Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Energy, multiplicity, and the cubic quadric fibers


Status

The identities, local estimates, and real-volume estimates below are proved. They isolate sufficient targets for positive density, but no required global multiplicity or averaged lattice-point bound has been established. The bounded-ratio estimates and the obstructions to particular parametrizations do not resolve the density question.

The cross-coordinate correlation still needed

A direct attempt to keep the binary trace as well as its Eisenstein norm does not yet close the density argument. For F=x3+y3+cz3F=x^3+y^3+cz^3, c∈Nc\in\mathbb N fixed, define

CN(h)=#{(x,y,u,v)∈[1,N]4:x3+y3−u3−v3=h}.C_N(h)=\#\{(x,y,u,v)\in[1,N]^4: x^3+y^3-u^3-v^3=h\}.

The full box energy is exactly

EF(N)=NCN(0)+∑1≤z,w≤Nz≠wCN(c(w3−z3)).E_F(N)=N C_N(0)+ \sum_{\substack{1\le z,w\le N\\z\ne w}} C_N\bigl(c(w^3-z^3)\bigr).

The binary zero-difference term is controlled; the second term is not. Writing x3+y3=(x+y)(x2−xy+y2)x^3+y^3=(x+y)(x^2-xy+y^2) keeps the trace constraint but does not bound this shifted correlation. For norms of size N2N^2 with small common divisor, reduced norm ratios can have height of order N2N^2. Enumerating the binary quadruples and applying a divisor bound separately to w3−z3=hw^3-z^3=h loses the required average factor of order 1/N1/N. No estimate for the full sum, or a sufficient weaker rich-fiber bound, was obtained. This identity names the remaining count; it is not a replacement lemma that has been proved.

The zero-difference assertion has a precise form:

CN(0)=2N2−N+Oε(N4/3+ε).(A)C_N(0)=2N^2-N+O_\varepsilon(N^{4/3+\varepsilon}). \tag{A}

The main term counts the two permutations, with the diagonal corrected once. The remaining points lie off the rational lines of x3+y3−u3−v3=0x^3+y^3-u^3-v^3=0, so Heath-Brown, Theorem 1 applies. The nonsingularity, three coplanar rational lines, and precise definition of the count off those lines have been checked in the supplied paper. Thus the uncontrolled cross-coordinate sum would have to be Oc(N3)O_c(N^3) for this energy route to succeed.

There is also an exact entropy formulation. Let X,Y,ZX,Y,Z be independent uniform variables in {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\}, put U=X3+Y3U=X^3+Y^3 and T=U+cZ3T=U+cZ^3, and use natural logarithms. Conditional on TT, the input is uniform in its fiber, so the chain rule gives

1N3∑nRN(n)log⁡RN(n)=H(Z∣T)+H(X,Y∣U).(B)\frac1{N^3}\sum_n R_N(n)\log R_N(n) =H(Z\mid T)+H(X,Y\mid U). \tag{B}

Indeed UU is determined by (Z,T)(Z,T) and (X,Y)(X,Y) is independent of ZZ. The binary conditional entropy satisfies

H(X,Y∣U)=(1−1N)log⁡2+Oε(N−2/3+ε).(C)H(X,Y\mid U)=\left(1-\frac1N\right)\log2 +O_\varepsilon(N^{-2/3+\varepsilon}). \tag{C}

For an input pair let o=1o=1 if X=YX=Y and o=2o=2 otherwise, and let bN(U)b_N(U) be its full binary fiber size. Its excess logarithmic multiplicity is log⁡(bN(U)/o)≤bN(U)−o\log(b_N(U)/o)\le b_N(U)-o. Summed over inputs, the latter counts only nonpermutation binary collisions and is Oε(N4/3+ε)O_\varepsilon(N^{4/3+\varepsilon}) by (A). The average of log⁡o\log o is (1−1/N)log⁡2(1-1/N)\log2, proving (C).

Consequently, a bounded average logarithmic multiplicity here is equivalent to a bound for H(Z∣T)H(Z\mid T). Neither this conditional entropy nor a weaker bound retaining enough bounded-fiber input mass has been controlled. The trace--norm reformulation has not supplied the missing estimate.

A weaker target than the complete second moment

Inverting a cube difference is already almost unique

There is a precise limitation to replacing the inverse difference-of-cubes map by a divisor estimate, even when seeking only logarithmic multiplicity. Put

DN(h)=#{(z,w)∈[1,N]2:z≠w, w3−z3=h}.D_N(h)=\#\{(z,w)\in[1,N]^2:z\ne w,\ w^3-z^3=h\}.

The binary collision bound (A), with its two permutation families removed, gives

∑h≠0DN(h)(DN(h)−1)≪εN4/3+ε.(D1)\sum_{h\ne0}D_N(h)(D_N(h)-1) \ll_\varepsilon N^{4/3+\varepsilon}. \tag{D1}

Indeed, equality of two nonzero differences is a binary sum-of-cubes collision after rearrangement. One permutation family identifies the two ordered pairs; the other would give zero differences. Since log⁡t≤t−1\log t\le t-1 for t≥1t\ge1,

1N(N−1)∑h≠0DN(h)log⁡DN(h)≪εN−2/3+ε.(D2)\frac1{N(N-1)}\sum_{h\ne0}D_N(h)\log D_N(h) \ll_\varepsilon N^{-2/3+\varepsilon}. \tag{D2}

Thus inverse difference multiplicity has vanishing average logarithm.

The usual divisor majorant behaves very differently. For a uniform ordered pair z≠wz\ne w,

ω(∣w3−z3∣)log⁡log⁡N⟶2in probability.(D3)\frac{\omega(|w^3-z^3|)}{\log\log N}\longrightarrow2 \quad\hbox{in probability}. \tag{D3}

Here is a short proof. For primes p>3p>3, the density of zeros of w3−z3w^3-z^3 modulo pp is

βp={3/p−2/p2,p≡1(mod3),1/p,p≡2(mod3).\beta_p= \begin{cases} 3/p-2/p^2,&p\equiv1\pmod3,\\ 1/p,&p\equiv2\pmod3. \end{cases}

For d=pd=p or pqpq, CRT and residue-box counting give divisibility probability

∏p∣dβp+O(N−1+dN−2).(D4)\prod_{p\mid d}\beta_p+O(N^{-1}+dN^{-2}). \tag{D4}

The implicit constant is absolute for these one- and two-prime moduli. Take Z=N1/4Z=N^{1/4} and sum the indicators for p≤Zp\le Z. The errors in their first and second moments tend to zero: the pair error is O(Z2/N+Z4/N2)=o(1)O(Z^2/N+Z^4/N^2)=o(1). For example, Mertens' estimate and the fixed-conductor real-character bound applied to the nonprincipal character modulo three give ∑p≤Zβp=2log⁡log⁡N+O(1)\sum_{p\le Z}\beta_p=2\log\log N+O(1), while ∑pβp2<∞\sum_p\beta_p^2<\infty. Thus the mean and variance of this small-prime count are both 2log⁡log⁡N+O(1)2\log\log N+O(1). Removing the diagonal z=wz=w changes these moments by o(1)o(1), since its contributions are at most π(Z)/N\pi(Z)/N and π(Z)2/N\pi(Z)^2/N. There are at most twelve prime factors above ZZ of a nonzero difference of size at most N3N^3. Chebyshev's inequality proves (D3).

