Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
We prove L64. Fix , write , and set . For each tuple of digits, first record which digits are zero. There are at most choices. The product of the positive digits is less than or equal to , since their bit widths sum to at most . Every prime factor is at most .
For primes , each exponent in a positive digit is at most . There are at most such primes, without using a prime-counting theorem. All their exponents across all slots have at most
possibilities. This overcounts harmlessly, including digits set to zero.
Each prime factor exceeding contributes more than bits. The total number of such factors, with multiplicity and across all slots, is at most
A factor is specified by a prime and its slot, giving at most types. The number of multisets of at most factors is at most . Finally has at most choices. Unique factorization therefore bounds the number of digit tuples, and hence , by
For large , . The elementary estimate gives, uniformly over the allowed data,
This also covers , with the binomial factor equal to one. The harmless rounding of changes only constants.
Any probability measure on at most residues has an atom of mass at least . For each fixed , this exceeds for all sufficiently large , proving the last clause. The argument concerns these separated digits and their total width; it places no such bound on arbitrary sums of factorial divisors.