Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Restrictions on a deficient color family


Let PP be positive, D⊆PD\subseteq P maximum dissociated, d=∣D∣d=|D|, S=Σ(D)S=\Sigma(D), and T=∑DT=\sum D. Color every edge {s,s+a}⊂S\{s,s+a\}\subset S by a∈Pa\in P. For C⊆PC\subseteq P, let H=(S,E(C))H=(S,E(C)) and let r(H)r(H) be its graphic rank, including isolated vertices in the component count.

The forest criterion asks whether some maximum DD always satisfies r(H)≥∣C∣r(H)\ge|C|. The results below restrict deficient families; they do not establish that criterion.

Distinct unsigned supports contribute independent edges

Let U(C)\mathcal U(C) be the family of distinct unsigned supports of all ternary representations on DD of colors in CC. Then

r(H)≥∣U(C)∣.(1)r(H)\ge|\mathcal U(C)|. \tag{1}

For each support I∈U(C)I\in\mathcal U(C), choose one representation. Its possible upper endpoints form a face FIF_I of the subset cube: coordinates in the positive support are fixed to one, coordinates in the negative support to zero, and all remaining coordinates are free.

Any family of cube faces with distinct fixed-coordinate sets has a system of distinct vertex representatives. To check Hall's condition, take any subfamily and downward-compress its union successively in every coordinate. The compressed union contains the downward-compressed image of each individual face: fixed one coordinates become zero, fixed zero coordinates remain zero, and free coordinates remain free. Compression preserves the cardinality of the union. The final union contains, for each II, the distinct vertex 1[d]∖I\mathbf1_{[d]\setminus I}. Its original cardinality is therefore at least the number of faces. This applies to every subfamily.

Choose the corresponding difference edge at each selected upper endpoint. These edges form a forest, since an undirected cycle would have two edges entering its greatest vertex. Their colors can repeat, which does not affect graphic rank. This proves (1).

Thus every graphic-rank-deficient family is also deficient for unsigned-support matching. The converse does not follow, as the existing full-support matching counterexamples demonstrate.

The whole upward closure contributes independent edges

Let U↑(C)\mathcal U^\uparrow(C) be the family of all J⊆DJ\subseteq D containing at least one member of U(C)\mathcal U(C). The same argument in fact proves

r(H)≥∣U↑(C)∣.(1a)r(H)\ge|\mathcal U^\uparrow(C)|. \tag{1a}

For each such JJ, choose a representation with support I(J)⊆JI(J)\subseteq J. Its upper-endpoint face, after downward compression, contains 1D∖J\mathbf1_{D\setminus J}. These vertices are distinct as JJ varies, even if several chosen faces coincide. Applying compression to each subfamily verifies Hall. The distinct upper endpoints again give a forest.

If τ\tau is the minimum size of a set of coordinates meeting every representation support, the largest support-free coordinate set has size d−τd-\tau. Every coordinate set of larger size therefore belongs to U↑(C)\mathcal U^\uparrow(C), so

r(H)≥∑j=0τ−1(dj)≥2τ−1.(1b)r(H)\ge\sum_{j=0}^{\tau-1}\binom dj\ge2^\tau-1. \tag{1b}

Deleting such a hitting set leaves a dissociated set which each color can extend individually. This does not justify simultaneous extension: combinations of different colors can have new representations on the remaining coordinates. No augmentation from deficiency has been proved.

Every deficient family has rank at least six

For a maximum DD, one has

r(H)<∣C∣⟹r(H)≥6,∣C∣≥7.(2)r(H)<|C|\quad\Longrightarrow\quad r(H)\ge6,\quad |C|\ge7. \tag{2}

Reflection J(s)=T−sJ(s)=T-s is a fixed-point-free automorphism of HH preserving each edge color. In cube coordinates it is complementation. A representation with unsigned support II supplies 2d−∣I∣2^{d-|I|} pairwise vertex-disjoint edges, by translating the endpoint subsets in the zero coordinates.

Suppose r(H)≤5r(H)\le5 and ∣C∣>r(H)|C|>r(H). A component not fixed by JJ is paired with another component of the same size and the same color set. A pair of kk-vertex components contributes rank 2(k−1)2(k-1); hence k≤3k\le3. A paired pair of triangles has at most three colors and rank four, and any remaining rank is at most one. Such components cannot give a deficiency. Two-vertex components have at most one color each. A component fixed by JJ has even order. It follows that a deficient graph of rank at most five must contain a reflection-invariant component of order four or six.