As τ(m)≥2ω(m)\tau(m)\ge2^{\omega(m)}, it follows that on 1−o(1)1-o(1) of all nonzero pairs,

log⁡τ(∣w3−z3∣)≥(2log⁡2−o(1))log⁡log⁡N.(D5)\log\tau(|w^3-z^3|) \ge (2\log2-o(1))\log\log N. \tag{D5}

The convergence persists under any restrictions retaining a fixed positive proportion of pairs. Hence the logarithmic divisor majorant still diverges on every such restriction, although the actual inverse entropy in (D2) tends to zero.

This is not an estimate for the needed cross-coordinate incidence. In particular, (D1) does not justify discarding its exceptional differences after they are weighted by the other coordinates. The uncontrolled all-nonzero contribution for a diagonal ternary cubic is

∑h1h2h3≠0a1h1+a2h2+a3h3=0DN(h1)DN(h2)DN(h3).\sum_{\substack{h_1h_2h_3\ne0\\ a_1h_1+a_2h_2+a_3h_3=0}} D_N(h_1)D_N(h_2)D_N(h_3).

Neither (D2) nor (D3) bounds that sum.

The bounded-fiber and entropy criteria

Fix positive integer coefficients a1,…,ara_1,\ldots,a_r, and write

F(x)=∑i=1raixir,RN(n)=#{x∈[1,N]r:F(x)=n},VN=F([1,N]r).F(\mathbf x)=\sum_{i=1}^r a_ix_i^r,\quad R_N(n)=\#\{\mathbf x\in[1,N]^r:F(\mathbf x)=n\},\quad V_N=F([1,N]^r).

If X\mathbf X is uniform on [1,N]r[1,N]^r, then

E1RN(F(X))=1Nr∑n∈VNRN(n)1RN(n)=∣VN∣Nr.(1)\mathbb E\frac1{R_N(F(\mathbf X))} =\frac1{N^r}\sum_{n\in V_N}R_N(n)\frac1{R_N(n)} =\frac{|V_N|}{N^r}. \tag{1}

Consequently the positive value set of FF has positive upper natural density if and only if there are constants K,c>0K,c>0 and arbitrarily large NN such that

#{x∈[1,N]r:RN(F(x))≤K}≥cNr.(2)\#\{\mathbf x\in[1,N]^r:R_N(F(\mathbf x))\le K\}\ge cN^r. \tag{2}

Indeed, (2) makes (1) at least c/Kc/K. Conversely, if (1) is at least δ\delta, choose K≥2/δK\ge2/\delta. The contribution from tuples over fibers larger than KK is at most 1/K1/K, so at least a δ/2\delta/2 fraction of tuples lie over fibers of size at most KK. To pass between box values and ordinary upper density, use F([1,N]r)⊆[1,(∑iai)Nr]F([1,N]^r)\subseteq[1,(\sum_i a_i)N^r], and the fact that every positive tuple representing a value at most XX has all coordinates at most (X/min⁡iai)1/r(X/\min_i a_i)^{1/r}.

A sufficient, potentially weaker substitute for the usual energy bound is

1Nr∑nRN(n)log⁡RN(n)≤C(3)\frac1{N^r}\sum_n R_N(n)\log R_N(n)\le C \tag{3}

along an unbounded sequence. Jensen applied to e−te^{-t} makes (1) at least e−Ce^{-C}. In contrast, the full bound ∑nRN(n)2≪Nr\sum_nR_N(n)^2\ll N^r controls ERN(F(X))\mathbb E R_N(F(\mathbf X)). Condition (3) is sufficient, not claimed necessary. No unconditional proof of (2) or (3) for a suitable diagonal form was obtained.

Good-prime energy factors have no divergent product for r≥3r\ge3

Consider the collision form

H(x,y)=∑i=1rai(xir−yir).H(\mathbf x,\mathbf y)=\sum_{i=1}^r a_i(x_i^r-y_i^r).

Let p∤r∏iaip\nmid r\prod_i a_i, and let NpN_p count its zeros in Fp2r\mathbb F_p^{2r}. For

Si(b)=∑x mod pep(baixr),S_i(b)=\sum_{x\bmod p}e_p(ba_ix^r),

additive orthogonality gives the exact identity

Np=p2r−1+1p∑b≠0∏i=1r∣Si(b)∣2.(4)N_p=p^{2r-1}+\frac1p\sum_{b\ne0}\prod_{i=1}^r|S_i(b)|^2. \tag{4}

The multiplicative-character expansion and ordinary Gauss-sum bound yield ∣Si(b)∣≤(r−1)p|S_i(b)|\le(r-1)\sqrt p for b≠0b\ne0. Therefore

0≤Np−p2r−1≤(r−1)2rpr.(5)0\le N_p-p^{2r-1}\le(r-1)^{2r}p^r. \tag{5}

Only the zero vector can be singular modulo pp. Every other root lifts nonsingularly. When all 2r2r coordinates are divisible by pp, scaling the variables contributes p−2rp^{-2r} and scaling the degree-rr output contributes prp^r. Thus the limiting zero density is

σp:=lim⁡k→∞p−k(2r−1)#{H=0(modpk)}=Np−1p2r−1(1−p−r).(6)\sigma_p:=\lim_{k\to\infty}p^{-k(2r-1)} \#\{H=0\pmod{p^k}\} =\frac{N_p-1}{p^{2r-1}(1-p^{-r})}. \tag{6}

One can derive (6) by decomposing vectors according to their common pp-adic valuation; the contribution of valuation jj is p−rj(Np−1)/p2r−1p^{-rj}(N_p-1)/p^{2r-1}, and the residual all-divisible part tends to zero.

