Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Nonuniform guard fibres
Here means that every subfamily of at most seven edges has a transversal of size at most two.
The safe projection in Prime guard families assumes that omitted guard fibers have small transversal number, or that every seven allowed fibers have three disjoint edges in their common intersection. Neither condition is needed for the following -specific projection. Its hypothesis concerns each fiber separately. It does not provide an extraction theorem for arbitrary families, and does not settle Problem 644.
A graph on the seven row indices
Lemma. Let be a nonempty intersecting family of subsets of , each of size at least two. There exists a nonbipartite, 2-degenerate graph on such that every member of contains an edge of .
A graph is 2-degenerate if its vertices can be ordered so that each vertex has at most two earlier neighbors.
Proof. If , take the edge and join both and to all five other vertices. Every member of meets and has at least two points, so it contains an edge. The graph contains a triangle, and deleting the five degree-two vertices leaves just .
If every member has at least four points, take the disjoint union . Its independence number is three.
In the remaining case choose of size three and put . There exist and a pair for which . Otherwise, choosing different and complementary pairs would give two disjoint members .
Make a triangle. Give the two vertices of label , and give the other two vertices of the two different remaining labels in . Join each vertex of to the two vertices of different from its label. This graph is nonbipartite and 2-degenerate: delete the four degree-two vertices in , followed by the triangle.
If a member were independent, it would meet in exactly one point: it must meet by intersection, and cannot meet it twice because is a triangle. Every other point of would have the same label as that point. Since , the only possibility is , which was excluded.
Projection of arbitrary guard fibers
Let be disjoint finite sets. Let be a family of nonempty subsets of , and for each let be a nonempty family of subsets of , all of size at most . Define
Assume the following avoidance condition in every fiber:
For fibers of nonempty sets, this is exactly . Condition (2) also permits an empty guard edge, without needing a convention for its transversal number.
Theorem. Under (2),
Proof. A two-cover of any core subfamily covers its chosen lifts, and a global core transversal covers . Thus only reflection of needs proof.
Suppose fails . Repeat edges, if necessary, to obtain a bad tuple . For each point in their union, let . These missing sets are pairwise intersecting, since two disjoint ones would give a two-cover. Each has at least two elements: if it had just one, a point of that remaining nonempty row would complete a two-cover; an empty missing set would give a one-cover.
Apply the graph lemma to the , and order the rows so that every vertex of has at most two earlier neighbors. Choose successively, avoiding the union of the guards at those earlier neighbors. This union has size at most , so (2) allows the choice. Thus
The row spectrum of each guard point is an independent set of .
The lifted tuple has no two-cover. Two core points already fail on the original tuple. A core point and a guard point fail because contains a graph edge, while the guard spectrum is independent. Two guard points cannot cover all rows, since that would cover by two independent sets and make bipartite. Points outside the tuple's union cannot help. Thus fails , proving (3).
The coefficient two cannot be uniformly replaced by a smaller coefficient for all . At , take three disjoint singleton core edges, and let every fiber consist of the singleton guards . Each fiber has transversal number two. The lifted family has a global two-cover, whereas the core fails . This observation does not assert asymptotic sharpness as .
Limitation
The fibers need not coincide or have any common allowed edge, and their ground supports may overlap arbitrarily. However, the theorem only applies when every fiber satisfies (2). It does not show that a high-transversal family has a useful core--guard partition, or that the fibers failing (2) can be discarded with loss. Controlling the aggregate cost of such low-transversal fibers is still missing. Thus (3) is a safe projection criterion, not a rank-sensitive normalization or an unrestricted amplifier.