Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Valuation colorings and the limits of difference-tower flattening


The difference-tower theorem proves near-lossless proportional dissociation. This page proves exact limitations on proposed chromatic consequences. They do not color the line-seed towers or the original ordinary line covers.

1. Hereditary rank transfer on an ancestral subfamily

Fix a field K. At a difference stage D_N(B), retain only descendants of a specified subset S of the parent types. Suppose every subset T of S has K-rank at least delta|T|. The global seam/maximal-vertex proof applies without change to these selected types, giving rank density at least (1-1/N)delta for their descendants. The sheet group may still have a coordinate for every parent type, including types outside S: those extra coordinates cause no problem for the common height or the incoming-type argument.

It follows inductively that any ancestral seed subfamily of hereditary K-rank density delta has normalized descendant rank density at least

δPk,Pk=∏j=1k(1−1/Nj).(1)\delta P_k,\qquad P_k=\prod_{j=1}^k(1-1/N_j). \tag{1}

This statement can also be applied after dividing every seed column in that subfamily, and all its descendants, by a common nonzero integer and then reducing modulo a prime.

2. A valuation-layer coloring theorem

Fix a prime p and a finite nonzero integer seed A=(a_v). For each type let

tv=min⁡xνp(av(x)),Vt={v:tv=t},aˉv=p−tvav(modp).t_v=\min_x\nu_p(a_v(x)),\qquad V_t=\{v:t_v=t\},\qquad \bar a_v=p^{-t_v}a_v\pmod p.

The valuation of zero coordinates is infinity; since each column is nonzero, t_v is finite and every normalized residue column is nonzero. Assume, for one delta>0, that

rank⁡Fp{aˉv:v∈S}≥δ∣S∣(S⊆Vt, every t).(2)\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb F_p}\{\bar a_v:v\in S\} \geq\delta|S| \quad(S\subseteq V_t,\ \text{every }t). \tag{2}

Theorem. Every k-stage difference tower on A has

χ1(A(k))≤⌈1δPk⌉.(3)\boxed{\chi_1(A^{(k)})\leq \left\lceil\frac1{\delta P_k}\right\rceil.} \tag{3}

Proof. Every descendant of a type v has the same minimum p-valuation t_v: taking differences places positive and negative copies in distinct row blocks and never adds their entries. Normalize and reduce each ancestral layer modulo p. Section 1 gives hereditary rank density at least delta P_k in that layer. Edmonds' matroid partition theorem partitions its columns into K=ceil(1/(delta P_k)) residue-independent classes. Use the same K color names independently in each layer.

If a nonzero monochromatic ternary integer relation existed, choose its least occupied valuation t. Divide the entire relation by p^t and reduce modulo p. All higher layers vanish. The surviving coefficients in layer t are +1 or -1, which are nonzero also when p=2. This is a nontrivial linear relation among the residue-independent columns of one color, a contradiction. This proves (3). QED.

The source statement was checked in Edmonds, Section 1.3, Theorem 1, including its applicability to matrices over arbitrary fields.

3. Arbitrarily dense rational seeds whose towers remain two-colorable

Take the scalar seed

An=(1,p,p2,…,pn−1).(4)A_n=(1,p,p^2,\ldots,p^{n-1}). \tag{4}

It is fully dissociated: its largest occupied power exceeds the sum of all smaller powers, for p>=2. It has rational coloring number n, since every two nonzero scalars are rationally dependent. Nevertheless each valuation layer consists of a singleton, so (2) holds with delta=1. Thus

Pk≥12⟹χ1(An(k))≤2.(5)P_k\geq\tfrac12\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \chi_1(A_n^{(k)})\leq2. \tag{5}

At every positive depth there is a complete newest-coordinate cycle; its distinct columns sum to zero. Hence for k>=1 equality holds in (5). For example N_j=2^{j+3} gives P_k>=7/8 at every depth, so

χ1(An(k))=2(n≥1, k≥1),(6)\boxed{\chi_1(A_n^{(k)})=2\quad(n\geq1,\ k\geq1),} \tag{6}

while the seed rational coloring number n is unbounded. This disproves a universal small-loss difference-tower/rational-coloring comparison, even with arbitrarily deep towers and arbitrarily small positive total seam loss. A fixed-depth objection alone would be weaker. The bounded-entry line seeds all lie in a single valuation layer, so this example does not supply a uniform bound for those seeds.

4. Canonical coefficient-halving witnesses have a full-cycle obstruction

Consider the centered-cube lift from Section 5 of the difference-tower page. If an input coefficient u_v has |u_v|>=2, fix the other coordinates so that p_v=1. On this complete v-line its two coefficient values are ceil(u_v/2) and -floor(u_v/2), both nonzero. Thus the lifted support contains an entire coordinate-v cycle.

The coloring

c(v,g)=1{gv=0}(7)c(v,g)=\mathbf1_{\{g_v=0\}} \tag{7}

splits every coordinate cycle. Therefore it simultaneously splits every centered-cube lift whose input has height at least two. The even-modulus parity version has the same limitation. In particular the final genuine height-two-to-ternary step of this canonical flattening can never be monochromatic under (7).

This is a statement about those particular templates. A general non-cycle ternary relation need not contain a complete coordinate cycle, and (7) is not asserted to color all relations. The exact first-non-cycle height theorem remains valid: an algebraically non-cyclewise-constant relation may have support containing a full cycle. These are different notions, and a chromatic argument cannot identify them.

5. A simple universal one-stage coloring upper bound

For every N>=4,

χ1(DN(A))≤2χ1(A).(8)\chi_1(D_N(A))\leq2\chi_1(A). \tag{8}

There is a more general and simpler proof. Let a finite loopless directed graph have edges labeled by seed types v, with at most one incoming edge of each type at every vertex. Associate a_v tensor(e_x-e_y) to an edge x -> y of type v. For this indexed family B,

η(B)≥12η(A),χ1(B)≤2χ1(A).(9)\eta(B)\geq\tfrac12\eta(A),\qquad \chi_1(B)\leq2\chi_1(A). \tag{9}

For extraction, a uniform random strict total order retains each edge with probability one half when only forward edges are kept. The retained DAG has distinct incoming types at each head. Extract at each head and use the maximal-vertex argument. This proves the first bound.

For coloring, fix a proper base coloring with q colors and any strict vertex order. Split all edges into forward and backward arcs, retaining their original orientations. Forward arcs form a DAG in the chosen order; backward arcs form a DAG in the opposite order. Pair this bit with the base color. Within each part, a maximal supported vertex in a hypothetical relation has only incoming active arcs, of distinct types in a dissociated base color. Their row equation forces all their coefficients zero, a contradiction. This proves the second bound. No outdegree restriction is used.

Difference tori and arbitrary loopless permutation differences are special cases. Thus even the latter have the factor two, not a factor three from cycle edge coloring. Permutation cycles of length at least three ensure no repeated or antipodal same-type column labels. For a fully dissociated seed, any such nonempty permutation family has coloring number exactly two: a complete type cycle supplies the lower bound.

More generally, if a distribution of acyclic deletions removes each edge with probability at most epsilon, the first bound improves to eta(B)>=(1-epsilon)eta(A). The phase proof similarly gives rho(B)>=(1-epsilon)rho(A)-epsilon. These extraction improvements do not remove the displayed chromatic upper bound.

6. Scope of what survives

The uniform extraction theorem is unconditional. What remains sufficient is a prechosen small-loss tower on suitable varying, non-valuation-separated seeds with unbounded dissociated coloring under arbitrary actual colors. The ordinary line-cover target also remains open. Neither rational seed density nor canonical height flattening proves such a statement.