Equations (5)–(6) imply

σp=1+Or(p1−r).(7)\sigma_p=1+O_r(p^{1-r}). \tag{7}

The good-prime product is therefore convergent and positive for every r≥3r\ge3. For cubes at p≡2(mod3)p\equiv2\pmod3, the cubing map is bijective, so Np=p5N_p=p^5 exactly. This local calculation removes a possible explanation for logarithmic loss; it does not prove a global energy bound or control multiplicities at individual integers.

Cubic collisions as quaternary quadratic equations

For r=3r=3, let hi=xi−yih_i=x_i-y_i and ui=xi+yiu_i=x_i+y_i. Apart from the diagonal h=0\mathbf h=0, write

h=tk,t=gcd⁡(h1,h2,h3)>0,\mathbf h=t\mathbf k,\qquad t=\gcd(h_1,h_2,h_3)>0,

where k\mathbf k is primitive and may have negative coordinates. The identity

4(xi3−yi3)=hi(3ui2+hi2)4(x_i^3-y_i^3)=h_i(3u_i^2+h_i^2)

converts a collision into

Qk(u,t):=3∑i=13aikiui2+t2∑i=13aiki3=0.(8)Q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf u,t) :=3\sum_{i=1}^3a_i k_i u_i^2 +t^2\sum_{i=1}^3a_i k_i^3=0. \tag{8}

There are also the parity conditions ui≡tki(mod2)u_i\equiv t k_i\pmod2, and positivity bounds inherited from xi,yix_i,y_i. With K=∥k∥∞K=\|\mathbf k\|_\infty, one has ui≪Nu_i\ll N and t≪N/Kt\ll N/K. When nonzero, the determinant squareclass of this quadric is

3a1a2a3k1k2k3(∑iaiki3).(9)3a_1a_2a_3 k_1k_2k_3\left(\sum_i a_i k_i^3\right). \tag{9}

The coefficients and the right side of the associated ternary equation are tied together; this is not a free coefficient average to which a uniform ternary bound can be applied without further work.

Coefficient choice cannot give this generic quadric a rational section

For arbitrary positive rational aia_i, the generic projective quadric over K=Q(h1,h2,h3)K=\mathbb Q(h_1,h_2,h_3) associated with (8) is

3∑iaihiui2+F(h)w2=0.(D)3\sum_i a_i h_i u_i^2+F(\mathbf h)w^2=0. \tag{D}

It has no KK-point. A rational-function point could be specialized at positive rational hih_i, avoiding its finitely many denominators and preserving a nonzero coordinate. Every coefficient in (D) would then be positive, a contradiction.

Its determinant squareclass is 3a1a2a3h1h2h3F(h)3a_1a_2a_3h_1h_2h_3F(\mathbf h), and remains nonsquare over Q‾(h)\overline{\mathbb Q}(\mathbf h). The smooth projective plane cubic F=0F=0 is geometrically irreducible, is distinct from each coordinate line, and occurs with valuation one in that determinant. Thus changing the nonzero coefficients cannot turn this generic quadric into a split quadric or remove the cubic factor of its discriminant.

Over K(−3)K(\sqrt{-3}) there is the explicit point ui=(−3/3)hiu_i=(\sqrt{-3}/3)h_i, w=1w=1. The quadric then becomes rational by projection from a point, but is not split: its determinant is still nonsquare. This recovers the setting of the Eisenstein parametrization, not a way around its integral-height problem. The assertion concerns a generic rational section; it does not exclude rational points in individual mixed-sign fibers, whose average remains uncontrolled.

Real volume is on the correct scale; lattice counts are not controlled

Fix 0<δ<10<\delta<1 and restrict all six original variables to [δN,N][\delta N,N]. This retains a fixed positive proportion of the possible positive triples. On the corresponding real region, ui≥2δNu_i\ge2\delta N. Choose jj with ∣kj∣=K|k_j|=K. Then

∣∂Qk∂uj∣=6aj∣kj∣uj≫δ,aKN.\left|\frac{\partial Q_{\mathbf k}}{\partial u_j}\right| =6a_j|k_j|u_j\gg_{\delta,\mathbf a}KN.

For fixed other coordinates there is at most one positive root in uju_j. Integrating the Dirac mass of QkQ_{\mathbf k} in that coordinate, then over the two remaining uu coordinates and over t≪N/Kt\ll N/K, gives

∫physical regionδ0(Qk(u,t)) du dt≪δ,aN2(N/K)KN=N2K2.(10)\int_{\text{physical region}}\delta_0(Q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf u,t))\,d\mathbf u\,dt \ll_{\delta,\mathbf a}\frac{N^2(N/K)}{KN} =\frac{N^2}{K^2}. \tag{10}

There are O(K3)O(K^3) primitive directions in a dyadic shell. Summing (10) for dyadic K≪NK\ll N gives O(N3)O(N^3), without a logarithm.

However, the corresponding pointwise bound for integer points is false. With equal coefficients and k1+k2+k3=0k_1+k_2+k_3=0, take cyclic permutation solutions y=(x2,x3,x1)\mathbf y=(x_2,x_3,x_1). For a fixed such direction and t≪N/Kt\ll N/K, the differences determine x\mathbf x up to a common translation. There are ≫N\gg N admissible translations and ≫N/K\gg N/K admissible tt, giving ≫N2/K\gg N^2/K points in that fiber when the ranges are nonempty. These permutation solutions contribute only O(N3)O(N^3) in total, but they cannot be bounded pointwise by the real volume.

Unresolved step: an averaged lattice-point estimate at the O(N3)O(N^3) scale, separating these accumulating families and controlling the remaining fibers uniformly. Equations (7) and (10) settle neither that estimate nor the weaker multiplicity criterion (2). They show exactly why neither a divergent good-prime product nor a real-volume logarithm supplies the missing argument.

Distinct cube classes still have split positive fibers

One attempted remedy was to use

F(x1,x2,x3)=x13+2x23+4x33.F(x_1,x_2,x_3)=x_1^3+2x_2^3+4x_3^3.

This form has no nonzero rational zero. Indeed, the valuations at 22 of its nonzero summands lie in distinct residue classes modulo three, so the minimum valuation occurs uniquely. Consequently C(k)=k13+2k23+4k33C(\mathbf k)=k_1^3+2k_2^3+4k_3^3 never vanishes at a nonzero rational direction. Distinct coefficient cube classes also remove ordinary coordinate-permutation identities.

