Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdős 699: necessary divisibility of the row at indices 4 and 5
P699 research · Erdős problem 699
With the original threshold , every bad triple satisfies
These are complete exclusions of the complementary congruence classes. They do not provide a last row for either entire index. Equivalently, for at least one of the small primes , the numerator factor has strictly higher valuation than every other numerator factor. The index-four proof is elementary. The index-five proof reduces every remaining possibility to 61 rational-slope cases and three candidate pairs, each with an explicit common prime.
A fixed-slope consequence of Lucas's theorem
Write for the part of supported on primes at least . For a bad triple with , every prime-power component of , , is active in . Lucas's theorem therefore gives
In particular . If in lowest terms, then . For any fixed , multiplication by gives
Indeed, for each prime-power component of , one factor is zero modulo that prime power, while . This argument does not require to be invertible modulo the prime.
At index five, the factor in requires a small adjustment. Put
Then
For primes greater than , the preceding proof applies unchanged. If with , then is active in , and Lucas actually gives the stronger congruence modulo . Removing one factor of is therefore safe in every case.
Index four
Suppose and . Then the -part of divides . Since , the reduced denominator of divides . The condition leaves exactly
If , then , so is coprime to . Equation (1) at gives , hence .
If , then . Equation (1), first at and then at , gives and . Consequently . The consecutive positive integers are both powers of , forcing .
If , then is even. Equation (1) at gives and . Thus the odd integers are powers of . Their difference is , forcing .
All three conclusions contradict .
Index five
Suppose and . Then the -part of divides . By (2), the reduced denominator of divides .
For each possible reduced fraction with , and each residue compatible with , choose such that
The retained integer checker verifies the existence of such a in all 61 cases. Now is coprime to , so (2) implies the fixed integer divisibility
Thus the possible arise from divisors of explicit constants, independent of . For reproducibility the checker chooses the valid minimizing . The largest constant is .
After imposing , , , and , , these fixed divisor conditions leave exactly
| Common prime of and | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 7 | 5 |
| 210 | 77 | 7 |
| 780 | 247 | 7 |
Each displayed prime has valuation exactly one in both binomial coefficients. Hence none is bad, completing the proof.
The checker uses only integer arithmetic and the Python standard library. Its certificate records all 61 choices and the three witnesses. It enumerates divisors of fixed algebraic constants; it does not search an interval of binomial rows.
python3 wiki/research/erdos_699/computations/erdos_699_indices_4_5_row_zero.pyWhat remains
The difficult configurations have a large power of or in itself. For example, maxima at and permit , with both cofactors unbounded. The reduced denominator of is then also unbounded, and the constants in (4) grow with it. The fixed-slope argument consequently does not yet make these remaining configurations effective.
An additional prime-power criterion at index four
There is also a uniform sufficient condition using the last two numerator factors. Suppose that prime powers and have and
Then the entire row is good at index four. Indeed, the primes are distinct because are consecutive. If a column were bad, Lucas would give residues
The consecutive shifts give an especially simple Chinese remainder representative:
If , this representative is . If , it lies between and , strictly above and below . If , adding puts its least nonnegative representative above . Thus none of the twelve residue classes meets .
This criterion uses the full powers dividing the two numerator factors, and does not depend on their other prime factors. A proof that such a pair exists in every remaining bad-row candidate has not been obtained.