Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Birational similitudes and direct product constructions
Status and scope
The classification and counting results below are proved and independently checked. They strengthen the rational-transformation limitations, but settle neither a density question nor a new infinitude case. In particular, excluding composition laws is not a bound for integer fibers.
Birational similitudes in degree at least four
The external input is de Fernex's Birationally rigid hypersurfaces, Theorem A, page 1: every smooth complex degree- hypersurface in , for , is birationally superrigid. The theorem and its stated consequences were checked in version 6 of the full paper. A birational map from such a hypersurface to another smooth Fano hypersurface of Picard rank one is therefore an isomorphism.
Theorem. Let be finitely generated over , let , and put with . If and
then
for a permutation and . Positivity is not required.
Proof. Over , the map and its birational inverse induce a birational map between
Both are geometrically smooth: their partial derivatives vanish simultaneously only at the zero vector. Their dimension is , their geometric Picard rank is one, and adjunction gives .
Embed the finitely generated field into and apply de Fernex's theorem. The map becomes an isomorphism. This descends to : the two projections from the closure of its graph become isomorphisms after a faithfully flat field extension, hence are already isomorphisms. Since the isomorphism preserves the anticanonical bundle and
it is induced by a projective linear map over .
Let . There is such that , where here includes . The Hessian determinant of either polynomial is a nonzero scalar times . The Hessian transformation formula therefore makes monomial. Write its rows as , indexing by .
Comparison of coefficients and then -adic valuations gives
If moved , the shifts on the right would include . They cannot all be congruent modulo . Thus . The coefficient now gives , and the remaining coefficients give
A rational function in algebraic over belongs to . Consequently . Dehomogenizing and identifying with proves (1).
No composition law birational in one input
For there is no rational identity
whose generic -translation is birational. Apply the theorem over , with . Equation (1) would make a constant multiple of an th power in . The valuation at the absolutely irreducible polynomial is one, which is impossible for an th power. Absolute irreducibility follows from smoothness of its projective hypersurface: distinct positive-degree homogeneous factors would intersect and cause a singularity.
Thus for a fixed positive rational and , even arbitrarily complicated birational self-maps preserving are only its finite monomial symmetry group. Positivity of the image selects the positive coordinate scalings. The fixed-complexity qualification in the earlier rational-map bound is unnecessary for this subclass. The result does not exclude nonbirational rational maps, correspondences, or positive density of the value set.
Birational exponent descent is also excluded
Suppose a birational coordinate change identified with a positive diagonal degree- form in the same variables, where . Their generic projective levels would be birational: one is the degree- hypersurface above, the other is the smooth degree- hypersurface in . Over , both are smooth Fano varieties of Picard rank one. Superrigidity forces an isomorphism, but their Fano indices are and , respectively. This is impossible.
This does not exclude nonbirational power substitutions, such as when ; those substitutions retain uncontrolled power restrictions on the new coordinates.
Direct products of proper subsums
Let be the positive integers expressible as a sum of at most positive -powerful integers. For , canonical tuple counting gives
Suppose , all , and . Expansion of a product shows
because a product of powerful integers is powerful. But this construction has the bound
To prove this, put each factor in a dyadic range . Set and . The tuple count in that box is . Only can occur. There are compositions with sum ; geometric summation proves the first bound in (4). Finally , since another factor has at least two summands. This proves the second bound.
Thus ordinary multiplicative tensoring of proper subsums cannot give positive density, even when every powerful coefficient is allowed. No assertion about more general composition laws follows from (4).