They do not, however, remove all positive split fibers. There is the exact identity

F(27m+92s, 212m+480s, 171m+515s)=F(27m+12s, 212m+642s, 171m+391s).(11)\begin{aligned} F(27m+92s,\ 212m+480s,\ 171m+515s)\\ =F(27m+12s,\ 212m+642s,\ 171m+391s). \end{aligned} \tag{11}

All variables are positive for m,s>0m,s>0. For a direct verification, put

k=(40,−81,62),v=(27,212,171),w=(104,1122,906),\mathbf k=(40,-81,62),\quad \mathbf v=(27,212,171),\quad \mathbf w=(104,1122,906),

and qk(z)=40z12−162z22+248z32q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf z)=40z_1^2-162z_2^2+248z_3^2. Exact arithmetic gives

C(k)=−45570,qk(v)=0,∑iaikiviwi=0,qk(w)=60760.C(\mathbf k)=-45570,\quad q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf v)=0,\quad \sum_i a_i k_i v_iw_i=0,\quad q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf w)=60760.

Therefore Qk(u,t)=3qk(u)−45570t2Q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf u,t)=3q_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf u)-45570t^2 vanishes on the plane (u,t)=(2mv+sw,2s)(\mathbf u,t)=(2m\mathbf v+s\mathbf w,2s). Recovering x=(u+tk)/2\mathbf x=(\mathbf u+t\mathbf k)/2 and y=(u−tk)/2\mathbf y=(\mathbf u-t\mathbf k)/2 proves (11). The squareclass expression is in fact a square:

24k1k2k3C(k)=219698438400=4687202.24 k_1k_2k_3 C(\mathbf k)=219698438400=468720^2.

The identity and its three quadratic equalities were also checked by exact symbolic expansion. This is a counterexample to global nonsplitting for these coefficients, not evidence against an averaged O(N3)O(N^3) bound.

Fixed diagonal points give genus-two direction curves

The same coefficient choice yields a more precise description of the rational lines through a fixed diagonal point. Fix v∈Q3\mathbf v\in\mathbb Q^3 with v1v2v3≠0v_1v_2v_3\ne0 and set

bi=aivi3,ℓi=aivi2ki,(a1,a2,a3)=(1,2,4).b_i=a_iv_i^3,\qquad \ell_i=a_iv_i^2k_i, \qquad (a_1,a_2,a_3)=(1,2,4).

A nondegenerate fiber QkQ_{\mathbf k} contains (v,0)(\mathbf v,0) exactly when ∑iℓi=0\sum_i\ell_i=0. Given this rational point, it has rational ruling lines exactly when its determinant is square: split off one hyperbolic plane; the remaining binary form is hyperbolic precisely under this condition. Its determinant squareclass is

3ℓ1ℓ2ℓ3(ℓ13b12+ℓ23b22+ℓ33b32).3\ell_1\ell_2\ell_3 \left(\frac{\ell_1^3}{b_1^2}+ \frac{\ell_2^3}{b_2^2}+ \frac{\ell_3^3}{b_3^2}\right).

Putting (ℓ1,ℓ2,ℓ3)=(s,t,−s−t)(\ell_1,\ell_2,\ell_3)=(s,t,-s-t) identifies these rational directions with points on the double cover

W2=−3st(s+t)(s3b12+t3b22−(s+t)3b32).(12)W^2=-3st(s+t) \left(\frac{s^3}{b_1^2}+\frac{t^3}{b_2^2} -\frac{(s+t)^3}{b_3^2}\right). \tag{12}

The binary sextic has six distinct projective roots. None of the roots of st(s+t)st(s+t) is a root of the cubic factor, because a coincidence requires bi=±bjb_i=\pm b_j, contrary to the distinct rational cube classes of 1,2,41,2,4. The discriminant of the cubic factor is

−27(b1−b2−b3)(b1−b2+b3)(b1+b2−b3)(b1+b2+b3)(b1b2b3)4.(13)\frac{-27(b_1-b_2-b_3)(b_1-b_2+b_3) (b_1+b_2-b_3)(b_1+b_2+b_3)}{(b_1b_2b_3)^4}. \tag{13}

Each numerator factor is nonzero: otherwise some signed choice of the viv_i would give a nonzero rational zero of FF, which the valuation argument excludes. Formula (13) follows by expanding the usual binary-cubic discriminant.

Thus the smooth projective curve (12) has genus two. By Faltings's theorem it has finitely many rational points. For each fixed v\mathbf v with nonzero coordinates, there are therefore only finitely many nondegenerate rational ruling directions through the corresponding diagonal point. Each such direction gives two lines, neither contained in t=0t=0, whose intersection with the quadric there is a nonsingular conic.

Remaining gap. There is no uniform bound for these directions as v\mathbf v varies, nor a bound for nonsplit fibers. Fixed-point finiteness does not control the required growing-height average and supplies no bounded-multiplicity or positive-density conclusion.

Subsequent range estimates

The controlled-range note now bounds coordinate-zero differences, differences of size at most N2/3−ηN^{2/3-\eta}, and primitive directions of size at most N1/2−ηN^{1/2-\eta} by O(N3)O(N^3). It supplies the full coefficient-uniform quadratic argument. For (1,2,4)(1,2,4), the remaining energy problem is entirely in nonsingular fibers with larger primitive directions; in particular, the shell ∥k∥≍N\|\mathbf k\|\asymp N, t=1t=1 has not been controlled. This narrows the outstanding average without proving it.

The cube-free-output note proves that a positive proportion of inputs for (1,2,4)(1,2,4) have cube-free output, and that the average logarithm of the output's cube part is bounded. However, the explicit split identity (11) still supplies ≫N2\gg N^2 positive primitive collisions with cube-free output. A restricted energy or bounded-fiber theorem on that positive-mass input set remains unproved; deleting common dilations does not by itself remove the outstanding problem.

Exact prime-scaling for geometric coefficient tuples

This is a proved, author-recorded normalization, not a multiplicity bound. For any prime pp and integer r≥2r\ge2, set

Fp,r(x)=x1r+px2r+⋯+pr−1xrr,T(x)=(pxr,x1,…,xr−1).F_{p,r}(\mathbf x)=x_1^r+px_2^r+\cdots+p^{r-1}x_r^r, \qquad T(\mathbf x)=(px_r,x_1,\ldots,x_{r-1}).

