Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Proof of restricted difference-basis convergence
Write for the minimum in the statement. This minimum exists because the full interval is a permissible set.
Fix an integer and choose a set of size whose differences contain .
External premises and prime choice
Singer's perfect difference-set theorem gives, for every prime and , a set of size such that represents every residue modulo . Its statement is the consumed premise; its projective-geometric proof is not independently reconstructed here.
The prime number theorem implies that the largest prime at most is as . Indeed, for each fixed , . Choose the largest prime with . Then
Here is fixed while tends to infinity. The same prime-number-theorem input is stated in Section II of the Erdős–Gál account. Neither classical theorem is claimed as a locally verified source proof.
The lifted interval
Put . It lies in and has at most elements. We claim that every integer belongs to .
Write with . If , use any twice and a difference , where ; this includes . If , then . Choose with . The range of the representatives forces or . In the first case use a difference from , and in the second use . Both are available. Thus is a difference of two members of in either case.
The endpoint patch
Set , and . For fixed and sufficiently large ,
because and . Consequently every mark in
lies in . For a fixed , subtracting from covers every integer in . These intervals join without gaps, and , so their union contains . Moreover,
The second inequality follows from and . The set is therefore a restricted difference basis for , and
Dividing by and taking the limit superior proves
Convergence and the infimum
Taking in (1) makes the limit superior finite. Let , and take such that . Apply (1) separately for each fixed , then let tend to infinity. Its right side tends to , so the limit superior is at most the limit inferior. The finite limit exists.
For each , (1) gives . These right sides themselves tend to as , proving
The construction supplies no cost-free coverage of , so it does not prove the different infimum formula without the additive two.