Four vertices

There is only one such component KK; all remaining nontrivial components are t≤2t\le2 isolated edges. After centering at T/2T/2, write

K={−x,−y,y,x},x>y>0.K=\{-x,-y,y,x\},\qquad x>y>0.

Its lengths belong to {2x,2y,x+y,x−y}\{2x,2y,x+y,x-y\}. Since the total rank is 3+t3+t, deficiency forces all four lengths to be distinct and present, and each other edge to have a new color distinct from all the others.

Write the corresponding cube vertices as {p,pc,q,qc}\{p,p^c,q,q^c\}. The two cross-pair length classes have complementary supports I=p△qI=p\triangle q and IcI^c. Each of these colors has exactly two edges in the entire graph. The translated-edge count gives

2d−∣I∣≤2,2∣I∣≤2,2^{d-|I|}\le2,\qquad 2^{|I|}\le2,

so d≤2d\le2. If t>0t>0, there are more than four nonisolated vertices, impossible. If t=0t=0, PP has four distinct positive elements, hence a dissociated triple, contradicting d≤2d\le2. For the last elementary fact, take a<b<c<ea<b<c<e: either {b,c,e}\{b,c,e\} is dissociated, or e=b+ce=b+c, when {a,c,e}\{a,c,e\} is dissociated.

Six vertices

Here r(H)=5r(H)=5, and the six-vertex component KK is the only nontrivial component. Every representation of a color in CC has support at least d−1d-1: two zero coordinates would give four disjoint edges and require eight nonisolated vertices.

There are three complementary pairs in KK. Full-support edges join members of one such pair and give at most three colors. Any other edge has support d−1d-1. It therefore joins two complementary pairs that are adjacent in the folded cube, the quotient of the dd-cube by complementation.

For d≥4d\ge4, the folded cube is triangle-free. A triangle would imply ei+ej+ek∈{0,1}e_i+e_j+e_k\in\{0,\mathbf1\} over F2\mathbb F_2, which is impossible for d≥4d\ge4. Thus the three pairs have at most two adjacencies. Each adjacency supplies at most one permissible color: the other cross-pair length is the basis color did_i, whose 2d−12^{d-1} disjoint canonical edges require more than six vertices. Consequently ∣C∣≤3+2=5|C|\le3+2=5, a contradiction.

For d=3d=3, a basis color has four disjoint canonical edges and therefore cannot belong to CC. Hence

∣P∣≥∣D∣+∣C∣≥3+6=9,|P|\ge|D|+|C|\ge3+6=9,

contrary to the already-proved positive bound ∣P∣≤7|P|\le7 in dimension three. Finally, d≤2d\le2 cannot supply six vertices. This proves (2).

Excluding rank six

In fact every deficient family has rank at least seven. Suppose r(H)=6<∣C∣r(H)=6<|C|. If d≤3d\le3, the proved positive bound gives ∣P∣≤7|P|\le7, so C=PC=P has seven colors; its basis colors connect SS, forcing rank seven. Thus d≥4d\ge4.

A reflection-paired pair of components of order kk has rank 2(k−1)2(k-1) and at most (k2)\binom{k}{2} colors. Under the rank-six budget, such pairs alone cannot be deficient. The remaining possibilities are: a four-vertex invariant component plus three isolated edges; a six-vertex invariant component plus one fixed complement edge; or two invariant four-vertex components.

In the first case deficiency forces four distinct colors in the four-vertex component and three new outside colors. Its two cross colors each have exactly two edges globally. Their complementary supports force d≤2d\le2, as above. In the second case a nonfull representation must have support at least d−1d-1: four disjoint non-complement edges cannot use the fixed complement edge and cannot fit into six vertices. The earlier folded-cube argument gives at most five colors inside and one outside.

In the third case every support has size at least d−2d-2, since only eight vertices are nonisolated. Deficiency forces one component to have all four of its possible colors. Its complementary cross supports both have size at least d−2d-2, giving d≤4d\le4. At d=4d=4, both have size two and each supplies four disjoint edges. Its two edges in the first component force two in the second. Thus both cross colors are shared, and there are at most 4+4−2=64+4-2=6 colors. This excludes rank six.

Excluding rank seven for the maximum-sum choice

If DD maximizes ∑D\sum D among maximum dissociated subsets, every deficient family has rank at least eight.

