Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Real coefficient averaging and the rational-coefficient obstruction


Status

The metric theorem below is proved and author-recorded. It concerns rounded real values, not sums of powerful integers. In particular, it supplies no rational or integral coefficient tuple and does not resolve Erdős 940. The finite-core reduction still requires a fixed integral diagonal form.

A log-free averaged estimate

Theorem. Let r≥3r\ge3 be an integer. For Lebesgue-almost every a∈[1,2]r\mathbf a\in[1,2]^r, the set

{⌊∑i=1raixir⌋:x1,…,xr∈N}\left\{\left\lfloor\sum_{i=1}^r a_i x_i^r\right\rfloor: x_1,\ldots,x_r\in\mathbb N\right\}

has positive upper natural density.

For N≥1N\ge1, put

Qa(N)=#{x,y∈[1,N]r∩Zr:∣∑iai(xir−yir)∣≤1}.Q_{\mathbf a}(N)=\#\left\{\mathbf x,\mathbf y\in[1,N]^r\cap\mathbb Z^r: \left|\sum_i a_i(x_i^r-y_i^r)\right|\le1\right\}.

We prove the uniform estimate

∫[1,2]rQa(N) da≪rNr.(1)\int_{[1,2]^r}Q_{\mathbf a}(N)\,d\mathbf a\ll_r N^r. \tag{1}

First, for T≥1T\ge1,

B(N,T):=#{1≤u,v≤N:0<∣ur−vr∣≤T}≪rT2/r.(2)B(N,T):=\#\{1\le u,v\le N:0<|u^r-v^r|\le T\} \ll_r T^{2/r}. \tag{2}

By symmetry suppose u>vu>v. If v≤T1/rv\le T^{1/r}, then ur≤vr+T≤2Tu^r\le v^r+T\le2T, giving Or(T2/r)O_r(T^{2/r}) pairs. Otherwise

ur−vr≥rvr−1(u−v),u^r-v^r\ge r v^{r-1}(u-v),

so summing the upper bound T/(rvr−1)T/(rv^{r-1}) over v>T1/rv>T^{1/r} proves (2). Here r>2r>2 is essential.

For distinct vectors define D=max⁡i∣xir−yir∣D=\max_i|x_i^r-y_i^r|. Equation (2) implies

#{x≠y:D≤T}≤(N+CrT2/r)r−Nr.(3)\#\{\mathbf x\ne\mathbf y:D\le T\} \le (N+C_rT^{2/r})^r-N^r. \tag{3}

For any fixed distinct pair, hold all but a coefficient corresponding to a maximal difference fixed. The allowed interval in that coefficient has length at most 2/D2/D. Thus its slab in [1,2]r[1,2]^r has measure at most 2/D2/D.

Divide 1≤D≤Nr1\le D\le N^r into dyadic intervals and expand (3). The off-diagonal contribution to (1) is at most a constant depending on rr times

∑j=1rNr−j∑k=0⌈log⁡2Nr⌉2k(2j/r−1).(4)\sum_{j=1}^r N^{r-j} \sum_{k=0}^{\lceil\log_2 N^r\rceil}2^{k(2j/r-1)}. \tag{4}

The jjth term is Or(Nr−j)O_r(N^{r-j}) when 2j<r2j<r, Or(Nr/2log⁡(2N))O_r(N^{r/2}\log(2N)) when 2j=r2j=r, and Or(Nj)O_r(N^j) when 2j>r2j>r. All are Or(Nr)O_r(N^r). The diagonal contributes exactly NrN^r, proving (1).

Fatou's lemma gives

∫[1,2]rlim inf⁡N→∞Qa(N)Nr da<∞.\int_{[1,2]^r}\liminf_{N\to\infty}\frac{Q_{\mathbf a}(N)}{N^r}\,d\mathbf a<\infty.

Consequently, for almost every a\mathbf a, there are a finite constant CaC_{\mathbf a} and arbitrarily large NN with Qa(N)≤CaNrQ_{\mathbf a}(N)\le C_{\mathbf a}N^r. Equal rounded values have unrounded difference less than one. Cauchy--Schwarz therefore gives at least Nr/CaN^r/C_{\mathbf a} distinct rounded values from [1,N]r[1,N]^r. They are at most 2rNr2rN^r, proving positive upper density.

Why this does not produce integral coefficients

The exceptional set in the theorem may contain every rational vector. Approximating coefficients separately at finite scales gives no fixed rational vector that works along an unbounded sequence.

There is also a precise obstruction to replacing the continuous measure in the proof by a discrete distribution. Suppose a measure has an atom of mass p>0p>0 at a rational vector a\mathbf a. Choose a nonzero integer vector v\mathbf v with a⋅v=0\mathbf a\cdot\mathbf v=0. Then for every positive integer kk,

μ{b:∣b⋅(kv)∣≤1}≥p.\mu\{\mathbf b:|\mathbf b\cdot(k\mathbf v)|\le1\}\ge p.

