Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
We prove L28. A dissection means a finite union of closed cubes with pairwise disjoint interiors and positive side lengths. All cubes in the construction are translates of positive scalar multiples of the unit cube.
Replacing any one tile by a by by grid increases the tile count by . Repeated replacements realize for every in the additive semigroup generated by these increments.
Put and . On , draw directed edges adding each allowed increment. The residues reachable from zero form a submonoid of a finite group, hence a subgroup: the inverse of a reachable element is a nonnegative multiple of that element. The gcd hypothesis makes this subgroup the whole group. A shortest path to any residue has at most edges, since a repeated vertex could be removed. Its sum of integer increments therefore satisfies
For every integer , take . Then with an integer . The additional increments are also allowed, proving the asserted all-count threshold.
Now suppose is odd and put . If a prime divides every increment, then : otherwise the increment with is modulo . The subgroup
contains and has at most elements, by the root bound for a nonzero polynomial over a field. Every element of is a square, because . In particular is odd.
If , let be the least positive quadratic nonresidue. It exists since the nonzero squares are exactly half the nonzero field elements. Thus . Put and . Primality gives , so is a square. The congruence then makes a nonresidue, and hence . Since , we obtain and therefore . The integer is at most , contradicting .
If , the reduced fractions with inject into modulo . Indeed, equality of two residues makes a multiple of of absolute value less than , so the fractions agree as rational numbers. Their number exceeds : by the union bound, the number of noncoprime ordered pairs is at most
For the last strict inequality, the tail from is less than , and
Thus , again a contradiction. The gcd is one.
Finally , so the threshold gives
through odd . Subtracting tends to minus infinity. This proves the claimed ratio limit only along those dimensions.