣A−m∣2+∣A−m∣2S−1=D+S∣A−m∣2S−1,S\operatorname{Var}_\mu(Q) \ge D+|A-m|^2+\frac{|A-m|^2}{S-1} =D+\frac{S|A-m|^2}{S-1},

which is the asserted inequality.

Strict loss at the unicritical limit

For p=z4+cp=z^4+c with ∣c∣=1|c|=1, one has

Ψ(w)=(w4−c)1/4,g(w)=(1−cw−4)−3/8,Q(Ψ(w))=54w4−34c.(9)\Psi(w)=(w^4-c)^{1/4},\quad g(w)=(1-cw^{-4})^{-3/8},\quad Q(\Psi(w))=\frac54w^4-\frac34c. \tag{9}

The pushforward of normalized arclength by pp has density proportional to ∣ζ−c∣−3/4|\zeta-c|^{-3/4} on the unit circle. Writing ζ=ceiθ\zeta=ce^{i\theta}, the beta-integral recurrence gives Esin⁡2(θ/2)=1/5\mathbb E\sin^2(\theta/2)=1/5, hence Eζ=3c/5\mathbb E\zeta=3c/5. It follows that m=0m=0 and Var⁡(Q)=(25/16)(1−9/25)=1\operatorname{Var}(Q)=(25/16)(1-9/25)=1.

The Cauchy--Schwarz step above is strict here. In fact g4j=(3/8)jcj/j!g_{4j}=(3/8)_j c^j/j! and all other nonconstant modes vanish. For j≥1j\ge1, (9) gives

f−4jg4j=c(54j+3/8j+1−34)=c j/2−9/32j+1.(10)\frac{f_{-4j}}{g_{4j}} =c\left(\frac54\frac{j+3/8}{j+1}-\frac34\right) =c\,\frac{j/2-9/32}{j+1}. \tag{10}

These ratios differ already at j=1,2j=1,2, and both corresponding g4jg_{4j} are nonzero. The two tail vectors are not proportional, so equality in Cauchy--Schwarz is impossible. The stated lower bound is therefore strictly less than one at (9). Its exact value there is

2516S0+811024(S0−1),S0=ℓ(z4−1)2π.\frac{25}{16S_0}+\frac{81}{1024(S_0-1)},\qquad S_0=\frac{\ell(z^4-1)}{2\pi}.

This strict loss concerns the finite projection used in the proof, not the unproved variance inequality for regular quartics.