Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
A dimension-uniform weak Gaussian bound for stable lattices
The theorem
A rank- Euclidean lattice is stable if and every nonzero sublattice has determinant at least one. Set
Theorem. There are an absolute and a function , independent of rank, such that every stable lattice satisfies
Consequently, for ,
This is an exponential-in-dimension bound, not a dimension-free bound such as at fixed . It is nevertheless sufficient for critical moment extraction.
1. The checked convex-body input
The regular -ellipsoid theorem, at parameter , supplies an absolute : every symmetric convex body has a centered ellipsoid with
Here is the least number of translates of covering . The exact statement was checked in Vritsiou, Theorem 1, equations (2)--(3) (arXiv:2303.17753v2). It explicitly restates Pisier's 1989 theorem; this is not a new verification of Pisier's original proof.
For measurable , write and . Define
These constants are dimension-independent, , and is positive and decreases to zero.
2. Every volume-one symmetric body has a good position
Claim. If and , then for each there is with
Proof. Let be the volume-one ball, and put . Applying (3) at and comparing volumes gives
Write with positive definite. The map has determinant one and sends to . Put , . Since , one has . Invariance and scaling of covering numbers give
For every symmetric convex body , its translates have Gaussian measure at most . An elementary justification is as follows. For each centered ball , put . Symmetry and convexity give ; Brunn--Minkowski implies . Integrate the resulting intersection-volume inequality over Gaussian level balls. A cover in (6) therefore yields
The radius . For example, is strictly larger than the volume of a radius- ball times , which gives this bound after taking volume radii. If has density , then . Markov's inequality gives
Equations (6)--(8), together with for , prove (5). In particular, no equal-volume assumption on the regular ellipsoid has been inserted.
3. A fixed-parameter induction on stable Voronoi cells
Let be the centered Voronoi cell of . We prove
The needed lattice facts are checked in Regev--Stephens-Davidowitz (arXiv:1611.05979v6): stable lattices form a compact set and a boundary lattice splits into proper stable sublattice and orthogonal quotient (Proposition 2.5); the Gaussian Voronoi functional has the position gradient of Theorem 3.1; Gaussian-isotropic bodies maximize Gaussian mass over determinant-one positions (Proposition 4.3). These apply at every positive parameter.
Fix . Induct on rank, choosing a stable minimizing , which exists by compactness and continuity. In rank one, up to isometry and its volume-one interval has no other determinant-one position; (5) applies directly.
If the minimizer is also a local minimum among determinant-one lattices, apply the gradient identity to . Its derivative matrix is
Vanishing in all trace-zero directions makes this a scalar matrix. Thus is Gaussian-isotropic at parameter , and
As , (5) proves (9) in this case. The lattice minimum has supplied stationarity, and body stationarity supplies a maximum over positions; there is no reversal of the desired inequality.
Otherwise lies on the stable boundary. There is a primitive sublattice of rank such that and , the orthogonal quotient, are stable. Their orthogonal product Voronoi body is a fundamental body for . The nearest-point map from that body to preserves volume and decreases norm almost everywhere, so
This is precisely the source's Claim 2.6 and Corollary 2.9, also displayed as equation (17). Induction at the same gives a lower bound . This proves (9).
Finally , by the source's Lemma 4.1. It also follows directly by integrating translated Gaussian densities on the symmetric Voronoi cell and pairing with . Equation (9) proves (1).
4. Duality and review
The dual of a stable lattice is stable. One can check this by saturating a sublattice of , taking its perpendicular sublattice in , and using the complementary determinant identity at . Poisson summation now gives
which is (2).
The primary passages, the volume normalization, covering rescaling, Gaussian translation and tail inequalities, and the full fixed-parameter induction are author-recorded; a separate reviewer checked each, and another checked the moment application. These are internal reviews, not external verification of an E0774 solution. No computation or constant-parameter Gaussian extremality conjecture enters the proof.