Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Use N,p,a,M,S,DN,p,a,M,S,D and the full profile from L13, with D>0D>0. Each nonunit divisor of NN has a unique form pjmp^jm, where 0≤j≤a0\le j\le a, m∣Mm\mid M, and (j,m)≠(0,1)(j,m)\ne(0,1). The cylinders are

Yt={x∈Z/NZ:x≡t(modpa)},t∈Z/paZ.Y_t=\{x\in\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z:x\equiv t\pmod{p^a}\}, \qquad t\in\mathbb Z/p^a\mathbb Z.

They partition Z/NZ\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z into pap^a sets of MM points. All masses below count class incidences, with overlaps counted repeatedly.

The exact contribution of one class

Since gcd⁡(pa,m)=1\gcd(p^a,m)=1 for every m∣Mm\mid M, prescribed residues modulo pap^a and mm select exactly one class modulo pamp^am. To see this, write x=t+pazx=t+p^az: multiplication by pap^a is invertible modulo mm, so the congruence modulo mm chooses exactly one residue of zz modulo mm. There are N/(pam)=M/mN/(p^am)=M/m such points modulo NN. This includes m=1m=1, when the congruence modulo mm imposes no restriction.

For a class with modulus m>1m>1 coprime to pp, the count is M/mM/m in every cylinder. The sum of these contributions is

∑m∣Mm>1Mm=∑d∣Md−M=S−M.\sum_{\substack{m\mid M\\m>1}}\frac{M}{m} =\sum_{d\mid M}d-M=S-M.

Here m↦M/mm\mapsto M/m permutes the divisors of MM, and the omitted modulus m=1m=1 accounts for the subtracted term MM.

Next take a class bpjm(pjm)b_{p^jm}(p^jm) with 1≤j≤a1\le j\le a and m∣Mm\mid M. It meets YtY_t precisely when

t≡bpjm(modpj).t\equiv b_{p^jm}\pmod{p^j}.

There are exactly pa−jp^{a-j} such residues tt modulo pap^a. On each of these cylinders the congruence modulo pjp^j is automatic, and the remaining condition modulo mm selects exactly M/mM/m points by the coprime count. Thus the contribution has weight M/mM/m on exactly pa−jp^{a-j} cylinders, including just one cylinder when j=aj=a.

Necessary loads and total supply

For each tt, let TtT_t be the total contribution in YtY_t from the classes whose moduli are divisible by pp. The full profile's incidence mass there is

(S−M)+Tt.(S-M)+T_t.

Consequently, even the necessary cylinder mass inequalities for a cover require

(S−M)+Tt≥M,that is,Tt≥Dfor every t.(S-M)+T_t\ge M,\qquad\hbox{that is,}\qquad T_t\ge D \quad\hbox{for every }t.

Summing the exact class-support counts gives a total independent of all residue choices:

∑tTt=∑j=1a∑m∣MMmpa−j=S∑j=1apa−j=Spa−1p−1.\sum_t T_t =\sum_{j=1}^a\sum_{m\mid M}\frac{M}{m}p^{a-j} =S\sum_{j=1}^a p^{a-j} =S\frac{p^a-1}{p-1}.

Subtracting forced excess

Call a contribution heavy if its weight M/mM/m exceeds DD. Define threshold waste and useful supply by

Wt=(Tt−D)+=max⁡(Tt−D,0),V=∑tmin⁡(Tt,D)=∑tTt−∑tWt.W_t=(T_t-D)_+=\max(T_t-D,0),\qquad V=\sum_t\min(T_t,D)=\sum_t T_t-\sum_t W_t.

These are quantities for the cylinder lower-bound constraints. They do not count distinct covered points or identify the actual holes left by the classes coprime to pp.

At a fixed cylinder, suppose there are h≥1h\ge1 heavy contributions of weights w1,…,wh>Dw_1,\ldots,w_h>D. All other contributions are nonnegative. At least one heavy contribution is present, each exceeds DD, and all weights are positive. Thus Tt≥∑ℓ=1hwℓ>DT_t\ge\sum_{\ell=1}^h w_\ell>D, and hence

Wt=Tt−D≥∑ℓ=1hwℓ−D=∑ℓ=1h(wℓ−D)+(h−1)D≥∑ℓ=1h(wℓ−D).W_t=T_t-D \ge\sum_{\ell=1}^h w_\ell-D =\sum_{\ell=1}^h(w_\ell-D)+(h-1)D \ge\sum_{\ell=1}^h(w_\ell-D).

The last inequality uses (h−1)D≥0(h-1)D\ge0, since D>0D>0.

If h=0h=0, the last sum is empty and equals zero, and Wt≥0W_t\ge0 gives the same lower bound. Thus any overlap between heavy contributions preserves the bound. Contributions of weight at most DD cannot decrease WtW_t.

Each heavy class of modulus pjmp^jm contributes its forced excess M/m−DM/m-D on exactly pa−jp^{a-j} cylinders. Summing the last inequality over all cylinders yields

∑tWt≥∑1≤j≤a, m∣MM/m>D(M/m−D)pa−j.\sum_t W_t\ge \sum_{\substack{1\le j\le a,\ m\mid M\\M/m>D}} (M/m-D)p^{a-j}.

Combining this with the total supply gives V≤UV\le U. The equivalent formula for UU in the statement follows by applying w−(w−D)+=min⁡(w,D)w-(w-D)_+=\min(w,D) separately to every weight w=M/mw=M/m in the finite sum.

If every cylinder meets its necessary load Tt≥DT_t\ge D, then min⁡(Tt,D)=D\min(T_t,D)=D in all pap^a cylinders, so

Dpa=V≤U.Dp^a=V\le U.

This contradicts U<DpaU<Dp^a. Therefore that strict inequality rules out every full-profile placement satisfying even the cylinder mass constraints, and in particular rules out every full-profile cover.

Distinct subprofiles and the guards

Suppose a family with pairwise distinct nonunit moduli dividing NN were a cover. Add one arbitrarily placed residue class for each unused nonunit divisor of NN. The resulting full profile still covers, and no cylinder incidence mass has decreased. This contradicts the full-profile exclusion. The same argument shows directly that feasibility of the cylinder lower bounds is upward closed under adding missing classes. A cover of higher multiplicity is also a one-cover and is excluded in this domain. Repeated moduli are not subprofiles of the full inventory, so the argument makes no assertion about them.

If D≤0D\le0, the constant contribution S−MS-M is already at least MM, and these full-profile cylinder lower bounds supply no obstruction. For D>0D>0, the proof only gives Dpa≤UDp^a\le U as a necessary condition. Equality or the reverse strict inequality therefore does not decide feasibility or coverage.

For the boundary M=1M=1, the divisor sum is S=1S=1 and D=1D=1. There are no nonunit moduli coprime to pp, and every class of modulus pjp^j has weight one. There are no heavy terms. Thus

Upa=∑j=1ap−j=1−p−ap−1<1,\frac{U}{p^a}=\sum_{j=1}^a p^{-j} =\frac{1-p^{-a}}{p-1}<1,

because p≥2p\ge2. The strict criterion applies at every depth a≥1a\ge1, including a=1a=1, and excludes distinct nonunit-divisor covers of a pure prime-power frame. No finite enumeration is used.