Thus no uniform slab bound C/∥kv∥∞C/\|k\mathbf v\|_\infty is available. This excludes that termwise replacement, not every arithmetic averaging argument: requiring kvk\mathbf v to be an actual vector of power differences restores a difficult Diophantine condition.

More directly, if a countable weighted average over rational coefficient vectors satisfied

∑jpjEaj(N)≤CNr,pj>0,\sum_j p_j E_{\mathbf a_j}(N)\le C N^r, \qquad p_j>0,

along a common unbounded sequence, then positivity would already imply Eaj(N)≤(C/pj)NrE_{\mathbf a_j}(N)\le(C/p_j)N^r for every supported vector. Such an estimate contains the individual arithmetic energy theorem; the probabilistic extraction does not bypass it.

What an adaptive arithmetic average would need

There is a precise conditional extraction criterion for the weaker logarithmic moment. For a positive rational coefficient tuple a\mathbf a, let

La(N)=N−r∑vRa,N(v)log⁡Ra,N(v),L_{\mathbf a}(N)=N^{-r}\sum_v R_{\mathbf a,N}(v) \log R_{\mathbf a,N}(v),

where the sum is over its exact rational output values, not rounded ones. Suppose probability measures μN\mu_N on the countable set of rational tuples satisfy ∑aμN(a)La(N)≤C\sum_{\mathbf a}\mu_N(\mathbf a)L_{\mathbf a}(N)\le C. If one fixed finite set KK has μN(K)≥η>0\mu_N(K)\ge\eta>0 at arbitrarily large NN, then some fixed a∈K\mathbf a\in K has La(N)≤C/ηL_{\mathbf a}(N)\le C/\eta along an unbounded subsequence. Select such a tuple in KK at each scale and use finite pigeonhole. The logarithmic multiplicity criterion gives positive upper density after clearing its fixed denominators.

A uniformly bounded moment of a proper arithmetic height, whose bounded sublevel sets are finite, would guarantee this discrete tightness by Markov's inequality. Ordinary weak compactness in a real or pp-adic coefficient space does not guarantee it: measures can escape every finite arithmetic set. No adaptive average satisfying both the moment estimate and this tightness condition was constructed. This is a conditional criterion, not a new positive-density theorem.

A fixed sequence for which every rational tuple is exceptional

The following countermodel has been checked. It concerns a perturbation of powers, not actual powerful numbers. It shows that the difference estimate used in the metric proof, very accurate approximation to powers, and all eventual fixed congruences do not suffice for rational extraction.

Proposition. For every integer r≥3r\ge3 there is a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers f(n)f(n) with the following properties:

  1. f(n)=nr+O((log⁡n)1+o(1))f(n)=n^r+O((\log n)^{1+o(1)}).
  2. For each fixed mm, f(n)≡nr(modm)f(n)\equiv n^r\pmod m for all sufficiently large nn.
  3. Uniformly for N,T≥1N,T\ge1,
#{u,v≤N:0<∣f(u)−f(v)∣≤T}≪rT2/r.(5)\#\{u,v\le N:0<|f(u)-f(v)|\le T\}\ll_r T^{2/r}. \tag{5}
  1. For every fixed positive integral coefficient tuple a\mathbf a,
#{v≤X:v=∑i=1raif(xi) for some x1,…,xr∈N}=o(X),(6)\#\{v\le X:v=\textstyle\sum_{i=1}^r a_i f(x_i) \text{ for some }x_1,\ldots,x_r\in\mathbb N\}=o(X), \tag{6}

where the left side counts distinct values.

Nevertheless, the rounded values ⌊∑iaif(xi)⌋\lfloor\sum_i a_i f(x_i)\rfloor have positive upper density for almost every real a∈[1,2]r\mathbf a\in[1,2]^r.

Construction. For integers k≥0k\ge0, put

mk=max⁡{1,⌊log⁡log⁡(k+ee)⌋},Mk=lcm⁡(1,…,mk),qk=2⌊log⁡2(k+1)⌋Mk.m_k=\max\{1,\lfloor\log\log(k+e^e)\rfloor\},\quad M_k=\operatorname{lcm}(1,\ldots,m_k),\quad q_k=2^{\lfloor\log_2(k+1)\rfloor}M_k.

