Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Use the constants in the claim. Since all critical points of FF have modulus at most one, their factorization in F′F' gives ∣a∣≤6|a|\le6 and ∣b∣≤4|b|\le4. Every critical value has modulus at most 1111. Since some critical point ww has ∣w∣=1|w|=1, the identity 4w3+2aw+b=04w^3+2aw+b=0 gives 4≤2∣a∣+∣b∣4\le2|a|+|b|. Consequently

λF=max⁡(∣a∣1/2,∣b∣1/3)>1.(1)\lambda_F=\max(|a|^{1/2},|b|^{1/3})>1. \tag{1}

For a line LL through σ0\sigma_0, rotate the target and variable so that its preimage is the zero set of the real part of a centered monic quartic. Its quadratic and linear coefficient moduli are still ∣a∣|a| and ∣b∣|b|; an imaginary constant may be dropped. The inverse-branch integral against ∣σ−σ0∣−3/4|\sigma-\sigma_0|^{-3/4} equals its renormalized length, since the two radial truncations differ by O(r−1)O(r^{-1}) at infinity. Thus L179 and (1) give

I~(F,L)≤−λF/2500≤−d.(2)\widetilde I(F,L)\le-\lambda_F/2500\le-d. \tag{2}

This uses no assumption that the other critical values lie on LL.

A uniform far-field constant

We first prove that whenever ∣a∣≤6|a|\le6, ∣b∣≤4|b|\le4, and ∣σ0∣≤11|\sigma_0|\le11,

∣GF(σ)−∣σ−σ0∣−3/4∣≤K∣σ−σ0∣−7/4if ∣σ−σ0∣≥T0.(3)\left|G_F(\sigma)-|\sigma-\sigma_0|^{-3/4}\right| \le K|\sigma-\sigma_0|^{-7/4} \quad\text{if }|\sigma-\sigma_0|\ge T_0. \tag{3}

Write H=F−σ0=z4+az2+bz+cH=F-\sigma_0=z^4+az^2+bz+c, so ∣c∣≤11|c|\le11, and put ξ=(σ−σ0)−1/4\xi=(\sigma-\sigma_0)^{-1/4}. Its normalized inverse roots solve

w4+aξ2w2+bξ3w+cξ4=1.w^4+a\xi^2w^2+b\xi^3w+c\xi^4=1.

For ∣ξ∣≤1/8|\xi|\le1/8 there is exactly one root wω(ξ)w_\omega(\xi) in each disc ∣w−ω∣<1/4|w-\omega|<1/4, ω4=1\omega^4=1. On its boundary, ∣w4−1∣≥(1/4)(2−1/4)2(7/4)>1/2|w^4-1|\ge(1/4)(\sqrt2-1/4)^2(7/4)>1/2, whereas the perturbation has modulus at most 651/4096<1/5651/4096<1/5. This is Rouché's theorem. At every root the derivative has modulus at least

4(3/4)3−2(6/64)(5/4)−4/512=185/128>1.4(3/4)^3-2(6/64)(5/4)-4/512=185/128>1.

The roots therefore depend holomorphically on ξ\xi in that disc. The holomorphic functions

hω(ξ)=4ω34wω(ξ)3+2aξ2wω(ξ)+bξ3h_\omega(\xi)= \frac{4\omega^3}{4w_\omega(\xi)^3+2a\xi^2w_\omega(\xi)+b\xi^3}

have modulus at most 44 there, and direct expansion gives

hω=1+a4ω2ξ2+b2ω3ξ3+Eω(ξ).h_\omega=1+\frac{a}{4\omega^2}\xi^2 +\frac{b}{2\omega^3}\xi^3+E_\omega(\xi).

Cauchy's coefficient estimate yields ∣Eω(ξ)∣≤32768∣ξ∣4|E_\omega(\xi)|\le32768|\xi|^4 for ∣ξ∣≤1/16|\xi|\le1/16. In particular ∣hω−1∣≤130∣ξ∣2<3/4|h_\omega-1|\le130|\xi|^2<3/4. For ∣u∣≤3/4|u|\le3/4, 0≤∣1+u∣−1−Re⁡u≤2∣u∣20\le|1+u|-1-\operatorname{Re}u\le2|u|^2. The displayed quadratic and cubic terms cancel on summing over ω4=1\omega^4=1, so

∣14∑ω4=1∣hω∣−1∣≤(32768+2⋅1302)∣ξ∣4<K∣ξ∣4.\left|\frac14\sum_{\omega^4=1}|h_\omega|-1\right| \le(32768+2\cdot130^2)|\xi|^4<K|\xi|^4.

Since $G_F(\sigma)=|\sigma-\sigma_0|^{-3/4} \tfrac14\sum|h_\omega|$, this proves (3) for T0=164T_0=16^4.

The circle, its tangent line, and their tails

Choose a unit tangent ee at σ0\sigma_0 and a signed curvature κ\kappa. The circle, with one point omitted, and its tangent line are parametrized by

σκ(x)=σ0+ex1−iκx/2,σL(x)=σ0+ex,x∈R.\sigma_\kappa(x)=\sigma_0+\frac{ex}{1-i\kappa x/2}, \qquad \sigma_L(x)=\sigma_0+ex,\qquad x\in\mathbb R.

