Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
A lower bound for rainbow seven-cycles at every edge density above the Turán threshold
This is Theorem 1.2 of Plasma AI's write-up The seven-cycle case of the
maximal anti-Ramsey conjecture, held as
c7_threshold.pdf
with its TeX source in the research evidence. It is
restated and proved here from the notes of this folder. The result is the
paper's, credited to Plasma AI. It has not been independently reviewed here and
is not formalized: for the Lean development covers only the threshold
theorem. It carries no tier.
Statement
Theorem. For put and
Then, as ,
with the error term uniform in .
At this is the threshold value , and at it is , every edge of needing its own color. For odd cycles of length at least nine, Bucić, Chen and Ma's Theorem 1.2 gives the exact coefficient on the same range. Writing , that coefficient exceeds by , which is positive for . The bound here is therefore weaker in the interior, and it does not determine the coefficient for there; the five-clique construction shows that the longer-cycle coefficient is wrong for at every interior density. At the lower coefficient is , the construction's upper coefficient is , and the longer-cycle coefficient is .
Proof
Three results of this folder are used:
- the finite inequality (1) of the solution note, proved in palette savings: for vertex weights summing to one with weighted edge density , the fractional cost of covering the active edge types by independent sets of the two-plus-three conflict graph satisfies ;
- the cleaning lemma of Section 2 of the solution note, proved in seven-walk cleaning: for every and all large , a graph whose seven-cycles are all rainbow loses at most edges to a spanning subgraph in which no closed seven-walk contains two distinct edges of the same color;
- the threshold theorem of the solution note, .
Choose slowly enough that the cleaning lemma applies with for all large . Let have vertices, edges and an -coloring under which every is rainbow. Let be its cleaned subgraph, and put , so that .
Case . Give every vertex weight , so every edge of has demand and the weighted edge density is . By the cleaning lemma, each color class of , restricted to active edge types, is independent in , since a conflict between two of its edges would close into a seven-walk with a repeated color. Giving each nonempty class weight covers every demand, so . The finite inequality gives
using and for .
Case . Then . Delete edges of until exactly remain; every remaining is still rainbow and at most colors are used. The threshold theorem gives
since is increasing and .
In both cases the error depends only on , which proves the theorem uniformly in .
Standing
The argument adds two cases to results recorded in this folder. Its only external premise is the Szemerédi regularity lemma, used through the cleaning lemma. The threshold theorem it uses is the branch of claim L17, formalized in Lean, but this note's argument is not. No independent review of this note or of the paper's proof has been commissioned or filed. The question whether the bound or the construction gives the true coefficient is the first of the open questions.