Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

The arithmetic depth of the moment cancellation target


The weak stable-lattice bridge establishes the required fixed-scale cancellation without this reduction. The modular-depth bounds remain valid; no explicit coding estimate at the sufficient depth is proved. The target language below describes the reduction's role as an exact alternative formulation.

The integer-graph reduction leaves the fixed-scale cancellation probability Pr⁡(CZ=0)\Pr(CZ=0) unestimated. This page gives an exact growing-modulus reformulation and a lower bound on the modulus scale that could certify extraction. It does not prove the required exponential cancellation.

1. Notation and the cancellation target

Let

n=2d,r=∑i=0k(di),m=n−r,CB,T=(−1)k−∣B∣+11B⊆T(∣T∣−∣B∣−1k−∣B∣),n=2^d,\quad r=\sum_{i=0}^k\binom di,\quad m=n-r, \qquad C_{B,T}=(-1)^{k-|B|+1}1_{B\subseteq T} \binom{|T|-|B|-1}{k-|B|},

where 0≤k<d0\leq k<d and ∣B∣≤k<∣T∣|B|\leq k<|T|. Write

θ(s)=∑j∈Ze−πs2j2,Pr⁡(Zi=j)=θ(s)−1e−πs2j2,\theta(s)=\sum_{j\in\mathbb Z}e^{-\pi s^2j^2},\qquad \Pr(Z_i=j)=\theta(s)^{-1}e^{-\pi s^2j^2},

with independent coordinates and fixed s>0s>0. Set p(s)=Pr⁡(CZ=0)p(s)=\Pr(CZ=0) and pq(s)=Pr⁡(CZ≡0(modq))p_q(s)=\Pr(CZ\equiv0\pmod q). The hard-kernel theta mass equals θ(s)mp(s)\theta(s)^m p(s). At r=o(n)r=o(n), the sufficient extraction target is, for fixed s,b>0s,b>0,

log⁡s+mnlog⁡θ(s)+1nlog⁡p(s)≤−b+o(1).(1)\log s+\frac mn\log\theta(s)+\frac1n\log p(s)\leq-b+o(1). \tag{1}

2. Every congruence has substantial mass

For any integer r×mr\times m matrix and any q≥2q\geq2,

pq(s)≥q−r.(2)\boxed{p_q(s)\geq q^{-r}.} \tag{2}

Indeed the single-coordinate characteristic function is positive everywhere. Fourier expansion of the periodized Gaussian gives

ϕs(t)=Ee2πitZi=1sθ(s)∑ℓ∈Ze−π(ℓ−t)2/s2>0.\phi_s(t)=\mathbb E e^{2\pi itZ_i} =\frac1{s\theta(s)} \sum_{\ell\in\mathbb Z}e^{-\pi(\ell-t)^2/s^2}>0.

This formula follows directly from the Gaussian Fourier transform by periodization. Orthogonality of characters of (Z/q)r(\mathbb Z/q)^r now gives

pq(s)=q−r∑u∈(Z/q)r∏i=1mϕs((CTu)i/q).p_q(s)=q^{-r}\sum_{u\in(\mathbb Z/q)^r} \prod_{i=1}^m\phi_s((C^{\mathsf T}u)_i/q).

All summands are nonnegative, and u=0u=0 contributes q−rq^{-r}. No rank or surjectivity assumption on C mod qC\bmod q is used.

Suppose one tries to establish (1) by the relaxation p≤pqp\leq p_q. Equations (1)--(2) then require

rlog⁡qn≥b+log⁡s+mnlog⁡θ(s)+o(1).(3)\frac{r\log q}{n}\geq b+\log s+\frac mn\log\theta(s)+o(1). \tag{3}

At r=o(n)r=o(n), the limiting right side is positive: the same periodization identity gives sθ(s)=θ(1/s)>1s\theta(s)=\theta(1/s)>1. Consequently bounded qq cannot supply such an estimate.

The precise boundary scale

For even dd and k=⌊d/2−12dlog⁡d⌋k=\lfloor d/2-\tfrac12\sqrt{d\log d}\rfloor,

rn∼12πdlog⁡d.(4)\frac rn\sim\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi d\log d}}. \tag{4}

Here is an elementary check, including the tail rather than just its largest term. Put u=d/2−k=12dlog⁡d+O(1)u=d/2-k=\tfrac12\sqrt{d\log d}+O(1). Stirling's formula and the central-binomial ratio product give

2−d(dk)∼2/π d−1.2^{-d}\binom dk\sim\sqrt{2/\pi}\,d^{-1}.

