Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
We prove L63. All constants below may depend on the fixed constants and starting threshold in its hypothesis. Write .
Elementary operations
If divides and divides , then divides , because divides . Also
Indeed, and . We may therefore enlarge each index in the hypothesis from to , retaining its stated order and ensuring .
A multiset of at most divisors of can be replaced by at most distinct divisors of with the same sum. Repeatedly replace two equal terms by . Each replacement reduces the number of terms, so fewer than replacements occur. Every resulting term divides , and that integer divides . Positivity and the sum are preserved.
The factorial radix step has the following exact form. Put , where . If each integer is a sum of at most distinct divisors of , then
Write for . Then . Multiply a representation of by distinct divisors of by , and add the prescribed representation of . The first group's positive terms are at least and the second group's are at most , so the groups are disjoint. Each term divides . Factorials are practical: induct on using this same construction with , , and the one-term representation of , since each such divides . Including the endpoint in the definition of does not change it for , because that endpoint has a one-term representation.
These operations also occur as factorial_binary_reserve,
factorial_multiset_to_distinct and factorial_radix_recurrence in the
held source for part (b).
The arguments above supply the operations used here without a new Lean run.
Lift one integer
For a sufficiently large integer , let and choose
Increase the fixed starting threshold so that is in the hypothesis's range, , and . Since ,
Choose a representative of modulo . The height condition gives . Hence
Apply the same operation to until the integer is below the fixed threshold. That final integer is a single divisor of a fixed factorial. If the successive choices are , then (2) gives . The sum of the enlarged factorial indices is therefore
To justify addition of indices, if the current representative uses divisors of and the recursive representation uses divisors of , each recursive term multiplied by divides , since . Both groups thus lie in . Repetitions are allowed at this stage.
While the current logarithm lies in , each step decreases it by at least for a fixed . There are such steps. Summing over the dyadic intervals down to the fixed threshold gives steps. Each uses at most terms, so their total is
Remove repetitions using the elementary operation above. The final index is : for fixed exponents, . Equivalently, given a bit bound , every integer has an exact representation by distinct divisors of a factorial with index . The bounded integers and are absorbed by a fixed index and the empty sum. The constants can be chosen uniformly for all .
Chain the factorial radix steps
Choose a sufficiently large constant and, for large , set
Then , and (3), including the distinctness cost, puts every residue in a factorial of index at most when is large enough. Equation (4) bounds its length by . Equation (1) applies.
On a dyadic interval of indices , the decrease is at least for all sufficiently large . Thus halving the index costs radix steps. Down to a fixed index there are steps in total. Charging each its uniform cost gives
as required. The representatives required by the hypothesis have not been constructed by this argument.
A sufficient exponential-sum input
Here is one precise way to supply the local representatives, without separated digits. Let be a nonempty set of odd divisors of , and let be its uniform law modulo . Suppose, for some and integer , that
Choose an integer with and , and convolve copies of with the uniform law on . The last factor kills the character of order two exactly. There are characters of exact order . The sum of the absolute values of all remaining nontrivial Fourier coefficients is at most
Fourier inversion makes the convolution positive at every residue. Each residue thus has a nonnegative representative that is a sum of at most divisors of , with repetition allowed, and is at most . If , and are bounded by fixed powers of , then can be chosen polylogarithmic in , and . These are precisely allowed count and height bounds in L63.
No estimate (5) with these parameters is proved here. The calculation is a sufficient input specification; it does not identify additive cancellation with a multiplicative-character generation condition.