Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

A lower-dimensional compression for large cyclic quotients


This is a proved reduction, not a resolution of the target. It applies to any finite positive real set, without a hypothesis on its rational rank.

The quotient associated with a nearly maximum subset

Let P⊂R>0P\subset\mathbb R_{>0} be finite, let d=d(P)≥2d=d(P)\ge2, and choose a dissociated D⊆PD\subseteq P of size d−1d-1. Put

L=⟨P⟩Z,LD=⟨D⟩Z,G=L/LD.L=\langle P\rangle_{\mathbb Z},\qquad L_D=\langle D\rangle_{\mathbb Z},\qquad G=L/L_D.

If G≠0G\ne0, it is cyclic, and the nonzero images of the elements of PP comprise a single signed class {g,−g}\{g,-g\}.

Indeed, take h,h′∈Ph,h'\in P with nonzero images. For distinct h,h′h,h', the d+1d+1 elements of D∪{h,h′}D\cup\{h,h'\} have a ternary relation. It must use both h,h′h,h': a relation using neither contradicts dissociation of DD, and a relation using just one cannot vanish in GG. Thus their images are equal or opposite. These images generate GG, proving the assertion. The case of only one nonzero image is immediate.

Compression theorem

Suppose GG is infinite or has order q>d+1q>d+1. Then there is a finite positive real set CC such that

d(C)≤d−1,∣C∣≥∣P∣−12.(1)d(C)\le d-1,\qquad |C|\ge\frac{|P|-1}{2}. \tag{1}

The compressed set need not be a subset of PP.

Let Q=P∩LDQ=P\cap L_D. Change individual signs of the elements of P∖QP\setminus Q so that their images are all gg, and call the resulting set HH. These sign changes preserve dissociation and do not identify elements: the original set was positive. Also H∩QH\cap Q is empty, since their quotient images differ. Let h0=min⁡Hh_0=\min H in the real order, and put

Δ={h−h0:h∈H∖{h0}},C=Q∪Δ.\Delta=\{h-h_0:h\in H\setminus\{h_0\}\},\qquad C=Q\cup\Delta.

All elements of CC are positive, and

∣C∣≥max⁡{∣Q∣,∣H∣−1}≥∣P∣−12.|C|\ge\max\{|Q|,|H|-1\}\ge\frac{|P|-1}{2}.

Suppose, to obtain a contradiction, that B⊆CB\subseteq C is a dissociated dd-set. For every element of B∩QB\cap Q, use its original representative in QQ. For an element b∈B∖Qb\in B\setminus Q, use h0+b∈Hh_0+b\in H. Thus elements in Q∩ΔQ\cap\Delta are assigned to QQ. These dd representatives are distinct, and none equals h0h_0. Adjoin h0h_0.

A ternary relation on these d+1d+1 points projects to sg=0s g=0, where ss is the sum of the coefficients on the points of HH, including h0h_0. Since ∣s∣≤d+1|s|\le d+1, the order hypothesis forces s=0s=0. Subtracting the resulting zero multiple of h0h_0 turns the original relation into a ternary relation on BB. Dissociation of BB makes all its coefficients zero, and then s=0s=0 makes the coefficient of h0h_0 zero. The d+1d+1 lifted points are therefore dissociated, contradicting d(P)=dd(P)=d. This proves (1).

Consequence for a minimal counterexample

Assume the desired positive-set bound has been established in dimensions at most d−1d-1. Applying it to CC gives

∣P∣≤2∣C∣+1≤2(2d−1−1)+1=2d−1.|P|\le2|C|+1\le2(2^{d-1}-1)+1=2^d-1.

Consequently, in a counterexample of minimum dissociation dimension, every dissociated (d−1)(d-1)-subset DD generates either all of LL, or a subgroup of cyclic index at most d+1d+1. In particular, every such DD must span the full rational span of PP.

The argument works in the universal rational lift from the intrinsic-rank note as well. Use its real evaluation ff to choose the minimum in HH, and form the positive real set

f(Q)∪{f(h)−f(h0):h∈H∖{h0}}.f(Q)\cup\{f(h)-f(h_0):h\in H\setminus\{h_0\}\}.

The two sets separately retain cardinalities ∣Q∣|Q| and ∣H∣−1|H|-1, because evaluation is injective on the signed original columns. Assign points in their intersection to QQ, as before. Any real ternary relation on the selected original signed columns is also a zero relation in the universal lift. Projection therefore gives s=0s=0; evaluating after subtracting sh0s h_0 contradicts dissociation of the selected compressed real set. No claim that evaluation preserves all relations on arbitrary compressed vectors is needed.