Then Fp,r(Tx)=pFp,r(x)F_{p,r}(T\mathbf x)=pF_{p,r}(\mathbf x) and Tr=pIT^r=pI. Conversely, if p∣Fp,r(x)p\mid F_{p,r}(\mathbf x) for an integral tuple, reduction modulo pp forces p∣x1p\mid x_1. Hence

T−1(x)=(x2,…,xr,x1/p)T^{-1}(\mathbf x)=(x_2,\ldots,x_r,x_1/p)

is integral, positive when x\mathbf x is positive, and has value Fp,r(x)/pF_{p,r}(\mathbf x)/p. Thus, for the unrestricted positive representation function rp,r(n)r_{p,r}(n), the two maps give a bijection proving

rp,r(pn)=rp,r(n)(n≥1).(14)r_{p,r}(pn)=r_{p,r}(n)\qquad(n\ge1). \tag{14}

In particular rF(2n)=rF(n)r_F(2n)=r_F(n) for F=x3+2y3+4z3F=x^3+2y^3+4z^3. This identity is for all positive representations of a target, not a fixed-box representation function: the transformation changes the shape of a box.

Let V(X)V(X) count distinct positive values of Fp,rF_{p,r} up to XX, and V∗(X)V^*(X) count those values not divisible by pp. Equation (14) gives exactly

V(X)=∑j≥0V∗(X/pj).(15)V(X)=\sum_{j\ge0}V^*(X/p^j). \tag{15}

Consequently V(X)=o(X)V(X)=o(X) if and only if V∗(X)=o(X)V^*(X)=o(X). For the nontrivial implication, truncate (15) at j<Jj<J; the tail is at most Xp−J/(1−p−1)X p^{-J}/(1-p^{-1}). First let X→∞X\to\infty, then J→∞J\to\infty. Equivalently, positive upper density can be tested just on the pp-free targets. For the cubic candidate, this means odd targets. The identity does not supply control on how many representations those odd targets have.

A near-neighbor existence criterion

The following is a proved implication with an unproved hypothesis. It records a possible way to avoid bounding all collision pairs, not a solution of the density problem.

Fix 0<δ<10<\delta<1 and positive integer coefficients a1,a2,a3a_1,a_2,a_3. Put F(x)=∑iaixi3F(\mathbf x)=\sum_i a_ix_i^3 and BN=[δN,N]3∩Z3\mathcal B_N=[\delta N,N]^3\cap\mathbb Z^3. Write RNδ(n)R_N^\delta(n) for the number of representations of nn in BN\mathcal B_N. Let BN(ε)B_N(\varepsilon) count the points x∈BN\mathbf x\in\mathcal B_N for which there exists y∈BN∖{x}\mathbf y\in\mathcal B_N\setminus\{\mathbf x\} satisfying

F(y)=F(x),∥y−x∥2≤εN.F(\mathbf y)=F(\mathbf x),\qquad \|\mathbf y-\mathbf x\|_2\le\varepsilon N.

Each input is counted only once, regardless of how many neighbors it has. If

lim⁡ε↓0lim sup⁡N→∞BN(ε)N3=0,(16)\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0}\limsup_{N\to\infty} \frac{B_N(\varepsilon)}{N^3}=0, \tag{16}

then the positive value set of FF has positive lower density.

To prove this implication, each level surface in the box is a graph

x3=((n−a1x13−a2x23)/a3)1/3.x_3=\left((n-a_1x_1^3-a_2x_2^3)/a_3\right)^{1/3}.

For any two points of the graph lying in the box, the difference-of-cubes formula gives a Lipschitz bound for this projection inverse, with constant depending only on δ\delta and the coefficients. For example,

∣x3−y3∣≤a1∣x1−y1∣+a2∣x2−y2∣a3δ2.|x_3-y_3|\le\frac{a_1|x_1-y_1|+a_2|x_2-y_2|}{a_3\delta^2}.

Thus points that are mutually more than hh apart have projections separated by more than h/Lh/L, where LL is fixed. Packing in [δN,N]2[\delta N,N]^2 bounds their number by C(1+N/h)2C(1+N/h)^2.

Choose a constant AA sufficiently large, depending only on this packing constant. For all sufficiently large fixed KK, put h=AN/Kh=AN/\sqrt K. In a fiber of size R>KR>K, at most K/2K/2 points can have no other fiber point within distance hh: these isolated points are mutually hh-separated. At least R/2R/2 points therefore have a neighbor within hh. Summing over such fibers,

#{x∈BN:RNδ(F(x))>K}≤2BN(A/K).(17)\#\{\mathbf x\in\mathcal B_N:R_N^\delta(F(\mathbf x))>K\} \le2B_N(A/\sqrt K). \tag{17}

Under (16), choose a fixed KK making the limsup on the right less than half the asymptotic input mass (1−δ)3N3(1-\delta)^3N^3. Then ≫N3\gg N^3 inputs lie in fibers of size at most KK, yielding ≫N3\gg N^3 distinct values below (a1+a2+a3)N3(a_1+a_2+a_3)N^3, for every sufficiently large NN. This proves the claimed positive lower density.

For pairs with all three coordinate differences nonzero, the existing short-difference estimate bounds their number by Oa,η(N1+ηH3)O_{\mathbf a,\eta}(N^{1+\eta}H^3). The later coordinate-zero refinement proves that inputs with a coordinate-sharing near neighbor are Oa(εN3)+o(N3)O_{\mathbf a}(\varepsilon N^3)+o(N^3), so their contribution does vanish in the iterated limit in (16). For (1,2,4)(1,2,4) even unrestricted off-diagonal coordinate-sharing collisions have a power saving. The all-nonzero-difference estimate still does not establish (16): the needed scale is H=εNH=\varepsilon N with fixed ε\varepsilon, not H≪N2/3−ηH\ll N^{2/3-\eta}. No estimate for the near-neighbor existence count at that scale has been proved. Bounding all short collision pairs at the O(N3)O(N^3) scale would return to the stronger full pair-energy problem in the interior box: partition it into a fixed number L=Oε(1)L=O_\varepsilon(1) of smaller boxes of diameter at most εN\varepsilon N. Cauchy--Schwarz bounds the total energy by LL times the sum of their within-box energies, hence by LL times the short-pair energy. The possible advantage in (16) is precisely that it only counts existence.

What the available packing estimate actually yields

For F=x3+2y3+4z3F=x^3+2y^3+4z^3, combining (17) with the two checked short-difference and coordinate-sharing bounds gives, for every fixed η>0\eta>0 and all sufficiently large KK,

#{x∈BN:RNδ(F(x))>K}≪δ,ηN4+ηK−3/2+N1+3(1+log⁡N)4.(17a)\#\{\mathbf x\in\mathcal B_N:R_N^\delta(F(\mathbf x))>K\} \ll_{\delta,\eta} N^{4+\eta}K^{-3/2}+N^{1+\sqrt3}(1+\log N)^4. \tag{17a}

Indeed, in the all-nonzero-difference bound substitute H=AN/KH=AN/\sqrt K, increasing the fixed lower threshold for KK so H≤NH\le N. The coordinate-sharing contribution is bounded by the unrestricted off-diagonal count. If K>N2K>N^2 the left side is zero, so no smaller-distance convention is needed.

