Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Many representations with large ratios in all three traces


Scope

For every fixed K≥2K\ge2, there are arbitrarily large NN and KK distinct positive representations

xj3+yj3+zj3=N3,(xj,yj,zj)∈[N/3,N]3,x_j^3+y_j^3+z_j^3=N^3,\qquad (x_j,y_j,z_j)\in[N/3,N]^3,

such that, for each of the three chosen traces x+y,x+z,y+zx+y,x+z,y+z, every reduced ratio between two representations has height ≍KN\asymp_K N. Constants may depend on the fixed construction.

This rules out forcing a small ratio in at least one of the three traces merely from a large fixed number of interior representations. No primitivity assertion is made. The constructed family is sparse and has cube targets; it does not rule out a typical-fiber estimate after deleting negligible input families.

A conic on the equal-sums surface

In the plane x+y=3(w−z)x+y=3(w-z), put d=x−yd=x-y. The equation x3+y3+z3=w3x^3+y^3+z^3=w^3 contains the residual conic

(23z−29w)2+23(3d)2=312w2.(1)(23z-29w)^2+23(3d)^2=312w^2. \tag{1}

Indeed, substituting x=(3(w−z)+d)/2x=(3(w-z)+d)/2 and y=(3(w−z)−d)/2y=(3(w-z)-d)/2 reduces the cubic equation to

(w−z)(23w2−58wz+23z2+9d2)=0.(w-z)\bigl(23w^2-58wz+23z^2+9d^2\bigr)=0.

The quadratic factor is equivalent to (1).

Let ρ=−23\rho=\sqrt{-23} and α0=−105−3ρ\alpha_0=-105-3\rho, whose norm is 11232=312⋅6211232=312\cdot6^2. Choose LL with 2L−1≥K2^{L-1}\ge K, and choose KK distinct sign vectors ϵ∈{±1}L\epsilon\in\{\pm1\}^L whose last coordinate is +1+1. Fix even integers c1,…,cLc_1,\ldots,c_L, to be selected below, and take positive even integers MM. Define

G(M)=∏i=1L((M+ci)2+23),w=6G(M),G(M)=\prod_{i=1}^L((M+c_i)^2+23),\qquad w=6G(M), tϵ+eϵρ=α0∏i=1L(M+ci+ϵiρ)2,t_\epsilon+e_\epsilon\rho =\alpha_0\prod_{i=1}^L(M+c_i+\epsilon_i\rho)^2,

and

zϵ=tϵ+29w23,dϵ=eϵ/3,xϵ=3(w−zϵ)+dϵ2,yϵ=3(w−zϵ)−dϵ2.z_\epsilon=\frac{t_\epsilon+29w}{23},\qquad d_\epsilon=e_\epsilon/3,\qquad x_\epsilon=\frac{3(w-z_\epsilon)+d_\epsilon}{2},\qquad y_\epsilon=\frac{3(w-z_\epsilon)-d_\epsilon}{2}.

These coordinates are integral. The coefficient eϵe_\epsilon is divisible by three. Modulo 2323, one has tϵ≡−105Gt_\epsilon\equiv-105G and 29w=174G29w=174G, so the formula for zϵz_\epsilon is integral. Since M+ciM+c_i is even, tϵ,eϵ,zϵ,dϵt_\epsilon,e_\epsilon,z_\epsilon,d_\epsilon are odd and ww is even, which verifies the divisions by two. Taking norms gives (1), hence

xϵ3+yϵ3+zϵ3=w3.x_\epsilon^3+y_\epsilon^3+z_\epsilon^3=w^3.

As M→∞M\to\infty with the cic_i fixed,

(xϵ,yϵ,zϵ)/w⟶(2/3,5/6,1/2).(x_\epsilon,y_\epsilon,z_\epsilon)/w \longrightarrow(2/3,5/6,1/2).

Thus all the points eventually lie in the claimed interior box.

Choosing constants so that the trace gcds are bounded

Before specializing Xi=M+ciX_i=M+c_i, put

Uϵ=∏i(Xi+ϵiρ),Vϵ=∏i(Xi−ϵiρ).U_\epsilon=\prod_i(X_i+\epsilon_i\rho),\qquad V_\epsilon=\prod_i(X_i-\epsilon_i\rho).

Each of the three trace formulas is a binary quadratic expression

AUϵ2+BUϵVϵ+CVϵ2,AC≠0.A U_\epsilon^2+B U_\epsilon V_\epsilon+C V_\epsilon^2, \qquad A C\ne0.

This follows directly from its nonzero real-linear dependence on tϵ,eϵt_\epsilon,e_\epsilon, together with w=6UϵVϵw=6U_\epsilon V_\epsilon. Over an algebraic closure it therefore factors into expressions Uϵ−λVϵU_\epsilon-\lambda V_\epsilon, with λ≠0\lambda\ne0.

On the open set Xi≠±ρX_i\ne\pm\rho, use the coordinates ui=(Xi+ρ)/(Xi−ρ)u_i=(X_i+\rho)/(X_i-\rho). Each such factor becomes, up to a unit, a Laurent binomial

∏iuiϵi−λ.\prod_i u_i^{\epsilon_i}-\lambda.

It is irreducible because the exponent vector is primitive. Binomials from two selected sign vectors are not associates: their exponent vectors are neither equal nor opposite. Also no trace polynomial has a factor Xi−ρX_i-\rho or Xi+ρX_i+\rho, because AC≠0A C\ne0. Consequently two trace polynomials for the same chosen trace and different sign vectors are coprime.

Their common-zero locus in affine LL-space therefore has codimension at least two. A generic line parallel to (1,…,1)(1,\ldots,1) misses it: the exceptional translations lie in the image of this locus times an affine line, of dimension at most L−1L-1. There are only finitely many pairs and traces. Thus fixed even integral cic_i can be chosen outside all exceptional algebraic sets. For that choice the corresponding one-variable trace polynomials in MM are pairwise coprime.

After clearing their fixed denominators, Bezout identities for these polynomials show that the gcds of their integer values are bounded independently of MM. Each trace has size ≍w\asymp w, so all the reduced trace-ratio heights are ≍w\asymp w. In particular the represented triples are distinct for all sufficiently large MM. Set N=wN=w to finish the proof.

What remains possible

The fixed-ratio collision bound does not acquire a deterministic rich-fiber consequence by simply using all three traces. This construction shows why. But it produces only OK(T1/(2L))O_K(T^{1/(2L)}) inputs of root height at most TT, since w≍M2Lw\asymp M^{2L}. It is therefore a zero-mass input family. It neither establishes unbounded typical multiplicity nor prevents a statistical estimate which first excludes sparse exceptional families.