Put λ=4u/d\lambda=4u/d. For each fixed R>0R>0, uniformly for 0≤j≤R/λ0\leq j\leq R/\lambda, the logarithm of (dk−j)/(dk)\binom d{k-j}/\binom dk is −λj+o(1)-\lambda j+o(1): the additional summed error is O(j/d+j2/d+ju2/d2)=o(1)O(j/d+j^2/d+ju^2/d^2)=o(1) in this range. Thus these terms sum to (1−e−R+o(1))/λ(1-e^{-R}+o(1))/\lambda. Conversely every successive ratio is at most k/(d−k+1)k/(d-k+1), so the whole sum is at most (d−k+1)/(d−2k+1)∼1/λ(d-k+1)/(d-2k+1)\sim1/\lambda. Letting RR increase proves r/(dk)∼d/(4u)r/\binom dk\sim d/(4u), and hence (4).

It follows from (3) that any congruence-relaxation certificate at this boundary needs

log⁡q=Ωs,b(dlog⁡d).(5)\boxed{\log q=\Omega_{s,b}(\sqrt{d\log d}).} \tag{5}

For powers q=2Jq=2^J, the binary depth must be J=Ωs,b(dlog⁡d)J=\Omega_{s,b}(\sqrt{d\log d}). Fixed depth and moduli polynomial in dd are insufficient. Several scalar moduli combine to their least common multiple, to which the same bound applies. This assertion concerns congruences of the same full matrix CC, not arbitrary extra equations or conditioning.

3. Depth O(d)O(d) already captures exact equality

For the actual matrix above let

M2=max⁡B∑TCB,T2.M_2=\max_B\sum_T C_{B,T}^2.

Since j=∣T∣−∣B∣≥1j=|T|-|B|\geq1 whenever the entry is nonzero, we have (j−1k−∣B∣)≤2j−1\binom{j-1}{k-|B|}\leq2^{j-1}. Therefore

M2≤max⁡B∑j≥1(d−∣B∣j)4j−1≤5d−14.(6)M_2\leq\max_B\sum_{j\geq1}\binom{d-|B|}{j}4^{j-1} \leq\frac{5^d-1}{4}. \tag{6}

The moment-generating function has the elementary bound

EetZi≤et2/(4πs2).(7)\mathbb E e^{tZ_i}\leq e^{t^2/(4\pi s^2)}. \tag{7}

To check it, complete the square; the remaining shifted Gaussian sum is at most its value at zero. The latter maximality follows by periodization, whose Fourier coefficients are nonnegative. Independence, Chernoff's bound applied to either sign of each row, and a union bound give

Pr⁡(∥CZ∥∞≥q)≤2rexp⁡(−πs2q2/M2).(8)\Pr(\|CZ\|_\infty\geq q) \leq 2r\exp(-\pi s^2 q^2/M_2). \tag{8}

Choose a fixed A>0A>0 with πs2A>log⁡θ(s)\pi s^2A>\log\theta(s), and choose q=2Jq=2^J to be the smallest power of two at least max⁡{2,AnM2}\max\{2,\sqrt{AnM_2}\}. A nonzero vector congruent to zero modulo qq has some coordinate of absolute value at least qq. Thus

0≤pq(s)−p(s)≤2re−πs2An.0\leq p_q(s)-p(s)\leq2r e^{-\pi s^2 A n}.

But p(s)≥Pr⁡(Z=0)=θ(s)−mp(s)\geq\Pr(Z=0)=\theta(s)^{-m}. Since m,r≤nm,r\leq n,

pq(s)=p(s)(1+Os(e−csn))(9)\boxed{p_q(s)=p(s)(1+O_s(e^{-c_s n}))} \tag{9}

for some cs>0c_s>0, after fixing AA with a positive margin. Equation (6) gives

J≤12log⁡2(10) d+Os(1).(10)\boxed{J\leq\tfrac12\log_2(10)\,d+O_s(1).} \tag{10}

Thus replacing exact equality by this one growing binary modulus does not change the normalized logarithmic target, and in fact changes the probability by exponentially small relative error.

4. What this advances, and what remains

The exact cancellation problem can be studied as a multilevel binary coding problem. A bounded number of 22-adic levels is quantitatively insufficient for the intended estimate; O(d)O(d) levels suffice to retain the entire exact problem. No upper estimate for pqp_q at that depth has been proved here. In particular, neither a shallow-code calculation nor lattice covolume is being promoted to extraction.

The arguments are analytic, finite-dimensional, and computationally independent. No new experiment or imported paper theorem is used.

The inequalities, normalization, boundary asymptotic, and relative-error conclusion are author-recorded; a separate reviewer checked them independently. These are internal checks, not external review.