After division by N3N^3, the first term in (17a) still grows for fixed KK. It becomes useful only for polynomially growing KK. Thus this combination of pointwise quadratic counting and packing does not prove (16) or bounded average logarithmic multiplicity. This identifies the loss in the attempted estimate; it does not exclude a sharper bound for neighbor existence.

Separated prime-adic coefficients do not give coordinatewise injectivity

This checked obstruction comes from Section 9 of the independent record. It concerns a proposed congruence proof of injectivity, not the existence of integral collisions in a growing box.

Let p∤rp\nmid r and let two coefficients be pe0u0p^{e_0}u_0 and pe1u1p^{e_1}u_1, where u0,u1∈Zp×u_0,u_1\in\mathbb Z_p^\times and e1>e0e_1>e_0. Set all yi=1y_i=1, and all but these two xix_i equal to 11. The collision equation becomes

x0r=1−pe1−e0(u1/u0)(x1r−1).x_0^r=1-p^{e_1-e_0}(u_1/u_0)(x_1^r-1).

For every x1∈Zpx_1\in\mathbb Z_p, the right side is 1(modp)1\pmod p. Hensel's lemma supplies a unique x0∈1+pZpx_0\in1+p\mathbb Z_p. Factoring x0r−1x_0^r-1 shows that, when x1r−1x_1^r-1 is a unit,

vp(x0−1)=e1−e0.v_p(x_0-1)=e_1-e_0.

For example, take x1=px_1=p. A change in the higher-weight coordinate can therefore be canceled by a sufficiently deep change in the lower-weight coordinate, however large the fixed exponent spacing. It is invalid to infer coordinatewise equality by recursively reducing such collision equations modulo pp.

These solutions are pp-adic; they are not asserted to be positive integral solutions or to lie in any prescribed box. The argument does not refute a global energy estimate. It also does not conflict with the exact prime-scaling identity (14), whose reduction modulo pp concerns divisibility of one represented value rather than subtraction of two representations.

The prime-geometric digit argument leaves a critical carry map

The following exact formulation records why a subsequent digit/entropy attempt did not establish positive density. Put F=x3+2y3+4z3F=x^3+2y^3+4z^3 and N=2kN=2^k, k≥1k\ge1. For each odd a∈[1,N)a\in[1,N) and each (y,z)∈[1,N]2(y,z)\in[1,N]^2, there is exactly one odd x∈[1,N]x\in[1,N] with

F(x,y,z)≡a(modN).F(x,y,z)\equiv a\pmod N.

Indeed a−2y3−4z3a-2y^3-4z^3 is odd and cubing permutes the odd residues modulo 2k2^k. Define

Ca,k(y,z)=F(x,y,z)−aN.C_{a,k}(y,z)=\frac{F(x,y,z)-a}{N}.

This maps exactly N2N^2 input pairs into the integers in [0,7N2][0,7N^2]. Its fiber at cc has size exactly RN(a+Nc)R_N(a+Nc), the original cubic box-representation count. Low-digit uniformity has therefore only separated the odd-output problem into critical maps with N2N^2 inputs and O(N2)O(N^2) possible carries.

If sa,k(c)s_{a,k}(c) denotes that fiber size, a bound

∑1≤a<Na odd∑csa,k(c)log⁡sa,k(c)≪N3\sum_{\substack{1\le a<N\\a\text{ odd}}}\sum_c s_{a,k}(c)\log s_{a,k}(c)\ll N^3

would imply positive upper density by the logarithmic criterion above, applied to the N3/2N^3/2 odd-output inputs. In entropy language, with natural logarithms and uniform (y,z)(y,z), the exact identity is

H(Ca,k)=2log⁡N−1N2∑csa,k(c)log⁡sa,k(c).H(C_{a,k})=2\log N- \frac1{N^2}\sum_c s_{a,k}(c)\log s_{a,k}(c).

The missing estimate is a bounded average entropy deficit for the carries. Neither Hensel lifting nor rF(2n)=rF(n)r_F(2n)=r_F(n) controls it. Successive digit steps retain growing polynomial carries rather than a proved finite-state recursion. No bounded-fiber or logarithmic-moment estimate was obtained.

The subsequent carry-spectrum calculation gives the exact dyadic lift and proves that primitive high-conductor carry characters need not decay: an odd-modulus resonance survives at every dyadic scale. Thus contracting all such modes is not a valid way to close the entropy estimate.

The primitive-fiber note proves that common dilations cost only bounded entropy, removes low-height projected planes from the logarithmic moment, and excludes rational lines and conics on individual output surfaces for (1,2,4)(1,2,4). None of these statements controls the remaining primitive high multiplicity.

Nearest-neighbor secants need not decrease height

There is an exact normalization for this approach. For a collision F(x)=F(x+tk)=nF(x)=F(x+t k)=n, with primitive integral kk, put C=F(k)C=F(k), B=∑iaixiki2B=\sum_i a_i x_i k_i^2, and A=∑iaixi2kiA=\sum_i a_i x_i^2k_i. Assume C≠0C\ne0, as always holds for the special form. Expansion gives 3A+3tB+t2C=03A+3tB+t^2C=0, and the third secant point is

[C(x−tk)−3Bk:C].[C(x-tk)-3Bk:C].

Its integer content is exactly g=gcd⁡(C,3B)g=\gcd(C,3B): reducing the first three coordinates modulo CC gives −3Bki-3Bk_i, and kk is primitive. Thus g∣3Ag\mid3A as well. The polynomial identity

nk1k2k3=A∑ixikjkℓ−B∑ixjxℓki+Cx1x2x3,n k_1k_2k_3 =A\sum_i x_i k_jk_\ell -B\sum_i x_jx_\ell k_i+C x_1x_2x_3,

where {i,j,ℓ}={1,2,3}\{i,j,\ell\}=\{1,2,3\} in each summand, gives g∣3nk1k2k3g\mid3n k_1k_2k_3. One can verify the identity by applying the cubic equation with roots xi/kix_i/k_i to each root and summing with weights aiki3a_i k_i^3; clearing denominators makes it valid also when some ki=0k_i=0. These divisibilities alone supply no useful height decrease.

The following checked family defeats a proposed universal descent, not the near-neighbor existence criterion. Take positive integers uj,vju_j,v_j defined by

2vj+uj34=(6+34)(35+634)j.2v_j+u_j\sqrt{34}=(6+\sqrt{34})(35+6\sqrt{34})^j.

