Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


This is a complete author-recorded proof of L216.

The block law and its pair moments

Partition the cycle ZN\mathbb Z_N into B≥3B\ge3 consecutive blocks of lengths ℓb∈{Q,Q+1}\ell_b\in\{Q,Q+1\}, where Q=⌊N/B⌋≥2Q=\lfloor N/B\rfloor\ge2. Choose integer occupancies mb∈{⌊k/B⌋,⌈k/B⌉}m_b\in\{\lfloor k/B\rfloor,\lceil k/B\rceil\} summing to kk, with 0≤mb≤ℓb0\le m_b\le\ell_b. Independently choose a uniform mbm_b-subset of each block, take their union, and rotate it by an independent uniform element of ZN\mathbb Z_N. Read the resulting set in {0,…,N−1}\{0,\ldots,N-1\}. This always has exactly kk points.

Put y=k/Ny=k/N and let pt=mb/ℓbp_t=m_b/\ell_b when tt lies in block bb. Set

cb=pb(1−pb)ℓb−1,pb=mbℓb.c_b=\frac{p_b(1-p_b)}{\ell_b-1},\qquad p_b=\frac{m_b}{\ell_b}.

Before rotation, two different positions in the same block have joint inclusion probability pb2−cbp_b^2-c_b; positions in different blocks have joint probability ptpt′p_t p_{t'}. Hence after rotation the one-point probability is yy, and the two-point probability at cyclic separation d≠0d\ne0 is

X(d)=1N∑t∈ZNptpt+d−1N∑bcbnb(d),(1)X(d)=\frac1N\sum_{t\in\mathbb Z_N}p_t p_{t+d} -\frac1N\sum_b c_b n_b(d), \tag{1}

where nb(d)n_b(d) counts positions tt for which both tt and t+dt+d lie in block bb. In particular, if 1≤d<Q1\le d<Q and 2Q+1<N2Q+1<N, then nb(d)=ℓb−d≥Q−dn_b(d)=\ell_b-d\ge Q-d.

The average of pt−yp_t-y is zero. Since ∣mb−k/B∣≤1|m_b-k/B|\le1 and ∣ℓb−N/B∣≤1|\ell_b-N/B|\le1,

∣pt−y∣≤1+yQ≤2Qwhen y≤1.|p_t-y|\le\frac{1+y}{Q}\le\frac2Q\quad\text{when }y\le1.

Applying Cauchy--Schwarz to the cyclic correlation of these errors gives

1N∑tptpt+d≤y2+4Q2.(2)\frac1N\sum_t p_t p_{t+d}\le y^2+\frac4{Q^2}. \tag{2}

Suppose A0=y(1−y)−2/Q>0A_0=y(1-y)-2/Q>0. Because ∣pb−y∣≤2/Q|p_b-y|\le2/Q, pb(1−pb)≥y(1−y)−2/Qp_b(1-p_b)\ge y(1-y)-2/Q: the map v↦v(1−v)v\mapsto v(1-v) is 11-Lipschitz on [0,1][0,1]. Also ℓb−1≤Q\ell_b-1\le Q. Thus (1)--(2) imply

X(d)≤y2+4Q2−B(Q−d)NQA0(1≤d<Q),(3)X(d)\le y^2+\frac4{Q^2} -\frac{B(Q-d)}{NQ}A_0\quad(1\le d<Q), \tag{3}

and X(d)≤y2+4/Q2X(d)\le y^2+4/Q^2 for every 1≤d<N1\le d<N. The ordinary difference count consequently satisfies ErA(d)=(N−d)X(d)\mathbb E r_A(d)=(N-d)X(d).

Explicit estimates for every large interval

Let u=N1/4≥32u=N^{1/4}\ge32, B=⌊u⌋B=\lfloor u\rfloor, Q=⌊N/B⌋Q=\lfloor N/B\rfloor, and assume

u2≤k≤u2+u2−10.u^2\le k\le u^2+\frac u2-10.

The indicated occupancies exist: mb≤k/B+1≤3u<Qm_b\le k/B+1\le3u<Q, while mb≥0m_b\ge0. We have B≤uB\le u, B≥u−1B\ge u-1, Q≥u3−1Q\ge u^3-1, BQ≤NBQ\le N and 2Q+1<N2Q+1<N. The elementary estimates

y≥u−2,y≤2u−2,y2≤2u−4,2BQ≤3u−2,4NQ2≤5u−2(4)y\ge u^{-2},\quad y\le2u^{-2},\quad y^2\le2u^{-4}, \quad \frac{2B}{Q}\le3u^{-2},\quad \frac{4N}{Q^2}\le5u^{-2} \tag{4}

hold for u≥32u\ge32. They also give A0≥u−2−3u−3−2u−4>0A_0\ge u^{-2}-3u^{-3}-2u^{-4}>0.

