Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Three colors split every decomposable flat simplicial cycle


The theorem

Suppose k→∞k\to\infty, k<nk<n, and log⁡n=o(k)\log n=o(k). Eventually there is a three-coloring of ([n]k)\binom{[n]}k with no monochromatic support of a nonzero decomposable ternary vector in

Kn,k=ker⁡∂=⋀kAn−1.K_{n,k}=\ker\partial=\bigwedge^k A_{n-1}.

Here decomposable means one simple exterior product, not a sum of such products. The lattice identification is proved in the simplicial extraction theorem. This result applies at its fixed-CC critical scale. It does not color arbitrary flat cycles; it shows that simple-wedge supports alone cannot force unbounded coloring. The stronger two-color result for the smaller joined-boundary family remains valid.

1. Flat simple wedges give balanced TU matrices

Take a nonzero decomposable ternary kk-vector x∈Kn,kx\in K_{n,k} and an index II with xI≠0x_I\ne0. Change its global sign to make xI=1x_I=1, order II first, and normalize its Plucker matrix to

[Ik∣D].(1)[I_k\mid D]. \tag{1}

Every square minor of DD is, up to sign, a maximal minor of (1), by adjoining the appropriate identity columns. All are therefore 0,±10,\pm1; in particular DD is an integral totally unimodular matrix. Delete inactive extra columns, leaving aa nonzero columns.

Writing u=∑v=1nevu=\sum_{v=1}^n e_v, the cycle condition is ιux=0\iota_u x=0. If x=v1∧⋯∧vk≠0x=v_1\wedge\cdots\wedge v_k\ne0, the kk wedges obtained by omitting one factor are independent. The contraction formula therefore forces each ⟨u,vi⟩=0\langle u,v_i\rangle=0. Thus the underlying plane is in u⊥u^\perp, and its normalized rows obey

D1=−1.(2)D\mathbf1=-\mathbf1. \tag{2}

There are no zero rows, and a≥1a\geq1. The support TT of xx is exactly the family of column bases of (1).

2. Count of balanced TU matrices on one support pattern

Two TU signings of the same zero-pattern differ by row and column switches. Here is an elementary proof. A chordless cycle in the bipartite row-column support graph induces a square submatrix with exactly two nonzero determinant terms. Total unimodularity forces their cancellation; otherwise the determinant would have magnitude two. Consequently the entrywise ratio of two signings has product one around every chordless cycle. Splitting cycles at chords gives the same property on every cycle. Define vertex signs by multiplying edge ratios along paths from one chosen vertex in each component. Cycle products make the definition consistent and express each edge ratio as the product of its endpoint signs.

Fix one TU signing D0D_0. Every other signing consequently has the form

D=diag⁡(r)D0diag⁡(c).D=\operatorname{diag}(r)D_0\operatorname{diag}(c).

There are 2a2^a choices of column signs cc. For each, equation (2) determines every row sign uniquely if it is possible at all: the corresponding row sum must be nonzero and become −1-1. Hence there are at most 2a2^a balanced TU signings of a fixed pattern, and at most

2ka+a(3)2^{ka+a} \tag{3}

normalized matrices for fixed II and fixed active extra vertices.

3. Every such support has at least kaka bases

Let the bipartite support graph of DD have components with positive row and column counts kj,ajk_j,a_j. Their sums are k,ak,a. Bases factor over the corresponding blocks of (1).

In a connected component, choose one shortest path from each basic row to each extra column. A shortest path is induced. It has equally many row and column vertices and its induced square submatrix has a unique perfect matching, so determinant ±1\pm1. Replacing the identity columns for its row set by its extra-column set therefore gives a basis. Different endpoint pairs give different bases: the exchanged row and column sets recover the induced path, and hence its endpoints. Along with the original identity basis, this supplies at least kjaj+1k_ja_j+1 bases in the component. Thus

∣T∣≥∏j=1t(kjaj+1).(4)|T|\geq\prod_{j=1}^t(k_ja_j+1). \tag{4}

For k≥4k\geq4, the right side is at least kaka. For t=1t=1 this is immediate. For t≥2t\geq2, use

kjaj+1≥(kj+1)(aj+1)2,∏j(kj+1)≥2t−1(k−t+2),k_ja_j+1\geq\frac{(k_j+1)(a_j+1)}2, \quad \prod_j(k_j+1)\geq2^{t-1}(k-t+2),

and the analogous inequality for aja_j. Concentrating all excess above one in one summand proves the second inequality. It follows that

∏j(kjaj+1)≥2t−2(k−t+2)(a−t+2).(5)\prod_j(k_ja_j+1)\geq2^{t-2}(k-t+2)(a-t+2). \tag{5}

For t=2t=2 this equals kaka. For t≥4t\geq4, division by kaka and k,a≥tk,a\geq t give a ratio at least 2t/t2≥12^t/t^2\geq1. For t=3t=3, use k≥4,a≥3k\geq4,a\geq3: the ratio is at least 2(1−1/4)(1−1/3)=12(1-1/4)(1-1/3)=1. This proves

∣T∣≥ka.(6)|T|\geq ka. \tag{6}

Separately ∣T∣≥k+1|T|\geq k+1, since each basic row has a nonzero entry, giving kk distinct single-exchange bases besides the original basis.

4. Simultaneous three-color avoidance

Put

λ=12(log⁡2+log⁡3),Δ=λ−log⁡2=log⁡3−λ>0,xT=e−λ∣T∣.\lambda=\tfrac12(\log2+\log3),\quad \Delta=\lambda-\log2=\log3-\lambda>0, \quad x_T=e^{-\lambda|T|}.

Use distinct support events, not separate events for different orientations. For a fixed face II, the choice of aa active extra vertices has at most nan^a possibilities. Equations (3) and (6) imply

L:=max⁡I∑T∋IxT≤∑a≥1na2ka+ae−λka=∑a≥1(2ne−Δk)a=o(1).(7)L:=\max_I\sum_{T\ni I}x_T \leq\sum_{a\geq1}n^a2^{ka+a}e^{-\lambda ka} =\sum_{a\geq1}(2n e^{-\Delta k})^a=o(1). \tag{7}

Color faces independently with three equiprobable colors. A support of size ss is monochromatic with probability 31−s3^{1-s}. Support intersection is a dependency graph, and xT≤1/2x_T\leq1/2 eventually. Using log⁡(1−x)≥−2x\log(1-x)\geq-2x, its neighbor product is at least e−2sLe^{-2sL}. The asymmetric local-lemma inequality holds if

log⁡3≤s(Δ−2L),\log3\leq s(\Delta-2L),

which follows uniformly from s≥k+1→∞s\geq k+1\to\infty and (7). Moser--Tardos, Theorem 1.1, checked after its digest, gives the required coloring.

Review and remaining target

The normalization from real decomposability, the TU signing argument, shortest-path basis injection, the component-product edge case, and all local-lemma constants are author-recorded; a separate reviewer checked them. No computation or representation-theoretic theorem is used.

In the particular coloring obtained here, every monochromatic flat cycle must be nondecomposable. No claim is made about all colorings or all cycle supports. A color-adaptive nondecomposable cycle theorem would be needed to continue this simplicial route.