Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Proof of the butterfly triangle degree-sum bound
Exact parameters and realization
Put and set
The five positive proportions sum to one. Let be an integer, and put . Make five independent parts with sizes . In a part whose weight numerator is , label the vertices by $(j,z,t)\in{1,\ldots,w}\times\mathbb Z/M\mathbb Z \times{1,\ldots,s}$.
Put in every edge between , between , between and between . Between and , join two vertices exactly when modulo belongs to . Between and , use the analogous condition modulo . There are no other edges.
For each fixed vertex in , exactly of the residue classes in are neighbors. Each class has vertices. The same count in the opposite direction gives exactly neighbors for each vertex in . Thus the graph has density exactly , and every vertex in either part has exactly that proportion of the other part as neighbors. The identical argument gives density and equal degrees on each side of .
All degrees, divided by , are consequently
The normalized edge count is
Because the parts are independent, each triangle uses three distinct parts. The only triangles in the six-edge support on the five part labels are and . Their degree sums, divided by , are respectively
Both are strictly less than . This proves the claimed construction at every order divisible by .
Every sufficiently large order
For arbitrary set and , construct the preceding graph on vertices, and add isolated vertices. Then , so
The last strict inequality is an exact rational inequality, checked in the linked evidence. Adding isolates creates no triangles and changes no old degree. Every triangle therefore has degree sum at most .
Finally , and both sides of are positive. Subtracting proves . Hence a fixed positive gap separates the construction from the proposed constant. No function tending to zero can repair that asymptotic lower bound.
Scope and evidence
The definition of minimizes the largest triangle degree sum over all graphs with more than edges. The displayed graphs are in exactly that class, and give for every . Isolated vertices are allowed by the problem. The proof uses neither a random graph limit nor a rounding claim with an unspecified error.
The retained arithmetic evidence checks the exact input and displayed rational inequalities. The graph realization and all-order deduction are the analytic argument above.