Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


We prove the stated obstruction. All lengths are Euclidean arc lengths; crossing points are counted once, which has no effect on length integrals.

The family and its limiting line

For y>0y>0 put

Fy(z)=z4+(2y2−32)z2−(1+4y2)z.F_y(z)=z^4+(2y^2-\tfrac32)z^2-(1+4y^2)z.

Its derivative is 4(z−1)((z+12)2+y2)4(z-1)((z+\frac12)^2+y^2), so its three simple critical points are 11 and −12±iy-\frac12\pm iy. Their values are

vy=−32−2y2,uy±4iy3,uy=316+52y2−y4.v_y=-\tfrac32-2y^2,\qquad u_y\pm4iy^3,\qquad u_y=\tfrac3{16}+\tfrac52y^2-y^4.

Thus dy=vy−uy=y4−92y2−2716d_y=v_y-u_y=y^4-\frac92y^2-\frac{27}{16}. Its positive zero is Y=94+323Y=\sqrt{\frac94+\frac32\sqrt3}, and dy>0d_y>0 for y>Yy>Y. The circle Γy\Gamma_y through these values has real center and radius

Cy=vy−Ry,Ry=dy2+16y62dy.C_y=v_y-R_y,\qquad R_y=\frac{d_y^2+16y^6}{2d_y}.

Indeed ∣vy−Cy∣=Ry|v_y-C_y|=R_y and (uy−Cy)2+16y6=(Ry−dy)2+16y6=Ry2(u_y-C_y)^2+16y^6=(R_y-d_y)^2+16y^6=R_y^2. Consequently py(z)=Ry−1Fy(Ry1/4z)−Cy/Ryp_y(z)=R_y^{-1}F_y(R_y^{1/4}z)-C_y/R_y is centered and monic and has three distinct critical values on the unit circle. Its critical points are distinct too.

As y↓Yy\downarrow Y, the radius tends to infinity and −Cy/Ry=1−vy/Ry→1-C_y/R_y=1-v_y/R_y\to1. The other two nonleading coefficients tend to zero. Hence py→z4+1p_y\to z^4+1. On every bounded set Γy\Gamma_y converges smoothly to the line

L=−c+iR,c=6+33,L=-c+i\mathbb R,\qquad c=6+3\sqrt3,

and FY(z)=z4+(3+33)z2−(10+63)zF_Y(z)=z^4+(3+3\sqrt3)z^2-(10+6\sqrt3)z has all three critical values on LL.

The limiting integral is positive

For any centered monic quartic FF, set

GF(σ)=∑F(z)=σ1∣F′(z)∣G_F(\sigma)=\sum_{F(z)=\sigma}\frac1{|F'(z)|}

away from its critical values. Write F=FYF=F_Y and define

J=∫−∞∞(GF(−c+iv)−∣v∣−3/4) dv,I=∫−∞∞(GF(−c+iv)−(c2+v2)−3/8) dv.J=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(G_F(-c+iv)-|v|^{-3/4}\right)\,dv, \qquad I=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(G_F(-c+iv)-(c^2+v^2)^{-3/8}\right)\,dv.

Both differences are absolutely integrable. Near a critical value the inverse branches have integrable square-root singularities, since the critical points are simple. At infinity the estimate proved below gives GF(σ)=∣σ∣−3/4+O(∣σ∣−7/4)G_F(\sigma)=|\sigma|^{-3/4}+O(|\sigma|^{-7/4}), and translating the reference by the fixed number cc preserves integrability.

Let H={z:Re⁡F(z)=−c}H=\{z:\operatorname{Re}F(z)=-c\}. Centering and monicity give eight ends of HH, with asymptotic directions

ej=exp⁡(i(π/8+jπ/4)),0≤j<8.e_j=\exp\bigl(i(\pi/8+j\pi/4)\bigr),\qquad 0\le j<8.

