Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdős 699: no exceptions at index 18

P699 research · Erdős problem 699 · Earlier effective reduction


Theorem. For every 18<j≤n/218<j\le n/2, some prime p≥18p\ge18 divides both (n18)\binom n{18} and (nj)\binom nj. Thus there are no bad triples with i=18i=18, with the original non-strict prime threshold.

The proof is computer-assisted. First, an interpolation certificate puts every possible bad row below 1070000010^{700000}, with all constants numerical. A finite prime-pair certificate then reduces the interval to n≤1037n\le10^{37}. The completed interval calculation excludes every remaining row.

1. A completely numerical last row

For each p∈{2,3,5,7,11,13,17}p\in\{2,3,5,7,11,13,17\}, choose rp∈{0,…,17}r_p\in\{0,\ldots,17\} maximizing vp(n−rp)v_p(n-r_p) and write n−rp=Ppupn-r_p=P_pu_p, with PpP_p a power of pp. The selected inputs differ by at most 1717.

The source constraints are the original BFT Theorem 2.1 table and 17 asymmetric estimates from the asymmetric cofactor lemma. Every latter estimate uses a published BFT Proposition 5.1 coefficient-gcd bound. The source checker recomputes their thresholds with directed intervals from the fixed parameters. Its output proves that all source constraints apply to the selected inputs once n≥101733n\ge10^{1733}. There is no unevaluated source constant.

Use the following line-factor and row multiplicities:

h=(37,34,32,29,26,23,19,15,10,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0),m=(71,71,71,71,69,66,66,66,63,58,53,49,44,41,38,36,34,31).\begin{aligned} h={}&(37,34,32,29,26,23,19,15,10,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0),\\ m={}&(71,71,71,71,69,66,66,66,63,58,53,49,44,41,38,36,34,31). \end{aligned}

Put

H(X,Y)=∏a=017((X−a)(Y−a))ha,Rxy=max⁡{0,mx+y−hx−hy}.H(X,Y)=\prod_{a=0}^{17}((X-a)(Y-a))^{h_a},\qquad R_{xy}=\max\{0,m_{x+y}-h_x-h_y\}.

The degree-130130 symmetric interpolation system for the residual multiplicities RxyR_{xy} has 4355 equations and 4356 monomials. The rank checker reconstructs its integer Hasse-jet matrix and proves rank 43554355 modulo the prime 6552165521; its certificate records the fixed system.

Thus the rational interpolation map is surjective. The nonvanishing lemma, using multiplication by X+YX+Y, supplies a finite family of integer polynomials of degree at most 131131 with these residual multiplicities and no common zero when X+Y>17X+Y>17. Multiplying by HH gives polynomials of degree at most 589589 with the required row multiplicities, one of which is nonzero at each physical pair 18<j≤n−j18<j\le n-j.

As in the weighted-ramp argument, the cofactor constraints yield finitely many minimal exponent vectors. The whole numerical checker checks all 123 minimal vectors and 11,932 collision-capacity cases. Since mm is nonincreasing, rearrangement covers every assignment of the maximal positions, including coincidences. The exact minimum gain is

∑tmt−589−∑tmtct≥52415000=1.0482.\sum_t m_t-589-\sum_t m_tc_t \ge\frac{5241}{5000}=1.0482.

The worst vector, in prime order, is

(.3472,.3290,.1990,.2270,0,.0370,0),(.3472,.3290,.1990,.2270,0,.0370,0),

with capacities

(1,1,.9630,.8010,.7730,.6710,.6528).(1,1,.9630,.8010,.7730,.6710,.6528).

To make the coefficient bound numerical, set

r=4355,C=r!(2⋅18130)r.r=4355,\qquad C=r!(2\cdot18^{130})^r.

Maximal minors and their cofactors give denominator-cleared interpolation sections with coefficients bounded by CC. The elementary integer comparisons

r<104,2500<10151,18500<10628r<10^4,\qquad2^{500}<10^{151},\qquad18^{500}<10^{628}

give C<10730000C<10^{730000}. The factor converting this coefficient bound to the norms of the nonvanishing generators is 1 668 679<1071\,668\,679<10^7. Also

∥H∥1≤18458<10576,(17!)71<101065,21+7⋅71<10151.\|H\|_1\le18^{458}<10^{576},\quad (17!)^{71}<10^{1065},\quad2^{1+7\cdot71}<10^{151}.

The weighted divisibility estimate consequently gives, beyond the source and elementary thresholds,

n5241/5000<10731800.n^{5241/5000}<10^{731800}.

But (10700000)5241/5000=10733740(10^{700000})^{5241/5000}=10^{733740}. Every source and elementary threshold is smaller than 1070000010^{700000}, so the recorded numerical certificate proves the exclusive bound

n<10700000.(1)\boxed{n<10^{700000}.}\tag{1}

2. A stronger bound on this finite interval

The prime-pair strip checker certifies all 15 pairs among 2,3,5,7,11,132,3,5,7,11,13, for gaps at most 1919 and input heights through 10120000010^{1200000}. Its complete certificate lists every exception to

max⁡(u,v)3≥min⁡(pau,qbv).(2)\max(u,v)^3\ge\min(p^a u,q^b v).\tag{2}

The prime-power ranges are covered by finitely many divisor strips; the certificate applies to all inputs in the stated height range. At row n≥73 516 023n\ge73\,516\,023, every selected input lies above every exception threshold. Bound (1) ensures that all selected inputs also lie below the upper height limit of the pair certificate.

For h=n−17h=n-17, equation (2) implies that at least five of the six cofactors are at least h1/3h^{1/3}. Otherwise a pair of smaller cofactors would violate (2). The checker uses the slightly weaker rational exponent .3333.3333 per selected cofactor, giving the uniform saving

γ=5⋅.3333=1.6665.\gamma=5\cdot.3333=1.6665.

Hence throughout the remaining bounded range,

U18(n)≤n718(n−17)1.6665.U_{18}(n)\le\frac{n^7}{18(n-17)^{1.6665}}.

Combining this with the retained fat-point and symmetric discriminant lower bounds reduces every possible bad row to n≤1037n\le10^{37}. The interval checker certifies the reduction using outward-rounded logarithms and includes the source threshold in the upper cap.

3. The completed interval exclusion

The retained prime-gap data and terminal-prime lemma exclude n<887n<887. The interval checker covers every integer in [887,1037][887,10^{37}] by 247,058 certified intervals. On each interval the Kummer valuation upper bounds, augmented where applicable by the local prime-pair constraints, contradict the lower bound required by badness.

The completed output records 494,115 visited intervals and minimum certified logarithmic margin

0.000028331945486687112311862842845207351396481308461874457>0.0.000028331945486687112311862842845207351396481308461874457>0.

It records the partition hash and, as its own run record, the names of the finite prime-pair certificate and the prime-gap data. No residual singleton or separate column verification was needed. Thus the entire remaining interval is excluded, proving the theorem.