Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Finite and coefficient-bounded separation lifts


These proved upper bounds complement the necessary lower bounds from root coverage. They do not settle the unbounded-coloring obligation for the prime tensors.

Coefficient-sensitive threshold

For an integer h≥1h\geq1, put Σh(C)={∑b∈Cnbb:nb∈Z, ∣nb∣≤h}\Sigma_h(C)=\{\sum_{b\in C}n_bb: n_b\in\mathbb Z,\ |n_b|\leq h\}. Define τq,h(B)\tau_{q,h}(B) by the same proper qq-colorings as τq\tau_q, but requiring zero intersections of their colorwise Σh\Sigma_h sets. Properness still means ordinary full dissociation, not hh-degree independence. Thus τq,1=τq\tau_{q,1}=\tau_q.

If t=τq,2h(B)<∞t=\tau_{q,2h}(B)<\infty, then for every integer s≥1s\geq1,

p≥t⌈t+s−1s⌉⟹τq,h(B⊗Sp)≤t+s.(1)p\geq t\left\lceil\frac{t+s-1}{s}\right\rceil \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \tau_{q,h}(B\otimes S_p)\leq t+s. \tag{1}

In particular p≥2tp\geq2t gives the bound 2t−12t-1, by taking s=t−1s=t-1, and p≥t2p\geq t^2 gives the bound t+1t+1. For a nonempty base a finite threshold has t≥2t\geq2, so these are valid simplex sizes.

Proof

Fix tt base witness colorings. Use t+st+s rows, which will be colorings of the new tensor, and distinguish row zero. Partition the other rows into groups of size at most ss. For every group GG and every witness type ii, make one layer: assign type ii to row zero and all rows in GG, and assign the other rows so every other witness type occurs. There are at least t−1t-1 such rows, so this is possible. Fill any extra layers by repetition.

Every row encounters all witness types, making its colorwise layer intersections zero and hence giving a proper tensor coloring. Every layer also contains every type among its rows.

Fix a color and a vector yy in all rowwise Σh\Sigma_h sets. Choose its layer sums ua,ju_{a,j} in row aa. Comparing its representation with row zero shows ua,j−u0,j=zau_{a,j}-u_{0,j}=z_a, independent of jj. On the layers associated with the group containing aa, both rows have the same base class of type ii. Thus za∈Σ2h(Ci)z_a\in\Sigma_{2h}(C_i) for every type ii, and za=0z_a=0. Now every layer has a common sum belonging to all types' Σh\Sigma_h, so that sum is zero and y=0y=0. This proves (1).

The coefficient doubling is a real hypothesis of this proof: ordinary τq(B)\tau_q(B) does not provide the needed intersections of difference sets. No fixed-degree extraction statement fills this gap.

A coarse saturation bound for a fixed base

There is also an ordinary-threshold bound without a higher-coefficient assumption, though it is extremely large. Let t=τq(B)<∞t=\tau_q(B)<\infty, d=∣Σ(B)−Σ(B)∣d=|\Sigma(B)-\Sigma(B)|, and r=d(t−1)+1r=d(t-1)+1. Let MM be the number of surjections [r]→[t][r]\to[t]. Then

m≥M⟹τq(B⊗Sm)≤r.(2)m\geq M\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \tau_q(B\otimes S_m)\leq r. \tag{2}

Construct rr colorings using as layers all surjections into a fixed tt-witness family; repeat layers for larger mm. Every row contains all witness types and is therefore proper.

For a vector common to a fixed color's signed spans, compare all layer representations to a reference row. Their differences are row shifts zaz_a, each in the finite set Σ(B)−Σ(B)\Sigma(B)-\Sigma(B). At least tt shifts coincide. If some row has a different shift, choose a surjection layer assigning all tt types to the equal-shift rows. Their common layer value is forced to zero. Assign to the exceptional row a type whose signed span excludes the nonzero shift difference; one exists by the witness property. This is a contradiction. Hence all shifts are equal; surjectivity of each layer then makes every layer sum zero. This proves (2).

Thus for any fixed base with finite τq\tau_q, sending a single new side size to infinity does not make its subsequent threshold unbounded. The bound depends strongly on the base; it does not rule out growth along changing bases.