Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


We prove L28. A dissection means a finite union of closed cubes with pairwise disjoint interiors and positive side lengths. All cubes in the construction are translates of positive scalar multiples of the unit cube.

Replacing any one tile by a jj by ⋯\cdots by jj grid increases the tile count by jd−1j^d-1. Repeated replacements realize 1+t1+t for every tt in the additive semigroup generated by these increments.

Put a=2d−1a=2^d-1 and B=Md−1B=M^d-1. On Z/aZ\mathbb Z/a\mathbb Z, draw directed edges adding each allowed increment. The residues reachable from zero form a submonoid of a finite group, hence a subgroup: the inverse of a reachable element is a nonnegative multiple of that element. The gcd hypothesis makes this subgroup the whole group. A shortest path to any residue has at most a−1a-1 edges, since a repeated vertex could be removed. Its sum wrw_r of integer increments therefore satisfies

0≤wr≤(a−1)B,wr≡r(moda).0\le w_r\le(a-1)B,\qquad w_r\equiv r\pmod a.

For every integer t≥(a−1)Bt\ge(a-1)B, take r=t mod ar=t\bmod a. Then t=wr+qat=w_r+qa with an integer q≥0q\ge0. The additional aa increments are also allowed, proving the asserted all-count threshold.

Now suppose d≥3d\ge3 is odd and put M=⌊3d⌋+1M=\lfloor\sqrt{3d}\rfloor+1. If a prime pp divides every increment, then p>Mp>M: otherwise the increment with j=pj=p is −1-1 modulo pp. The subgroup

H={x∈Fp∗:xd=1}H=\{x\in\mathbb F_p^*:x^d=1\}

contains 1,…,M1,\ldots,M and has at most dd elements, by the root bound for a nonzero polynomial over a field. Every element of HH is a square, because x=(x(d+1)/2)2x=(x^{(d+1)/2})^2. In particular pp is odd.

If p≤M2p\le M^2, let rr be the least positive quadratic nonresidue. It exists since the nonzero squares are exactly half the nonzero field elements. Thus 2≤r<p2\le r<p. Put m=⌈p/r⌉m=\lceil p/r\rceil and u=mr−pu=mr-p. Primality gives 1≤u<r1\le u<r, so uu is a square. The congruence mr=umr=u then makes mm a nonresidue, and hence m≥rm\ge r. Since p>r(m−1)p>r(m-1), we obtain p>r(r−1)p>r(r-1) and therefore r<p+1≤M+1r<\sqrt p+1\le M+1. The integer rr is at most MM, contradicting 1,…,M⊂H1,\ldots,M\subset H.

If p>M2p>M^2, the reduced fractions b/cb/c with 1≤b,c≤M1\le b,c\le M inject into HH modulo pp. Indeed, equality of two residues makes bc′−b′cbc'-b'c a multiple of pp of absolute value less than M2M^2, so the fractions agree as rational numbers. Their number C(M)C(M) exceeds M2/3M^2/3: by the union bound, the number of noncoprime ordered pairs is at most

∑j=2M⌊M/j⌋2≤M2∑j=2∞j−2<23M2.\sum_{j=2}^M\lfloor M/j\rfloor^2 \le M^2\sum_{j=2}^{\infty}j^{-2} <\frac23 M^2.

For the last strict inequality, the tail from j=6j=6 is less than ∫5∞x−2 dx\int_5^\infty x^{-2}\,dx, and

14+19+116+125+15=23893600<23.\frac14+\frac19+\frac1{16}+\frac1{25}+\frac15 =\frac{2389}{3600}<\frac23.

Thus ∣H∣≥C(M)>M2/3>d|H|\ge C(M)>M^2/3>d, again a contradiction. The gcd is one.

Finally M=3d+O(1)M=\sqrt{3d}+O(1), so the threshold gives

log⁡c(d)≤12dlog⁡d+dlog⁡(23)+O(d)\log c(d)\le\tfrac12 d\log d+d\log(2\sqrt3)+O(\sqrt d)

through odd dd. Subtracting dlog⁡dd\log d tends to minus infinity. This proves the claimed ratio limit only along those dimensions.