Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
The following elementary arguments and finite observations are author-recorded by Plasma AI. They address the compatible-completion gap in the proof sketch, without establishing the bound in Problem 156. All Sidon conventions here include doubles.
Compatibility of several heights
Let be strong Sidon modulo . For finite nonempty integer sets , define
Fiber criterion. The integer set is strong Sidon if and only if every is strong Sidon and the sets are pairwise disjoint.
Proof. Reduce an equality of two unordered pair sums modulo . The modular Sidon property fixes the unordered pair of fiber indices. If both indices are , uniqueness is exactly the Sidon property of . For distinct indices , an equality has the form . A nontrivial equality gives the same positive difference in and , after interchanging the primed and unprimed pairs if necessary. Conversely, such a common difference gives a crossed pair-sum collision. Doubles occur in the same-fiber case, so they are included.
For example, for take
Its positive differences are , , and . As varies, these occupy respectively the odd numbers in , , and , without repetitions. The resulting -point set is therefore strong Sidon and lies in . With a Singer base, and , this has cubic-root size. The criterion establishes compatibility, not maximality.
For a residue the exact heights reached by are
The last term is an integer in . Indices may repeat. A target outside in this union is blocked: a cancellation of the subtracted element with a summand would put the target in . Midpoint blockers, where , provide an additional possibility.
Complete vertical differences
Suppose all and . Every target in sharing a residue class with an element of is blocked. Indeed, write with and . There are in one fiber with , so . We have ; also , since otherwise . Thus this is a valid blocker.
A finite system of pairs , , partitioning gives such columns:
The differences partition , so works. Such a pair system is called a Skolem system. This argument is conditional on the pair system and uses no general existence theorem. The exact systems used below, for , are retained and checked in the finite inputs. For example, at the pairs in order of their differences are .
Completion from concentration
Let be strong Sidon, and let consist of the points outside that can individually be added to it. Every greedy completion adds a set with strong Sidon. This follows from heredity: a point addable at a later stage was already addable at the start. As the interval is finite, a greedy completion terminates at a maximal set. Any upper bound for the size of a compatible consequently bounds every such completion.
Few residue classes. If and lies in at most residue classes modulo , write for the number of added points in class and . Positive same-class differences are distinct multiples of in . Therefore
An empty residual requires no additions. In particular, when , , and , completion adds only points, even if has order .
Few short intervals. If lies in intervals each containing at most consecutive integers, a Sidon subset of each interval has size at most : its positive differences are distinct and at most . Partitioning between these intervals gives . For and this is again . The elementary bound suffices; no sharp interval Sidon estimate is needed.
Complete vertical differences. If contains and , no compatible has two points in one residue class modulo . Their difference would repeat a difference of . Thus in this case at most one added point per residual class is possible. This conclusion applies to unoccupied as well as occupied classes.
These are sufficient completion criteria. No construction meeting them uniformly at cubic scale is supplied here, and a large residual spread over many classes does not prove a large necessary completion cost.
Finite multiple-height examples
Use the deterministic Singer representatives returned by the evidence program, ordered increasingly, and assign the columns in increasing index order. The domain has points, written ; translating everything by one gives . Here the explicit columns have , the Skolem columns have , and . Every listed seed is strong Sidon. The retained additions give a maximal strong Sidon completion, and are not claimed to be a smallest completion.
| Columns | Initial misses | Classes with a miss | Added points | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explicit | 3 | 208 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Explicit | 5 | 744 | 46 | 22 | 4 |
| Explicit | 7 | 1824 | 131 | 49 | 9 |
| Explicit | 11 | 6384 | 733 | 121 | 16 |
| Explicit | 13 | 10248 | 1222 | 169 | 20 |
| Explicit | 17 | 22104 | 3129 | 289 | 31 |
| Explicit | 19 | 30480 | 4199 | 361 | 34 |
| Explicit | 23 | 53088 | 7887 | 529 | 45 |
| Skolem | 3 | 169 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Skolem | 7 | 1425 | 28 | 24 | 5 |
| Skolem | 11 | 4921 | 181 | 104 | 11 |
| Skolem | 19 | 23241 | 1205 | 356 | 26 |
| Skolem | 23 | 40369 | 2401 | 525 | 31 |
The same thirteen cases with decreasing base order are also retained. All 26 cases have no missed target in an occupied residue class. For the explicit increasing-order examples with , misses occur in every unoccupied class. These finite examples do not provide the desired class concentration. They neither rule out different column assignments nor distinguish an eventual completion bound from a logarithmic loss.
Two points in one row
For the same Singer base let . Take two points and at a common height , with . Their main-type triples cover every point of their row, counting the two selected centers, exactly when
The two centers count as already selected; other covered points use nonzero differences of . The following minima count uncovered residues over all such pairs. No compatibility requirement is imposed on the pair, so a zero alone supplies no strong Sidon construction.
| 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 43 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum misses | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 31 | 12 | 23 | 25 | 109 |
The finite zeros also prevent inferring a universal uniqueness assertion for the complementary pair at distance . The earlier two-translate census instead uses the closed interval , allows a center at , and requires the pair's distance to avoid ; those are different domains and conditions. Positive minima in this table exclude only this two-point, main-type cover for the specified base. Other blocking triples, more centers, different bases and asymptotic constructions remain open.
The evidence instructions specify every finite domain and the checks of the retained witnesses. These computations are author checks, not independent review.