Here ∣dσκ/dx∣=(1+κ2x2/4)−1|d\sigma_\kappa/dx|=(1+\kappa^2x^2/4)^{-1} and

∣σκ−σ0∣−3/4∣dσκ/dx∣=∣x∣−3/4(1+κ2x2/4)−5/8.(4)|\sigma_\kappa-\sigma_0|^{-3/4}|d\sigma_\kappa/dx| =|x|^{-3/4}(1+\kappa^2x^2/4)^{-5/8}. \tag{4}

Suppose ∣κ∣≤1/T|\kappa|\le1/T. On ∣x∣≥T|x|\ge T, set u=1/xu=1/x. Then $|\sigma_\kappa-\sigma_0|=(u^2+\kappa^2/4)^{-1/2} \ge2T/\sqrt5\ge T_0$. By (3), the absolute signed tail density in uu is at most K(u2+κ2/4)−1/8≤K∣u∣−1/4K(u^2+\kappa^2/4)^{-1/8}\le K|u|^{-1/4}. Each of the circle and line tails therefore has integral at most 83KT−3/4\tfrac83KT^{-3/4}. Their total possible contribution to the difference is at most

163KT−3/4≤d8.(5)\frac{16}{3}KT^{-3/4}\le\frac d8. \tag{5}

For finite circles all local singularities are integrable. Together with (3), this also establishes the absolute convergence of the signed integrals used here, including the line case.

Singular windows without a separation assumption

Write f1,f2,f3f_1,f_2,f_3 for the critical values of FF, with multiplicity. In [−T,T][-T,T] remove the set

E={x:∣σL(x)−fj∣≤2η for at least one j}.E=\{x:|\sigma_L(x)-f_j|\le2\eta \text{ for at least one }j\}.

If ∣κ∣T2/2≤η|\kappa|T^2/2\le\eta, then ∣σκ(x)−σL(x)∣≤η|\sigma_\kappa(x)-\sigma_L(x)|\le\eta on this whole interval. Thus a removed piece lies within target distance 2η2\eta of some fjf_j on the line and within distance 3η3\eta on the circle.

For a monic quartic, ∣F(z)−fj∣≤r|F(z)-f_j|\le r implies that zz lies within r1/4r^{1/4} of one of the four roots of F−fjF-f_j, counted with multiplicity. This follows immediately by factoring F−fjF-f_j. The preimage of a target line is a real algebraic curve of degree at most four, and that of a circle has degree at most eight. Euclidean Crofton bounds their length inside a disc of radius ss by 4πs4\pi s and 8πs8\pi s, respectively. Covering the three target windows by these twelve root discs gives a bound for the sum of the two removed density integrals:

48π(2η)1/4+96π(3η)1/4<750η1/4=d8.(6)48\pi(2\eta)^{1/4}+96\pi(3\eta)^{1/4} <750\eta^{1/4}=\frac d8. \tag{6}

For the numerical inequality one may use π<4\pi<4, 21/4<6/52^{1/4}<6/5, and 31/4<4/33^{1/4}<4/3. Overlaps of the root discs only increase this upper bound. No critical point or critical value is required to stay separated from another.

The regular part and the reference term

For x∉Ex\notin E the straight segment between σL(x)\sigma_L(x) and σκ(x)\sigma_\kappa(x) stays at least η\eta from every critical value. Every root above this segment has modulus at most B=T+12B=T+12 by the Cauchy root bound, since ∣σ∣≤T+11|\sigma|\le T+11. On that disc, ∣F′∣≤5B3|F'|\le5B^3 and ∣F′′∣≤M=13B2|F''|\le M=13B^2. The resultant identity

∣∏F(z)=σF′(z)∣=256∏j=13∣fj−σ∣\left|\prod_{F(z)=\sigma}F'(z)\right| =256\prod_{j=1}^3|f_j-\sigma|

therefore gives ∣F′(z)∣≥256η3/(125B9)>m|F'(z)|\ge256\eta^3/(125B^9)>m at every root on the segment. Label the four inverse branches along it. Differentiating 1/F′1/F' along a branch bounds its change by M∣σκ−σL∣/m3M|\sigma_\kappa-\sigma_L|/m^3. Hence the density change is at most 4M∣κ∣T2/(2m3)4M|\kappa|T^2/(2m^3), and the additional Jacobian change is bounded using GF(σL)≤4/mG_F(\sigma_L)\le4/m and 1−(1+κ2x2/4)−1≤κ2x2/41-(1+\kappa^2x^2/4)^{-1}\le\kappa^2x^2/4. The absolute difference of the two regular density integrals is at most

4M∣κ∣T3m3+2κ2T3m≤d8+d16.(7)\frac{4M|\kappa|T^3}{m^3}+\frac{2\kappa^2T^3}{m} \le\frac d8+\frac d{16}. \tag{7}

The reference terms can be compared over the entire interval, including EE. From (4) and 1−(1+t)−5/8≤5t/81-(1+t)^{-5/8}\le5t/8,

∫−TT∣x∣−3/4(1−(1+κ2x2/4)−5/8) dx≤536κ2T9/4≤d16.(8)\int_{-T}^T |x|^{-3/4} \left(1-(1+\kappa^2x^2/4)^{-5/8}\right)\,dx \le\frac5{36}\kappa^2T^{9/4}\le\frac d{16}. \tag{8}

All inequalities used in (5)--(8), as well as the required bounds ∣κ∣≤1/T|\kappa|\le1/T and ∣κ∣T2/2≤η|\kappa|T^2/2\le\eta, follow from the stated definition of κ0\kappa_0. Summing them yields

∣I~(F,Γ)−I~(F,L)∣≤d2.|\widetilde I(F,\Gamma)-\widetilde I(F,L)|\le\frac d2.

Equation (2) now gives I~(F,Γ)≤−d/2=−1/5000\widetilde I(F,\Gamma)\le-d/2=-1/5000, as claimed.