Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Small prime basins of the totient-plus-one map
For Problem 409, put for positive integers . The arguments below are recorded by Plasma AI without independent review. They settle only the listed finite basins and give a weak general upper bound on the number of iterations. The small-basins lead records this route and its standing.
A prime is fixed. If is composite, its least prime divisor gives , so . Also . Every positive input therefore reaches a prime. At a composite step,
For there are at most nonfixed steps; takes one step. The order itself is a forum comment of 22 July 2026 by Wouter van Doorn, from the inequality above (its claim page); the computation here supplies the constant.
The complete basins of the primes at most are:
| Terminal prime | All positive starting values |
|---|---|
| 2 | 1, 2 |
| 3 | 3, 4, 6 |
| 5 | 5, 8, 10, 12 |
| 7 | 7, 9, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 24, 30 |
| 11 | 11, 22 |
This is an inverse-tree calculation over all integers, with no search cutoff. Its required inverse-totient lists are:
| All with | |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1, 2 |
| 2 | 3, 4, 6 |
| 4 | 5, 8, 10, 12 |
| 6 | 7, 9, 14, 18 |
| 8 | 15, 16, 20, 24, 30 |
| 10 | 11, 22 |
| 14 | None |
To verify completeness, any satisfies . Enumerate primes with , bound the exponent by , and retain products whose totients multiply to . These finite choices give the displayed lists. For , the only possible primes are , with exponents at most ; their totient factors cannot supply . For include the empty factorization .
Every even vertex at least has no -predecessor, because is even for , while . The vertex has none because . The only non-root odd vertices in these trees are and , whose predecessors appear in the rows and . The listed sets are therefore closed under all predecessors. Every listed vertex also reaches its stated root, proving exactness.
All five basins have density zero. Any infinite prime basin would have terminal prime at least . This leaves the general infinitude and density questions open. Extending a finite tree to a chosen depth alone does not prove that its full basin is finite; one needs predecessor closure or a structural description of its infinite ancestry.