Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

An exact thirteen-point fractional covering obstruction


The following argument and finite computation are author-recorded by Plasma AI. Indices in this proof start at zero. Take the thirteen rows

ivi,0vi,1vi,2vi,3vi,4ai010011696331111016580921010025731110027340011169888511001655536001104352710110435380001169632900100256100101169648110110165808121101169649\begin{array}{c|ccccc|r} i&v_{i,0}&v_{i,1}&v_{i,2}&v_{i,3}&v_{i,4}&a_i\\\hline 0&1&0&0&1&1&69633\\ 1&1&1&1&0&1&65809\\ 2&1&0&1&0&0&257\\ 3&1&1&1&0&0&273\\ 4&0&0&1&1&1&69888\\ 5&1&1&0&0&1&65553\\ 6&0&0&1&1&0&4352\\ 7&1&0&1&1&0&4353\\ 8&0&0&0&1&1&69632\\ 9&0&0&1&0&0&256\\ 10&0&1&0&1&1&69648\\ 11&0&1&1&0&1&65808\\ 12&1&1&0&1&1&69649 \end{array}

Here ai=∑j=0416jvi,ja_i=\sum_{j=0}^4 16^jv_{i,j}. A signed sum of the vectors has integer coordinates of absolute value at most thirteen. If its highest nonzero coordinate is ss, its contribution to the scalar encoding has absolute value at least 16s16^s, whereas all smaller coordinates contribute at most 13(16s−1)/15<16s13(16^s-1)/15<16^s. Thus a scalar signed sum vanishes exactly when the vector signed sum vanishes. All thirteen scalars are distinct and positive.

Exhaustive dissociation and extraction

The checker generates every subset sum of the vectors. Two equal subset sums give a ternary relation supported on their symmetric difference. Conversely every nonzero ternary relation arises from two disjoint subsets with equal sums. A subset is therefore dissociated exactly when it contains none of these collision supports. The checker also obtains the supports by a separate split enumeration of all 3133^{13} ternary coefficient vectors and compares the resulting families.

The numbers of dissociated subsets of sizes zero through thirteen are

(1,13,78,284,673,982,652,16,0,0,0,0,0,0).(1,13,78,284,673,982,652,16,0,0,0,0,0,0).

For every one of the 81918191 nonempty subsets FF, dynamic programming over its submasks computes r(F)r(F). The exact integer inequalities 13r(F)≥7∣F∣13r(F)\ge7|F| hold throughout. The full set has r(A)=7r(A)=7 and thirteen elements, so the hereditary ratio is exactly 7/137/13.

For every subset D⊆AD\subseteq A, at least one of DD and A∖DA\setminus D is dependent. This exhausts all two-color partitions; allowing overlapping covers does not help, since assigning each element to one covering class gives a partition into subsets of the same dissociated classes. A three-color partition, specified by the indices above, is

{0},{6,8,9,10,11,12},{1,2,3,4,5,7}.\{0\},\qquad \{6,8,9,10,11,12\},\qquad \{1,2,3,4,5,7\}.

Each class passes the same exact independence check. Hence χ1(A)=3\chi_1(A)=3.

Matching fractional certificates

Give the thirteen elements dual weights with numerator vector

(2,4,2,3,3,4,2,2,4,4,2,2,3)(2,4,2,3,3,4,2,2,4,4,2,2,3)

and common denominator nineteen. The numerators sum to 37, and every dissociated subset has numerator sum at most nineteen. Thus any fractional cover has total weight at least 37/1937/19, by summing its covering inequalities against these dual weights.

For the reverse inequality, encode a subset DD by the integer bit mask ∑i∈D2i\sum_{i\in D}2^i. The following dissociated subsets, with their weight numerators over nineteen, form a fractional cover:

\begin{array}{r|r@{\qquad}r|r@{\qquad}r|r} 1207&6&1431&1&1687&2\\ 1960&1&3659&4&3689&4\\ 4454&2&4578&1&4792&2\\ 4995&2&6018&1&6492&8\\ 7072&3&&&& \end{array}

The numerators total 37, and each point is covered with numerator exactly nineteen. The checker verifies dissociation and all thirteen coverage equalities. Hence χf(A)=37/19\chi_f(A)=37/19.

For any nonnegative element weights ww, these same sets DjD_j and cover weights λj\lambda_j satisfy ∑jλjw(Dj)=w(A)\sum_j\lambda_jw(D_j)=w(A). Since ∑jλj=37/19\sum_j\lambda_j=37/19, one set has w(Dj)≥(19/37)w(A)w(D_j)\ge(19/37)w(A). This proves the stated weighted extraction consequence without any external duality theorem.

The claim is finite: no extrapolation from these checks to a growing family is part of the argument.