They satisfy 2vj2−17uj2=12v_j^2-17u_j^2=1, tend to infinity, and vj/uj→17/2v_j/u_j\to\sqrt{17/2}. For j≥1j\ge1, set

Pj=(uj−1,vj+1,2uj−1),Qj=(uj+1,vj−1,2uj+1).P_j=(u_j-1,v_j+1,2u_j-1),\qquad Q_j=(u_j+1,v_j-1,2u_j+1).

These positive points lie in a fixed interior cone and satisfy

F(Pj)=F(Qj),Qj−Pj=(2,−2,2),F=x3+2y3+4z3.F(P_j)=F(Q_j),\qquad Q_j-P_j=(2,-2,2), \quad F=x^3+2y^3+4z^3.

For example, with U=(u,v,2u)U=(u,v,2u) and k=(1,−1,1)k=(1,-1,1), F(U+k)−F(U−k)=6(17u2−2v2)+6=0F(U+k)-F(U-k)=6(17u^2-2v^2)+6=0.

Their third secant point on F=nF=n, where n=F(Pj)n=F(P_j), is integral:

Tj=(−8uj−2vj, 9uj+3vj, −7uj−2vj).T_j=(-8u_j-2v_j,\ 9u_j+3v_j,\ -7u_j-2v_j).

Direct substitution in the cubic on the line gives this formula. In projective coordinates its last coordinate is one, so its primitive height is 9uj+3vj9u_j+3v_j. With Nj=vj+1N_j=v_j+1, the maximum endpoint coordinate,

H(Tj)/Nj⟶3+92/17>6.(18)H(T_j)/N_j\longrightarrow3+9\sqrt{2/17}>6. \tag{18}

Moreover Pj,QjP_j,Q_j are eventually reciprocal unique nearest integer neighbors on their level surface. To check this, fix h=(a,b,c)∈Z3h=(a,b,c)\in\mathbb Z^3. After replacing vj2v_j^2 by (17uj2+1)/2(17u_j^2+1)/2, the difference F(Pj+h)−F(Pj)F(P_j+h)-F(P_j) has uj2,uj,vju_j^2,u_j,v_j coefficients

3(a+17b+16c),3(a2−2a+8c2−16c),6b(b+2),3(a+17b+16c),\quad 3(a^2-2a+8c^2-16c),\quad 6b(b+2),

respectively, and a constant term. If it vanished for infinitely many jj, division first by uj2u_j^2 and then by uju_j would force these three coefficients to be zero, since 17/2\sqrt{17/2} is irrational. Thus b=0b=0 or −2-2. For b=0b=0 one gets a=−16ca=-16c and c(33c+2)=0c(33c+2)=0, hence h=0h=0. For b=−2b=-2, one gets a=34−16ca=34-16c and 33c2−134c+136=033c^2-134c+136=0, whose only integral root is c=2c=2; hence h=(2,−2,2)h=(2,-2,2). Both differences also annihilate the constant term.

Every other bounded integer difference therefore occurs only finitely often. A finite union proves that, for every fixed radius, eventually there are no other equal-output points in that neighborhood of either endpoint. In particular nearest-neighbor selection does not repair the height increase in (18). This is a sparse fixed-direction family already covered by the controlled-range estimates; it does not obstruct a statistical descent that discards a negligible set of inputs.

A binary norm majorant cannot be bounded on positive input mass

This is a limitation of one factorization argument for an equal-coefficient binary subsum. It is not a bound for actual cubic multiplicity, and does not exclude a factorization method that retains the trace condition.

Put

Q(x,y)=x2−xy+y2,ω1(m)=#{p∣m:p≡1(mod3)}.Q(x,y)=x^2-xy+y^2, \qquad \omega_1(m)=\#\{p\mid m:p\equiv1\pmod3\}.

For a uniform pair (x,y)∈[1,N]2∩Z2(x,y)\in[1,N]^2\cap\mathbb Z^2,

ω1(Q(x,y))log⁡log⁡N⟶1in probability.(19)\frac{\omega_1(Q(x,y))}{\log\log N}\longrightarrow1 \quad\text{in probability}. \tag{19}

Here is the second-moment proof. Set Z=N1/4Z=N^{1/4} and sum the indicators 1p∣Q(x,y)1_{p\mid Q(x,y)} over p≤Zp\le Z, p≡1(mod3)p\equiv1\pmod3, obtaining TT. Over Fp\mathbb F_p, Q=0Q=0 is the union of two distinct lines, so its root count is 2p−12p-1 and its normalized density is βp=2/p−1/p2\beta_p=2/p-1/p^2. For d=pd=p or pqpq with distinct such primes, CRT gives a root count ϱ(d)≤4d\varrho(d)\le4d, and residue-box counting gives

Pr⁡(d∣Q)=ϱ(d)d2+O(1/N+d/N2).(20)\Pr(d\mid Q)=\frac{\varrho(d)}{d^2} +O(1/N+d/N^2). \tag{20}

The summed single-prime errors are O(Z/N+Z2/N2)O(Z/N+Z^2/N^2); the summed two-prime errors are O(Z2/N+Z4/N2)=o(1)O(Z^2/N+Z^4/N^2)=o(1). The products of single-prime errors also have total o(1)o(1), even after multiplication by ∑βp=O(log⁡log⁡N)\sum\beta_p=O(\log\log N). The classical Mertens theorem in arithmetic progressions therefore yields

ET=log⁡log⁡N+O(1),Var⁡T=log⁡log⁡N+O(1).\mathbb ET=\log\log N+O(1),\qquad \operatorname{Var}T=\log\log N+O(1).

Chebyshev's inequality proves concentration. Since Q(x,y)≤N2Q(x,y)\le N^2, at most eight prime divisors exceed ZZ. This proves (19).

Unique factorization in the Eisenstein integers gives, for every positive integer mm represented by QQ,

rQ(m):=#{(u,v)∈Z2:Q(u,v)=m}=6∏p≡1 (3)(vp(m)+1)≥6 2ω1(m).(21)r_Q(m):=\#\{(u,v)\in\mathbb Z^2:Q(u,v)=m\} =6\prod_{p\equiv1\ (3)}(v_p(m)+1) \ge6\,2^{\omega_1(m)}. \tag{21}

Indeed the six units give the factor six. A split prime of exponent ee can be distributed between its two conjugate prime factors in e+1e+1 ways; an inert prime must have even exponent and contributes one choice, and the ramified prime contributes one choice. Equations (19)--(21) show that, on 1−o(1)1-o(1) of the input pairs,

log⁡rQ(Q(x,y))≥(log⁡2−o(1))log⁡log⁡N.(22)\log r_Q(Q(x,y))\ge(\log2-o(1))\log\log N. \tag{22}

Every restriction retaining a fixed positive proportion of pairs therefore still has divergent average logarithmic norm multiplicity. The same holds for positive-mass subsets of triples (x,y,z)(x,y,z), since the exceptional pair set times [1,N][1,N] has size o(N3)o(N^3). In particular, a bounded norm-divisor sieve cannot retain positive input mass.