Exact limitation

If the cyclic quotient has order q≤d+1q\le d+1, a relation on the lifted points can have a nonzero coefficient sum s∈qZs\in q\mathbb Z. Translation then leaves sh0s h_0, rather than a zero multiple of the pivot. If LD=LL_D=L, there is no quotient restriction at all. Neither case is covered by the proof. The primitive and small-index cases are not excluded by the known rank-defect bounds, and no induction closing them is proved here.

One stronger sufficient assertion would be that every positive PP admits a positive set CC satisfying (1), without the quotient hypothesis. This assertion is unproved; it is not an established general compression principle.

A sharper restriction for a least-dimensional odd failure

Assume the stronger positive odd bound holds in dimensions below dd, and let OO be a violating positive odd integer set of dimension dd. The established small cases give d≥5d\ge5. Divide by its (odd) common gcd, so gcd⁡(O)=1\gcd(O)=1. For every dissociated (d−1)(d-1)-subset D⊂OD\subset O, put q=gcd⁡(D)q=\gcd(D). Then

q=1orq≤d−1.(2)\boxed{q=1\quad\hbox{or}\quad q\le d-1.} \tag{2}

Since qq is odd, for odd dd the upper bound is actually d−2d-2. This improves the general cutoff d+1d+1, but does not exclude the primitive case.

Suppose q>1q>1. By the quotient argument above, all nonzero residues of OO modulo qq are ±g\pm g, where gcd⁡(g,q)=1\gcd(g,q)=1. Let Q=O∩qZQ=O\cap q\mathbb Z, and change signs of the other elements to obtain a set HH with constant residue gg. Put

h0=min⁡H,Δ={h−h0:h∈H∖{h0}}.h_0=\min H,\qquad \Delta=\{h-h_0:h\in H\setminus\{h_0\}\}.

The set Δ\Delta is positive and even; HH itself need not be positive. Any dissociated subset of QQ can be extended by an element of HH, so d(Q)≤d−1d(Q)\le d-1 and ∣Q∣≤2d−2|Q|\le2^{d-2}. If d(Δ)≤d−2d(\Delta)\le d-2, the lower-dimensional positive bound (deduced from the assumed odd bounds by valuation layers) gives

∣H∣=∣Δ∣+1≤2d−2,|H|=|\Delta|+1\le2^{d-2},

contradicting ∣O∣>2d−1|O|>2^{d-1}.

Thus choose a dissociated (d−1)(d-1)-subset B⊂ΔB\subset\Delta, and let K={h0}∪(h0+B)⊂HK=\{h_0\}\cup(h_0+B)\subset H. For any a∈Qa\in Q, the d+1d+1 elements of K∪{a}K\cup\{a\} are dependent. In a ternary relation write ss for the sum of the coefficients on KK. Reduction modulo qq gives s∈qZs\in q\mathbb Z.

If s=0s=0, reduction modulo two forces the coefficient of aa to be zero. Subtracting sh0s h_0 then gives a relation on BB, which is trivial; the coefficient of h0h_0 is zero as well. Consequently 0<∣s∣≤d0<|s|\le d. This excludes q>dq>d.

If q=dq=d, then dd is odd and s=±ds=\pm d, so all KK coefficients have the same sign. Parity forces the coefficient of aa to be nonzero, and hence

a=∣∑h∈Kh∣.a=\left|\sum_{h\in K}h\right|.

Only one positive aa can satisfy this, whereas QQ contains the d−1d-1 distinct elements of DD. This excludes q=dq=d and proves (2).

There is a further boundary restriction. If dd is even and q=d−1q=d-1, then s=±(d−1)s=\pm(d-1). Among dd coefficients from {−1,0,1}\{-1,0,1\}, this requires exactly one zero and all other coefficients to have the same sign. Parity again forces the coefficient of aa to be nonzero. Thus

Q⊆{∣∑u∈Ku−h∣:h∈K},d−1≤∣Q∣≤d.(3)Q\subseteq \left\{\left|\sum_{u\in K}u-h\right|:h\in K\right\}, \qquad d-1\le |Q|\le d. \tag{3}

Neither (2) nor (3) excludes a least-dimensional failure of the strong odd bound.