Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Use and the full profile from L13, with . Each nonunit divisor of has a unique form , where , , and . The cylinders are
They partition into sets of points. All masses below count class incidences, with overlaps counted repeatedly.
The exact contribution of one class
Since for every , prescribed residues modulo and select exactly one class modulo . To see this, write : multiplication by is invertible modulo , so the congruence modulo chooses exactly one residue of modulo . There are such points modulo . This includes , when the congruence modulo imposes no restriction.
For a class with modulus coprime to , the count is in every cylinder. The sum of these contributions is
Here permutes the divisors of , and the omitted modulus accounts for the subtracted term .
Next take a class with and . It meets precisely when
There are exactly such residues modulo . On each of these cylinders the congruence modulo is automatic, and the remaining condition modulo selects exactly points by the coprime count. Thus the contribution has weight on exactly cylinders, including just one cylinder when .
Necessary loads and total supply
For each , let be the total contribution in from the classes whose moduli are divisible by . The full profile's incidence mass there is
Consequently, even the necessary cylinder mass inequalities for a cover require
Summing the exact class-support counts gives a total independent of all residue choices:
Subtracting forced excess
Call a contribution heavy if its weight exceeds . Define threshold waste and useful supply by
These are quantities for the cylinder lower-bound constraints. They do not count distinct covered points or identify the actual holes left by the classes coprime to .
At a fixed cylinder, suppose there are heavy contributions of weights . All other contributions are nonnegative. At least one heavy contribution is present, each exceeds , and all weights are positive. Thus , and hence
The last inequality uses , since .
If , the last sum is empty and equals zero, and gives the same lower bound. Thus any overlap between heavy contributions preserves the bound. Contributions of weight at most cannot decrease .
Each heavy class of modulus contributes its forced excess on exactly cylinders. Summing the last inequality over all cylinders yields
Combining this with the total supply gives . The equivalent formula for in the statement follows by applying separately to every weight in the finite sum.
If every cylinder meets its necessary load , then in all cylinders, so
This contradicts . Therefore that strict inequality rules out every full-profile placement satisfying even the cylinder mass constraints, and in particular rules out every full-profile cover.
Distinct subprofiles and the guards
Suppose a family with pairwise distinct nonunit moduli dividing were a cover. Add one arbitrarily placed residue class for each unused nonunit divisor of . The resulting full profile still covers, and no cylinder incidence mass has decreased. This contradicts the full-profile exclusion. The same argument shows directly that feasibility of the cylinder lower bounds is upward closed under adding missing classes. A cover of higher multiplicity is also a one-cover and is excluded in this domain. Repeated moduli are not subprofiles of the full inventory, so the argument makes no assertion about them.
If , the constant contribution is already at least , and these full-profile cylinder lower bounds supply no obstruction. For , the proof only gives as a necessary condition. Equality or the reverse strict inequality therefore does not decide feasibility or coverage.
For the boundary , the divisor sum is and . There are no nonunit moduli coprime to , and every class of modulus has weight one. There are no heavy terms. Thus
because . The strict criterion applies at every depth , including , and excludes distinct nonunit-divisor covers of a pure prime-power frame. No finite enumeration is used.