For sufficiently large rr each end meets ∣z∣=r|z|=r once, at rej+O(r−1)re_j+O(r^{-1}). This follows by applying the implicit function theorem to Re⁡(r−4(F(reiθ)+c))=0\operatorname{Re}(r^{-4}(F(re^{i\theta})+c))=0 near the eight simple zeros of cos⁡4θ\cos4\theta; differentiating also makes the end radial coordinate eventually monotone. The same expansion shows

J=lim⁡r→∞(∣H∩{∣z∣≤r}∣−8r).(1)J=\lim_{r\to\infty}\bigl(|H\cap\{|z|\le r\}|-8r\bigr). \tag{1}

For completeness, cutting the integral defining JJ at ∣v∣≤r4|v|\le r^4 gives the length of the part of HH with ∣F(z)+c∣≤r4|F(z)+c|\le r^4, minus 8r8r. Along each end its cutting point differs from that on ∣z∣=r|z|=r by O(r−1)O(r^{-1}), because FF has no cubic term. Thus the two length cuts differ by O(r−1)O(r^{-1}).

The only vertices of HH are its three critical points w0=1w_0=1, w+=−12+iYw_+=-\frac12+iY, w−=−12−iYw_-=-\frac12-iY, each of valence four. There is no cycle: a cycle would contain a Jordan curve on which the harmonic function Re⁡F+c\operatorname{Re}F+c vanishes, forcing that function to vanish on the enclosed domain by the maximum principle. Cut the eight ends at a sufficiently large circle and regard the cut points as vertices of valence one. The resulting finite forest has eleven vertices and ten edges, by the degree sum 3⋅4+8=203\cdot4+8=20. It is therefore a tree. In particular it has two finite edges connecting the three critical points. Their total length is at least

294+Y2>5,(2)2\sqrt{\tfrac94+Y^2}>5, \tag{2}

since the two distances from w0w_0 to w±w_\pm are the two shortest pairwise distances and Y>2Y>2.

For a unit vector ee let h(e)=max⁡w∈{w0,w+,w−}Re⁡(weˉ)h(e)=\max_{w\in\{w_0,w_+,w_-\}}\operatorname{Re}(w\bar e). An end beginning at a critical point has length, up to its intersection with ∣z∣=r|z|=r, at least r−h(ej)+o(1)r-h(e_j)+o(1). In the upper half-plane the maximizing point is w0w_0 in direction π/8\pi/8, and w+w_+ in directions 3π/8,5π/8,7π/83\pi/8,5\pi/8,7\pi/8. To check the first two assertions, use Y<9/4<32cot⁡(π/8)Y<9/4<\frac32\cot(\pi/8) and Y>2>32cot⁡(3π/8)Y>2>\frac32\cot(3\pi/8); the last two are immediate. Conjugation handles the lower half-plane. Writing q=cos⁡(π/8)q=\cos(\pi/8) and s=sin⁡(π/8)s=\sin(\pi/8), we obtain

∑j=07h(ej)=3q+2Y(2q+s)<3+92(2+12)=574.(3)\sum_{j=0}^7h(e_j)=3q+2Y(2q+s) <3+\frac92\left(2+\frac12\right)=\frac{57}{4}. \tag{3}

Here 2<Y<9/42<Y<9/4, q<1q<1 and s<1/2s<1/2. The bound on YY follows directly from its displayed square: Y2>4Y^2>4 and Y2<81/16Y^2<81/16. Combining (1)--(3) gives J>−37/4J>-37/4.

The difference between the two reference integrals is exactly

I−J=c1/4K,K=∫−∞∞(∣v∣−3/4−(1+v2)−3/8) dv>6.I-J=c^{1/4}K,\qquad K=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(|v|^{-3/4}-(1+v^2)^{-3/8}\right)\,dv>6.

Indeed the integrand is positive everywhere and its integral on [−1,1][-1,1] is greater than 2∫01(v−3/4−1) dv=62\int_0^1(v^{-3/4}-1)\,dv=6. Also c>11>(9/5)4c>11>(9/5)^4. Therefore

I>−374+545=3120.(4)I> -\frac{37}{4}+\frac{54}{5}=\frac{31}{20}. \tag{4}

Passing to the nearby circles

Inverse-branch integration and the change of scale give exactly

Ry1/4(ℓ(py)−ℓ(z4+py(0)))=∫Γy(GFy(σ)−∣σ∣−3/4)∣dσ∣.(5)R_y^{1/4}\left(\ell(p_y)-\ell(z^4+p_y(0))\right) =\int_{\Gamma_y}\left(G_{F_y}(\sigma)-|\sigma|^{-3/4}\right)|d\sigma|. \tag{5}

The reference is correct because ∣σ∣−3/4|\sigma|^{-3/4} is the inverse-derivative density of z4z^4, and {z:z4∈Γy}\{z:z^4\in\Gamma_y\} has length Ry1/4ℓ(z4−Cy/Ry)R_y^{1/4}\ell(z^4-C_y/R_y).

