Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
L274 is Plasma AI's complete author-recorded theorem, at tier 0 without independent review. For every , the first and second moments of any genuine law on -subsets of extend to real signed moments through degree four satisfying every strong-Sidon zero and every local cardinality identity. For , the extension can also preserve exactly the genuine variance of . Positivity of the full moment matrix is not part of the theorem.
The proof uses inclusion matrices between Sidon - and -sets. Elementary Gram identities give and . Thus every required row datum has a signed preimage. The proof also identifies the exact restriction of zero-three-margin functions to forbidden four-sets: their sums must vanish on the four-sets containing each forbidden triple. The putative square inverse in the [[research/sidon_extremal_error/local_repair_gap|local-kernel construction]] is singular because it ignores these relations. This does not obstruct a compatible global repair.
If is prescribed on forbidden triples, its complementary correction on Sidon triples can be chosen with Euclidean norm at most . If is prescribed on forbidden four-sets and meets the compatibility equations, the corresponding bound is . These are bounds on moment vectors, with all supports counted once. They do not bound the smallest eigenvalue of the quadratic moment matrix after correction.
A signed trade supported on the sixteen four-sets selecting one element from each pair in changes the alternating square while preserving every linear constraint. Its full eight-point support is Sidon; the proof lists all positive differences. This explains why the negative parity square of the zeroing rule is a defect of that rule rather than an obstruction to all signed linear extensions. The trade may harm other squares.
The remaining task is a matrix-positive extension, with control suited to all quadratic test polynomials. A localized version of the global inverse, or another quantitatively controlled correction, could be useful for that task. The proof sketch keeps it separate from the upper and all- lower estimates for Problem 30.