Call a color exclusively full-support when every representation of it has full support. Replacing any coordinate of DD by such a color preserves dissociation. Maximum sum therefore forces its value to be smaller than min⁡D\min D. The complement orbits carrying these colors are independent in the folded cube: adjacent orbits with absolute full signed sums a,ba,b satisfy 2di=∣±a±b∣2d_i=|\pm a\pm b| for some ii, contrary to a+b<2min⁡D≤2dia+b<2\min D\le2d_i.

The word exclusively is essential. A color with both full and nonfull representations need not allow these exchanges.

Suppose r(H)=7<∣C∣r(H)=7<|C|. Again d≥4d\ge4. Reflection-paired components alone cannot be deficient. The cases with an invariant component smaller than eight vertices are excluded as follows:

  • A four-vertex component plus four isolated edges is handled by the complementary-support argument. A four-vertex component plus paired triangles has at most 4+3=74+3=7 colors.
  • Two invariant four-vertex components plus a fixed edge have at most seven colors. If either component has all four colors, the rank-six argument forces d=4d=4 and both cross colors are shared.
  • A six-vertex component plus two fixed edges gives at most 5+2=75+2=7 colors, since nonfull supports have size at least d−1d-1.
  • If the two outside edges instead form a reflection pair, they carry one color bb. Every other color has all its edges inside the six-vertex component, so its nonfull supports have size at least d−1d-1. The folded-cube argument bounds these colors and the full colors there by five; adding bb cannot cause deficiency.

It remains to treat one invariant eight-vertex component, consisting of four complement orbits. All supports have size at least d−2d-2. Basis colors are absent, since their canonical edges cover at least sixteen vertices.

If all nonfull representations have support d−1d-1, they give at most one color per adjacency among the four folded-cube vertices. Triangle-freeness bounds these colors by four. Deficiency then forces four exclusively full-support colors on the four vertices. There must also be an adjacency, contradicting their independence.

Otherwise a representation omits exactly two coordinates i,ji,j. Its four translated edges exhaust the component, and its four complement orbits form an affine plane with directions ei,eje_i,e_j in F2d/⟨1⟩\mathbb F_2^d/\langle\mathbf1\rangle. For d≥4d\ge4, these are the only coordinate directions in that plane. Hence support-d−1d-1 colors give at most its four square edges, and any support-d−2d-2 representation omits the same two coordinates. The fixed sign pattern is determined by the component up to reversal, giving at most one latter color. Thus at most five colors admit any nonfull representation. Deficiency forces at least three exclusively full-support colors on the four vertices of a square, contradicting independence. Rank seven is excluded.

Minimal deficient families have rainbow alternate paths

Let CC be inclusion-minimal with r(E(C))<∣C∣r(E(C))<|C|. Then, for every a∈Ca\in C,

r(E(C))=∣C∣−1=r(E(C∖{a})).r(E(C))=|C|-1=r(E(C\setminus\{a\})).

Indeed, minimality gives the lower bound ∣C∣−1|C|-1 for the last rank, monotonicity bounds it by r(E(C))r(E(C)), and deficiency gives the opposite upper bound. Inclusion and equal graphic ranks show that deleting any color preserves every connected component.

There is in fact a rainbow alternate path for each edge of color aa, after a suitable forest is chosen. Every subfamily of C∖{a}C\setminus\{a\} satisfies the forest rank criterion proved in the forest note. Hence one may choose a forest FF containing one edge of each of its ∣C∣−1|C|-1 colors. Its rank equals r(E(C))r(E(C)), so it spans the full component partition of E(C)E(C). The endpoints of any aa-edge are joined by a path in FF, and that path has distinct colors, none equal to aa.

This gives a ternary relation among the color values on that cycle, but not the needed exchange with DD. Substitution of representations on DD may have coefficients of absolute value greater than one. No argument turns these cycles into a larger dissociated set or an equally large one of larger sum. Thus this elementary reduction does not establish the maximum-sum forest assertion.

Exact gap

Families of graphic rank at least eight remain untreated for the maximum-sum choice. In particular, the support count (1) does not control multiple colors with the same support. There is no proved exchange or augmentation from a deficient family to a dissociated (d+1)(d+1)-subset. The minimum-sum endpoint counterexample in the matching note still has graphic rank equal to its three colors and does not refute this route.