We justify convergence of the right side of (5) to II, including its singularities and expanding tail. Restrict yy to a small fixed compact interval about YY. Its critical points stay simple and separated and their second derivatives stay bounded away from zero. The local inverse function theorem in a square-root coordinate therefore gives uniform constants A,η0>0A,\eta_0>0 such that, near each critical value fyf_y,

GFy(σ)≤A∣σ−fy∣−1/2+A(0<∣σ−fy∣<η0).G_{F_y}(\sigma)\le A|\sigma-f_y|^{-1/2}+A \quad (0<|\sigma-f_y|<\eta_0).

Since Γy\Gamma_y passes through fyf_y and its radius tends to infinity, integrating this estimate over ∣σ−fy∣<η|\sigma-f_y|<\eta gives O(η1/2)O(\eta^{1/2}), uniformly for y>Yy>Y sufficiently close to YY. One can see this directly from the chord formula ∣σ−fy∣=2Ry∣sin⁡(t/(2Ry))∣|\sigma-f_y|=2R_y|\sin(t/(2R_y))| in arclength tt from fyf_y. The reference has no singularity there: the distance from 00 to Γy\Gamma_y is ∣vy∣→c>0|v_y|\to c>0.

Away from these windows, smooth convergence of the circles and the implicit function theorem for simple roots give convergence on each bounded set. To control infinity uniformly, take ρ4=σ\rho^4=\sigma and ω4=1\omega^4=1. For Fy(z)=z4+ayz2+byzF_y(z)=z^4+a_yz^2+b_yz, its four inverse branches have the uniform expansions

zω=ωρ−ay4ωρ−by4ω2ρ2+O(∣ρ∣−3),dzωdσ=ω4ρ3(1+ay4ω2ρ2+by2ω3ρ3+O(∣ρ∣−4)).z_\omega=\omega\rho-\frac{a_y}{4\omega\rho} -\frac{b_y}{4\omega^2\rho^2}+O(|\rho|^{-3}), \qquad \frac{dz_\omega}{d\sigma} =\frac{\omega}{4\rho^3} \left(1+\frac{a_y}{4\omega^2\rho^2} +\frac{b_y}{2\omega^3\rho^3}+O(|\rho|^{-4})\right).

These are convergent inverse series near infinity with a uniform radius for the bounded coefficient family; differentiation is legitimate there. On summing the moduli, the linear terms of orders ρ−2\rho^{-2} and ρ−3\rho^{-3} cancel because ∑ω4=1ω−2=∑ω4=1ω−3=0\sum_{\omega^4=1}\omega^{-2}=\sum_{\omega^4=1}\omega^{-3}=0. Consequently

∣GFy(σ)−∣σ∣−3/4∣≤B∣σ∣−7/4\left|G_{F_y}(\sigma)-|\sigma|^{-3/4}\right| \le B|\sigma|^{-7/4}

beyond a fixed radius, with BB independent of yy. The length of the part of any circle in a disc of radius rr is at most 2πr2\pi r (and that of a line is at most 2r2r). Summing over the annuli 2jT<∣σ∣≤2j+1T2^jT<|\sigma|\le2^{j+1}T bounds the integral of ∣σ∣−7/4|\sigma|^{-7/4} on the tail by 4πT−3/4∑j≥02−3j/44\pi T^{-3/4}\sum_{j\ge0}2^{-3j/4}, independently of the circle. Thus the tails tend uniformly to zero.

First remove the critical windows and the tail, take y↓Yy\downarrow Y on the remaining compact arcs, and then let the windows shrink and the tail radius increase. This proves convergence in (5) to II. Inequality (4) proves the claimed limit and hence the strict length comparison for all y>Yy>Y sufficiently close to YY.