Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Use the constants in the
claim.
Since all critical points of F have modulus at most one, their
factorization in F′ gives ∣a∣≤6 and ∣b∣≤4. Every critical
value has modulus at most 11. Since some critical point w has
∣w∣=1, the identity 4w3+2aw+b=0 gives
4≤2∣a∣+∣b∣. Consequently
λF=max(∣a∣1/2,∣b∣1/3)>1.(1)
For a line L through σ0, rotate the target and variable so
that its preimage is the zero set of the real part of a centered monic
quartic. Its quadratic and linear coefficient moduli are still ∣a∣
and ∣b∣; an imaginary constant may be dropped. The inverse-branch
integral against ∣σ−σ0∣−3/4 equals its renormalized
length, since the two radial truncations differ by O(r−1) at
infinity. Thus
L179 and (1)
give
I(F,L)≤−λF/2500≤−d.(2)
This uses no assumption that the other critical values lie on L.
A uniform far-field constant
We first prove that whenever ∣a∣≤6, ∣b∣≤4, and ∣σ0∣≤11,
Write H=F−σ0=z4+az2+bz+c, so ∣c∣≤11, and put
ξ=(σ−σ0)−1/4. Its normalized inverse roots solve
w4+aξ2w2+bξ3w+cξ4=1.
For ∣ξ∣≤1/8 there is exactly one root wω(ξ) in each
disc ∣w−ω∣<1/4, ω4=1. On its boundary,
∣w4−1∣≥(1/4)(2−1/4)2(7/4)>1/2, whereas the perturbation
has modulus at most 651/4096<1/5. This is Rouché's theorem. At every
root the derivative has modulus at least
4(3/4)3−2(6/64)(5/4)−4/512=185/128>1.
The roots therefore depend holomorphically on ξ in that disc.
The holomorphic functions
hω(ξ)=4wω(ξ)3+2aξ2wω(ξ)+bξ34ω3
have modulus at most 4 there, and direct expansion gives
hω=1+4ω2aξ2+2ω3bξ3+Eω(ξ).
Cauchy's coefficient estimate yields
∣Eω(ξ)∣≤32768∣ξ∣4 for ∣ξ∣≤1/16.
In particular ∣hω−1∣≤130∣ξ∣2<3/4.
For ∣u∣≤3/4,
0≤∣1+u∣−1−Reu≤2∣u∣2.
The displayed quadratic and cubic terms cancel on summing over
ω4=1, so
41ω4=1∑∣hω∣−1≤(32768+2⋅1302)∣ξ∣4<K∣ξ∣4.
Since $G_F(\sigma)=|\sigma-\sigma_0|^{-3/4}
\tfrac14\sum|h_\omega|$, this proves (3) for T0=164.
The circle, its tangent line, and their tails
Choose a unit tangent e at σ0 and a signed curvature κ.
The circle, with one point omitted, and its tangent line are parametrized by
σκ(x)=σ0+1−iκx/2ex,σL(x)=σ0+ex,x∈R.
Here ∣dσκ/dx∣=(1+κ2x2/4)−1 and
∣σκ−σ0∣−3/4∣dσκ/dx∣=∣x∣−3/4(1+κ2x2/4)−5/8.(4)
Suppose ∣κ∣≤1/T. On ∣x∣≥T, set u=1/x.
Then $|\sigma_\kappa-\sigma_0|=(u^2+\kappa^2/4)^{-1/2}
\ge2T/\sqrt5\ge T_0$.
By (3), the absolute signed tail density in u is at most
K(u2+κ2/4)−1/8≤K∣u∣−1/4.
Each of the circle and line tails therefore has integral at most
38KT−3/4. Their total possible contribution to the
difference is at most
316KT−3/4≤8d.(5)
For finite circles all local singularities are integrable. Together with
(3), this also establishes the absolute convergence of the signed
integrals used here, including the line case.
Singular windows without a separation assumption
Write f1,f2,f3 for the critical values of F, with multiplicity.
In [−T,T] remove the set
E={x:∣σL(x)−fj∣≤2η for at least one j}.
If ∣κ∣T2/2≤η, then
∣σκ(x)−σL(x)∣≤η on this whole interval.
Thus a removed piece lies within target distance 2η of some
fj on the line and within distance 3η on the circle.
For a monic quartic, ∣F(z)−fj∣≤r implies that z lies within
r1/4 of one of the four roots of F−fj, counted with
multiplicity. This follows immediately by factoring F−fj.
The preimage of a target line is a real algebraic curve of degree at
most four, and that of a circle has degree at most eight. Euclidean
Crofton bounds their length inside a disc of radius s by 4πs
and 8πs, respectively. Covering the three target windows by these
twelve root discs gives a bound for the sum of the two removed density
integrals:
48π(2η)1/4+96π(3η)1/4<750η1/4=8d.(6)
For the numerical inequality one may use
π<4, 21/4<6/5, and 31/4<4/3.
Overlaps of the root discs only increase this upper bound. No critical
point or critical value is required to stay separated from another.
The regular part and the reference term
For x∈/E the straight segment between σL(x) and
σκ(x) stays at least η from every critical value.
Every root above this segment has modulus at most B=T+12 by the
Cauchy root bound, since ∣σ∣≤T+11. On that disc,
∣F′∣≤5B3 and ∣F′′∣≤M=13B2.
The resultant identity
F(z)=σ∏F′(z)=256j=1∏3∣fj−σ∣
therefore gives ∣F′(z)∣≥256η3/(125B9)>m at every root on
the segment. Label the four inverse branches along it. Differentiating
1/F′ along a branch bounds its change by
M∣σκ−σL∣/m3. Hence the density change is at most
4M∣κ∣T2/(2m3), and the additional Jacobian change is bounded
using GF(σL)≤4/m and
1−(1+κ2x2/4)−1≤κ2x2/4.
The absolute difference of the two regular density integrals is at most
m34M∣κ∣T3+m2κ2T3≤8d+16d.(7)
The reference terms can be compared over the entire interval, including
E. From (4) and 1−(1+t)−5/8≤5t/8,