For the actual cubic x3+y3+cz3=nx^3+y^3+cz^3=n, write s=x+ys=x+y and d=x−yd=x-y. The exact factorization requires

4(n−cz3)=s3+3sd2,s∣n−cz3,4(n−cz3)/s−s23=d2,(23)4(n-cz^3)=s^3+3sd^2, \qquad s\mid n-cz^3,\quad \frac{4(n-cz^3)/s-s^2}{3}=d^2, \tag{23}

with the parity and positivity restrictions on s,ds,d. For fixed trace ss and norm Q(x,y)Q(x,y) there are at most two pairs (x,y)(x,y). It is this compatibility, not the full Eisenstein norm count, that eliminates the spurious multiplicity in (22). No estimate sufficient for positive density was obtained while retaining (23).

A square-class reformulation retains the unknown collision mass

Fix positive integers a1,a2,a3a_1,a_2,a_3, 0<η<10<\eta<1, and N≥2N\ge2. Let H=[ηN,N]∩Z\mathcal H=[\eta N,N]\cap\mathbb Z, and define

bN(D)=#{(x1,y1,x2,y2)∈[1,N]4∩Z4:4∑i=12ai(xi3−yi3)=D},b_N(D)=\#\left\{(x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2)\in[1,N]^4\cap\mathbb Z^4: 4\sum_{i=1}^2a_i(x_i^3-y_i^3)=D\right\}, AN(n)=∑h∈HbN(−a3h(h2+n)),1≤n≤12N2.A_N(n)=\sum_{h\in\mathcal H} b_N\bigl(-a_3h(h^2+n)\bigr),\qquad 1\le n\le12N^2.

For a cubic collision with h=x3−y3∈Hh=x_3-y_3\in\mathcal H and u=x3+y3u=x_3+y_3, the identity

4a3(x33−y33)=a3h(h2+3u2)4a_3(x_3^3-y_3^3)=a_3h(h^2+3u^2)

shows that its count is at most

TN=∑1≤u≤2NAN(3u2).(24)T_N=\sum_{1\le u\le2N}A_N(3u^2). \tag{24}

The omitted parity and endpoint conditions only enlarge this count; given h,uh,u, the two third coordinates are uniquely determined.

Two elementary estimates explain the appeal of this reformulation. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0,

∑nAN(n)≪a,εN4+ε,∑nAN(n)2≪a,εN1+ε∫01∣fN(α)∣8 dα,(25)\sum_n A_N(n)\ll_{\mathbf a,\varepsilon}N^{4+\varepsilon}, \qquad \sum_n A_N(n)^2 \ll_{\mathbf a,\varepsilon}N^{1+\varepsilon} \int_0^1|f_N(\alpha)|^8\,d\alpha, \tag{25}

where fN(α)=∑x=1Ne(αx3)f_N(\alpha)=\sum_{x=1}^N e(\alpha x^3). Every occurring D=−a3h(h2+n)D=-a_3h(h^2+n) is nonzero and has ∣D∣≪aN3|D|\ll_{\mathbf a}N^3 when bN(D)≠0b_N(D)\ne0. Its possible hh are divisors of ∣D∣|D|, hence number Oa,ε(Nε)O_{\mathbf a,\varepsilon}(N^\varepsilon); D,hD,h determine nn. Since ∑DbN(D)=N4\sum_D b_N(D)=N^4, this proves the first estimate. Cauchy--Schwarz in hh proves

∑nAN(n)2≪N1+ε∑DbN(D)2.\sum_n A_N(n)^2\ll N^{1+\varepsilon}\sum_D b_N(D)^2.

Finally, orthogonality and Cauchy--Schwarz give

∑DbN(D)2=∫01∣fN(4a1α)∣4∣fN(4a2α)∣4 dα≤∫01∣fN(α)∣8 dα.\sum_D b_N(D)^2 =\int_0^1|f_N(4a_1\alpha)|^4|f_N(4a_2\alpha)|^4\,d\alpha \le\int_0^1|f_N(\alpha)|^8\,d\alpha.

In particular, inserting an eighth-moment bound ∫∣fN∣8≪εN5+ε\int|f_N|^8\ll_\varepsilon N^{5+\varepsilon} yields, after renaming ε\varepsilon, ∑nAN(n)2≪a,εN6+ε\sum_n A_N(n)^2\ll_{\mathbf a,\varepsilon}N^{6+\varepsilon}. No improvement of that moment is being asserted here.

The square sieve would have to detect that 3n3n is a square. Writing n=dv2n=dv^2, with dd squarefree, gives the masses

BN(d)=∑v≥1: dv2≤12N2AN(dv2),BN(3)=TN.(26)B_N(d)=\sum_{v\ge1:\,dv^2\le12N^2}A_N(dv^2), \qquad B_N(3)=T_N. \tag{26}

For sieve primes greater than 4N4N, all these vv are coprime to the primes. Thus quadratic-character grouping is exact, and the d=3d=3 contribution has character value 11. A quadratic large-sieve bound using the grouped coefficient norm encounters ∑dBN(d)2≥TN2\sum_d B_N(d)^2\ge T_N^2. It cannot be estimated from ∑nAN(n)2\sum_n A_N(n)^2 by pretending that all the nn are squarefree. For smaller sieve primes one must also keep the coprimality factors; discarding them does not justify that replacement.

Even the bounds ∑AN≪N4\sum A_N\ll N^4 and ∑AN2≪N6\sum A_N^2\ll N^6 alone would not control (24) by O(N3)O(N^3). On 1≤n≤N21\le n\le N^2, the abstract nonnegative weights

a(n)=N2+N5/21{n=3v2 for some v≥1}a(n)=N^2+N^{5/2}\mathbf1_{\{n=3v^2\text{ for some }v\ge1\}}

extended by zero up to 12N212N^2, have these two bounds, but their 33-square-class mass is ≍N7/2\asymp N^{7/2}. These weights are not claimed to arise from cubic differences. They show exactly why the two moment bounds and the proposed ungrouped large-sieve step do not prove the desired collision estimate. A bound exploiting the actual square-class concentration or a new joint character correlation remains unproved.