Put w=k2−Nw=k^2-N. Since 0≤k−u2≤u/2−100\le k-u^2\le u/2-10,

0≤w≤u3−794u2−10u+100≤u3−794u2.(5)0\le w\le u^3-\frac{79}{4}u^2-10u+100 \le u^3-\frac{79}{4}u^2. \tag{5}

For 1≤d<Q1\le d<Q, multiply (3) by N−dN-d, bound N−d≥N−QN-d\ge N-Q in its nonnegative subtracted term, and use (N−d)y2≤1+(w−d)/N(N-d)y^2\le1+(w-d)/N. This gives the affine upper bound

ErA(d)≤U(d):=1+w−dN+4NQ2−(1−QN)BA0(1−dQ).(6)\mathbb E r_A(d)\le U(d):= 1+\frac{w-d}{N}+\frac{4N}{Q^2} -\left(1-\frac QN\right)B A_0\left(1-\frac dQ\right). \tag{6}

It is enough to check d=0,Qd=0,Q. First,

(1−QN)BA0≥By−By2−2BQ−BQNy≥u−1−7u−2,(7)\left(1-\frac QN\right)B A_0 \ge By-By^2-\frac{2B}{Q}-\frac{BQ}{N}y \ge u^{-1}-7u^{-2}, \tag{7}

using (4), By≥u−1−u−2By\ge u^{-1}-u^{-2} and 2u−3≤u−22u^{-3}\le u^{-2}. Equations (4)--(7) yield

U(0)≤1−314u−2,U(Q)≤1−594u−2+u−4≤1−14u−2.U(0)\le1-\frac{31}{4}u^{-2},\qquad U(Q)\le1-\frac{59}{4}u^{-2}+u^{-4} \le1-14u^{-2}.

Thus ErA(d)≤1−7u−2\mathbb E r_A(d)\le1-7u^{-2} for 1≤d<Q1\le d<Q. For d≥Qd\ge Q, omit the nonnegative depletion in (1) and use

(N−d)X(d)≤(N−Q)(y2+4/Q2)≤U(Q).(N-d)X(d)\le(N-Q)(y^2+4/Q^2)\le U(Q).

This proves every difference capacity, with the stated margin.

For any integer ss, there are at most N/2N/2 pairs i<ji<j with i+j=si+j=s and at most one diagonal pair. Therefore

EσA(s)≤k22N+2NQ2+y≤12+12u+92u2<34.(8)\mathbb E\sigma_A(s) \le\frac{k^2}{2N}+\frac{2N}{Q^2}+y \le\frac12+\frac1{2u}+\frac{9}{2u^2}<\frac34. \tag{8}

This proves the theorem for k≥Nk\ge\sqrt N. For smaller positive kk, first construct the law at K=⌈N⌉K=\lceil\sqrt N\rceil, which lies in the permitted range because u≥32u\ge32, and choose a uniform kk-subset of its set. Each pair probability is multiplied by k(k−1)/(K(K−1))≤1k(k-1)/(K(K-1))\le1 and each one-point probability by k/K≤1k/K\le1. Both kinds of capacities therefore remain at most one.

An exact infinite family

For an integer s≥2s\ge2, put

B0=s2−s+1,W=sB0,N=sW,k=s2.B_0=s^2-s+1,\qquad W=sB_0,\qquad N=sW,\qquad k=s^2.

Use ss equal blocks of length WW, with ss points in each, and rotate. Here y=s/W=1/B0y=s/W=1/B_0 and the pair moment is exactly

X(d)=y2−λmax⁡(W−r(d),0),λ=y−y2W(W−1),r(d)=min⁡(d,N−d).(9)X(d)=y^2-\lambda\max(W-r(d),0),\qquad \lambda=\frac{y-y^2}{W(W-1)},\qquad r(d)=\min(d,N-d). \tag{9}

For s=2s=2 the same formula holds with W=N/2W=N/2: the two possible orientations inside a half-cycle are disjoint. For s>2s>2 it follows directly by counting the rotations which place both points in the same block.

Writing w=k2−N=W−sw=k^2-N=W-s, one has λ≥N−2\lambda\ge N^{-2}. Indeed this is equivalent to W(W−1)≤s3(W−s)W(W-1)\le s^3(W-s), whose right side minus left side equals

s((s−2)(s3−s2+s)+1)>0.s\bigl((s-2)(s^3-s^2+s)+1\bigr)>0.

For d<Wd<W, (9) gives

(N−d)X(d)≤(N−d)(N−s+d)N2<1.(N-d)X(d)\le\frac{(N-d)(N-s+d)}{N^2}<1.

For d≥Wd\ge W, omit the depletion and use (N−d)y2≤(N−W)(N+w)/N2<1(N-d)y^2\le(N-W)(N+w)/N^2<1, since w<Ww<W. The sum-capacity bound is Ny2/2+y=(s2+2)/(2B0)≤1Ny^2/2+y=(s^2+2)/(2B_0)\le1 for s≥2s\ge2. Finally,

N=s2−s2+38+O(s−1),N1/4=s−14+O(s−1),\sqrt N=s^2-\frac s2+\frac38+O(s^{-1}),\qquad N^{1/4}=s-\frac14+O(s^{-1}),

so (k−N)/N1/4→1/2(k-\sqrt N)/N^{1/4}\to1/2.

Certificate consequence

More explicitly, suppose nonnegative numbers αd,βs\alpha_d,\beta_s, a real γ\gamma, and a function Ψ\Psi on the kk-subsets satisfy, for every such subset,

Ψ(A)≤∑dαdrA(d)+∑sβsσA(s)+γ,Ψ(A)>∑dαd+∑sβs+γ.\Psi(A)\le\sum_d\alpha_dr_A(d)+\sum_s\beta_s\sigma_A(s)+\gamma, \qquad \Psi(A)>\sum_d\alpha_d+\sum_s\beta_s+\gamma.

Taking expectations under the constructed law contradicts these two inequalities. The first inequality may use any facts valid for all kk-subsets, including integrality, arbitrary-degree positivity and combinatorial restrictions. Its obstruction is specifically the linear use of the Sidon capacities. A proof using a disjunction of certificates depending on the set is not asserted to have this form.