Both MkM_k and qkq_k divide their successors. Also Mk≤mk!M_k\le m_k! implies log⁡Mk=o(log⁡k)\log M_k=o(\log k), whence qk=k1+o(1)q_k=k^{1+o(1)}. On 2k≤n<2k+12^k\le n<2^{k+1}, define, apart from finitely many initial inputs,

f(n)=qk⌊nrqk⌋+(nr mod Mk),(7)f(n)=q_k\left\lfloor\frac{n^r}{q_k}\right\rfloor +(n^r\bmod M_k), \tag{7}

using the least nonnegative residue. Since Mk∣qkM_k\mid q_k,

0≤nr−f(n)<qk.(8)0\le n^r-f(n)<q_k. \tag{8}

This proves property 1 and the required congruence modulo MkM_k. Since mk→∞m_k\to\infty, property 2 follows.

For sufficiently large nn, even across block boundaries, the total possible change of the error in (8) is smaller than half of (n+1)r−nr(n+1)^r-n^r. Start (7) beyond such a point and set f(n)=nrf(n)=n^r at the finitely many earlier inputs. The transition also obeys this inequality after choosing the starting point sufficiently large. We obtain positive integers and

f(n+1)−f(n)≥12((n+1)r−nr)f(n+1)-f(n)\ge\tfrac12((n+1)^r-n^r)

for every nn. Hence for u>vu>v, f(u)−f(v)≥(ur−vr)/2f(u)-f(v)\ge(u^r-v^r)/2; the already proved power-difference estimate (2), with 2T2T in place of TT, proves (5).

Rational-coefficient value count. Fix a\mathbf a and an integer J≥1J\ge1, and write 2K≤N<2K+12^K\le N<2^{K+1}. If all xi>2K−Jx_i>2^{K-J}, their block indices lie between K−JK-J and KK. By nested divisibility, each f(xi)f(x_i) is a multiple of qK−Jq_{K-J} plus an integer in [0,MK)[0,M_K). Consequently ∑iaif(xi)\sum_i a_i f(x_i) occupies at most Oa(MK)O_{\mathbf a}(M_K) residue classes modulo qK−Jq_{K-J}. All these sums are Oa(Nr)O_{\mathbf a}(N^r), so they contribute at most

Oa(NrMKqK−J+MK)(9)O_{\mathbf a}\left(N^r\frac{M_K}{q_{K-J}}+M_K\right) \tag{9}

distinct values.

For fixed JJ, eventually mK−mK−J≤1m_K-m_{K-J}\le1. Therefore MK/MK−J≤mKM_K/M_{K-J}\le m_K, while 2⌊log⁡2(K−J+1)⌋≫K2^{\lfloor\log_2(K-J+1)\rfloor}\gg K. Thus MK/qK−J≪mK/K→0M_K/q_{K-J}\ll m_K/K\to0, and (9) is oa,J(Nr)o_{\mathbf a,J}(N^r). The tuples with some xi≤2K−Jx_i\le2^{K-J} number at most r2−JNrr2^{-J}N^r. Let N→∞N\to\infty and then J→∞J\to\infty to obtain

#{∑iaif(xi):1≤xi≤N}=o(Nr).\#\{\textstyle\sum_i a_i f(x_i):1\le x_i\le N\}=o(N^r).

Since f(n)≍nrf(n)\asymp n^r and the coefficients are positive, values up to XX have all xi=Oa(X1/r)x_i=O_{\mathbf a}(X^{1/r}). This proves (6). Clearing fixed denominators gives the analogous assertion for rational coefficients. Rounding rational outputs cannot increase their number, so every rational tuple is exceptional for the metric conclusion.

Finally (5) and f(n)≪nrf(n)\ll n^r are exactly the two sequence estimates used in the slab argument (3)--(4). Repeating that argument gives the same log-free averaged near-collision estimate, and Fatou and Cauchy--Schwarz give the last assertion. □\square

This countermodel does not preserve the exact polynomial identity f(n)=nrf(n)=n^r, nor does it claim all growing-modulus or major-arc estimates of the actual powers. It excludes extraction arguments based only on the properties explicitly listed above. No fixed rational coefficient tuple for the original problem was obtained.

Coordinate power rescaling does not remove height escape

For actual powers, positive upper density is invariant under replacing aia_i by aibira_i b_i^r with fixed bi∈Q>0b_i\in\mathbb Q_{>0}, interpreting rational value sets after clearing a fixed common denominator. For integral bib_i, writing VaV_{\mathbf a} for the positive value set and M=lcm⁡(b1,…,br)M=\operatorname{lcm}(b_1,\ldots,b_r) gives

V(aibir)⊆Va,MrVa⊆V(aibir).V_{(a_i b_i^r)}\subseteq V_{\mathbf a},\qquad M^r V_{\mathbf a}\subseteq V_{(a_i b_i^r)}.

The second inclusion uses the roots (M/bi)xi(M/b_i)x_i. General rational bib_i follow by a common denominator and fixed output dilation. This is a qualitative invariance for a fixed rescaling. If the rescaling grows with the counting parameter, the resulting density constants can tend to zero. No tight arithmetic coefficient average was constructed.