Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Uniform extraction bounds long-shift prescribed coloring


This closes a varying-relation-length possibility outside the earlier high-fractional full-shift regime. The conclusion concerns the prescribed supports. It is not a coloring of every additional ternary relation in a realization.

1. Statement

Let k≥2k\geq2, and label the pairs 1≤i<j≤n1\leq i<j\leq n by distinct nonzero rational vectors aija_{ij}. Suppose that, for every increasing

b1<b2<⋯<bk+1,b_1<b_2<\cdots<b_{k+1},

the kk consecutive pair labels support a relation whose every coefficient is +1+1 or −1-1. The signs may vary with the path. If the whole vector family has hereditary full-dissociation extraction constant at least δ>0\delta>0, then

n≤k+2(k−1)log⁡2(2(k−1))δ.(1)\boxed{n\leq k+ \frac{2(k-1)\log_2(2(k-1))}{\delta}.} \tag{1}

Its prescribed long-shift hypergraph H(n,2,k)H(n,2,k) consequently satisfies

χ(H(n,2,k))≤2+⌈log⁡2(1+2/δ)⌉.(2)\boxed{\chi(H(n,2,k))\leq 2+\left\lceil\log_2(1+2/\delta)\right\rceil.} \tag{2}

For each fixed δ\delta, this prescribed chromatic number is at most two for all sufficiently large kk.

2. The signed-cube argument

There is nothing to prove in (1) if n≤kn\leq k. Otherwise fix the last kk indices b2=n−k+1<⋯<bk+1=nb_2=n-k+1<\cdots<b_{k+1}=n. Every one of the m=n−km=n-k distinct labels

F={ai,b2:i<b2}F=\{a_{i,b_2}:i<b_2\}

is a signed sum of the d=k−1d=k-1 fixed suffix labels. Normalize the coefficient of the first label in its path relation to +1+1.

Choose a dissociated B⊆FB\subseteq F of size t≥δmt\geq\delta m, and fix one signed-cube representation of each of its members. Its 2t2^t subset sums are distinct. In any one of the dd representation coordinates, the subset-sum coefficients occupy an integer interval of length tt, hence at most t+1t+1 values. Thus

2t≤(t+1)d.(3)2^t\leq(t+1)^d. \tag{3}

For d=1d=1, (3) gives t≤1t\leq1. For d≥2d\geq2, it implies t≤2dlog⁡2(2d)t\leq2d\log_2(2d): otherwise x=t/d>2log⁡2(2d)≥4x=t/d>2\log_2(2d)\geq4 would give

x≤log⁡2(dx+1)≤log⁡2(2d)+log⁡2x≤log⁡2(2d)+x/2<x,x\leq\log_2(dx+1)\leq\log_2(2d)+\log_2x \leq\log_2(2d)+x/2<x,

a contradiction. Combining with t≥δmt\geq\delta m proves (1). Only full dissociation of BB, not a fixed-order substitute, was used.

3. Exact coloring of the prescribed hypergraph

For n≥2n\geq2,

χ(H(n,2,k))=⌈log⁡kn⌉.(4)\chi(H(n,2,k))=\lceil\log_k n\rceil. \tag{4}

For the upper bound, encode the nn indices by distinct increasing lexicographic words in [k]r[k]^r, and color the pair (i,j)(i,j) by its first differing coordinate. Along a monochromatic increasing path that coordinate strictly increases at every edge, so there are fewer than kk edges.

Conversely, an rr-coloring without a monochromatic kk-edge path assigns to every index the vector of the longest monochromatic path lengths ending there. Each coordinate is in {0,…,k−1}\{0,\ldots,k-1\}. For i<ji<j, the color of (i,j)(i,j) has a strictly larger coordinate at jj, so the nn vectors are distinct. Hence n≤krn\leq k^r.

Since log⁡2(2(k−1))≤k−1\log_2(2(k-1))\leq k-1, (1) gives n≤(1+2/δ)k2n\leq(1+2/\delta)k^2, and (2) follows from (4). The sharper n=Oδ(klog⁡k)n=O_\delta(k\log k) gives n≤k2n\leq k^2 eventually.

The abstract long-shift supports themselves have a uniform hereditary independence fraction of at least 1/41/4: independently label each underlying index source or sink, and retain pairs directed from a source to a sink. These contain no two consecutive edges, and every pair is retained with probability 1/41/4. The new obstruction is precisely that this abstract fact does not transfer to full dissociation of vector labels satisfying all the path relations.

4. An elementary binary-rank constraint on realizations

Call (i,j)(i,j) active if it occurs in some increasing kk-edge path; equivalently j−i≤n−kj-i\leq n-k. For n≥2k+1n\geq2k+1, the binary matrix of path supports, restricted to active columns, has zero nullspace if kk is odd, and the constant vectors as its one-dimensional nullspace if kk is even.

Proof. Let xij∈F2x_{ij}\in\mathbb F_2 sum to zero along every path. For j≤n−k+1j\leq n-k+1, fix a suffix of k−1k-1 edges after jj and vary the first vertex. This shows xij=yjx_{ij}=y_j, independent of i<ji<j. Precede any kk-subset of {2,…,n−k+1}\{2,\ldots,n-k+1\} by vertex (1). Its yy-sum is zero. This ground set has at least k+1k+1 elements; comparing subsets gives yj=cy_j=c for all jj, with kc=0kc=0.

The symmetric last-vertex argument gives one constant c′c' on all edges with i≥ki\geq k, also with kc′=0kc'=0. Edge (k,k+1)(k,k+1) belongs to both regions, so c=c′c=c'. Any remaining active edge has i<ki<k and j>n−k+1j>n-k+1. In a path containing it, all other edges are in the previous two regions. Its equation gives xij+(k−1)c=0x_{ij}+(k-1)c=0, whence xij=cx_{ij}=c. This proves the assertion. □\square

Every signing of the path rows reduces to this same binary matrix. Its rational rank is at least its binary rank. Thus odd kk in this range permits no nonzero rational realization at all on active edges. For even kk, a nonzero realization has all active labels collinear. Its primitive integer coefficient vector reduces to a nonzero binary constant vector, so all its entries are odd. This is not by itself a full dissociated coloring theorem.

Checks and finite evidence

The extraction argument, constants, prescribed coloring, and binary proof are author-recorded; a separate reviewer derived them independently. A single finite GF(2) rank diagnostic preceded the general proof. Its exact range, outputs, and checker are retained in the binary rank probe. No numerical result is needed for the proofs.