Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Minimum transversal exchanges


This investigates a different upper-bound route: organize the family around a minimum transversal and use exchanges to replace its points. The exact residual identities below suggest a Hall-type argument, but the subsequent construction shows that neither submodularity nor local accessibility follows, even after passing to a transversal-critical family at the conjectured three-quarter scale.

Write P7P_7 for the condition that every subfamily of at most seven edges has a transversal of size at most two. All families here are finite. Neither assertion of Problem 644 is resolved.

The proposed exchange reduction

Let TT be a minimum transversal of a family H\mathcal H, with ∣T∣=t|T|=t. For S⊆TS\subseteq T, put

HS={E∈H:E∩T⊆S}.\mathcal H_S=\{E\in\mathcal H:E\cap T\subseteq S\}.

Then

τ(HS)=∣S∣.(1)\tau(\mathcal H_S)=|S|. \tag{1}

Indeed, SS covers this subfamily, since every edge meets TT. If a smaller set YY covered it, (T∖S)∪Y(T\setminus S)\cup Y would cover all of H\mathcal H with fewer than tt points. In particular, whenever Y⊆V∖TY\subseteq V\setminus T has ∣Y∣<∣S∣|Y|<|S|, an edge satisfies

∅≠E∩T⊆S,E∩Y=∅.\varnothing\ne E\cap T\subseteq S, \qquad E\cap Y=\varnothing.

One possible replacement function is

rT(Y)=max⁡{∣S∣:S⊆T, (T∖S)∪Y covers H},Y⊆V∖T.(2)r_T(Y)=\max\{|S|:S\subseteq T,\ (T\setminus S)\cup Y \text{ covers }\mathcal H\},\qquad Y\subseteq V\setminus T. \tag{2}

It is monotone and satisfies rT(Y)≤∣Y∣r_T(Y)\le|Y|, by minimality of TT. A matroid-rank or exchange interpretation would be useful, as would a way of walking to a better minimum transversal through small exchanges. Both assertions fail in the strong form tested below.

A critical construction at the three-quarter scale

For every integer m≥2m\ge2, there is a family H\mathcal H with

K=4m+1,τ(H)=3m,P7,K=4m+1,\qquad \tau(\mathcal H)=3m,\qquad P_7,

which is τ\tau-critical and has the following properties. Its minimum-transversal graph under one-for-one exchanges has exactly two components, one an isolated vertex TT. Its replacement function (2) violates submodularity by 3m3m. Finally, any path from TT to another minimum transversal, adding or deleting one vertex at each step and remaining a transversal throughout, must reach size at least 6m−26m-2; this bound is attained.

Thus the required temporary excess over the minimum size is exactly 3m−23m-2, linear in the rank. These statements do not disprove the conjectured transversal bound: the ratio is 3m/(4m+1)→3/43m/(4m+1)\to3/4.

Definition

Put

p=3m,a=4m,n=7m−1=a+p−1.p=3m,\qquad a=4m,\qquad n=7m-1=a+p-1.

Take an nn-point core XX, labeled by residues in Zp\mathbb Z_p. Each residue has two core representatives; give an additional representative to m−1m-1 distinct residues. Thus every residue occurs two or three times. Write ℓ(x)\ell(x) for the label of xx.

For E∈(Xa)E\in\binom Xa, define

c(E)=∑x∈Eℓ(x)(modp).c(E)=\sum_{x\in E}\ell(x)\pmod p.

Take disjoint tag vertices T={zc:c∈Zp}T=\{z_c:c\in\mathbb Z_p\}, and put

H={E∪{zc(E)}:E∈(Xa)}.(3)\mathcal H=\{E\cup\{z_{c(E)}\}:E\in\tbinom Xa\}. \tag{3}

No primality assumption is made on pp.

The local property

The complete aa-uniform family on XX has P7P_7. In seven core edges the total incidence count is

7a=28m>4n=28m−4,7a=28m>4n=28m-4,

so some core point belongs to at least five of them. Any two core edges intersect because 2a>n2a>n, and a second point therefore meets the at most two remaining edges. The same core points cover the tagged edges. There are more than seven edges, so smaller subfamilies inherit the property as well.

All colors survive many core deletions

Lemma. If R⊆XR\subseteq X and ∣R∣≤p−3|R|\le p-3, then the aa-subsets of X∖RX\setminus R have all pp colors.

Proof. Set r=∣R∣r=|R|, U=X∖RU=X\setminus R, and d=p−1−r≥2d=p-1-r\ge2, so ∣U∣=a+d|U|=a+d. Let D⊆ZpD\subseteq\mathbb Z_p be the labels still represented in UU. Erasing a label requires at least two deletions, hence

∣D∣≥p−⌊r/2⌋,2∣D∣−p≥3.|D|\ge p-\lfloor r/2\rfloor, \qquad 2|D|-p\ge3.

For every s∈Zps\in\mathbb Z_p,

∣D∩(s−D)∣≥2∣D∣−p≥3.|D\cap(s-D)|\ge2|D|-p\ge3.

The congruence 2u=s2u=s has at most two solutions in the cyclic group Zp\mathbb Z_p. Thus this intersection contains some uu with u≠s−uu\ne s-u, giving two distinct labels in DD whose sum is ss.

Choose a set W⊆UW\subseteq U with one point of each label in DD. Since ∣W∣≤p≤a|W|\le p\le a, choose a fixed set F⊆U∖WF\subseteq U\setminus W of size d−2d-2. As two distinct points of WW vary, the sums of the dd-sets consisting of FF and those two points range over all residues. Their complements in UU are aa-sets with all colors. □\square

Consequently, any transversal using at most p−3p-3 core points must contain every tag.

Transversal number and all minimum transversals

The minimum transversals are exactly

T;C∈(Xp);(X∖E)∪{zc(E)}quad(E∈(Xa)).(4)T;\qquad C\in\tbinom Xp;\qquad (X\setminus E)\cup\{z_{c(E)}\}quad(E\in\tbinom Xa). \tag{4}

In particular, τ(H)=p\tau(\mathcal H)=p.

To check this, consider a transversal of size at most pp, and write RR for its core part and r=∣R∣r=|R|. If r≤p−3r\le p-3, the lemma forces all pp tags, so the only possibility is TT.

If r=p−2r=p-2, the remaining core UU has size a+1a+1. Its aa-subsets are obtained by deleting one point, so their colors form

∑x∈Uℓ(x)−{ℓ(x):x∈U}.\sum_{x\in U}\ell(x)-\{\ell(x):x\in U\}.

This set has at least p−⌊(p−2)/2⌋>2p-\lfloor(p-2)/2\rfloor>2 elements. At most two selected tags cannot cover all these edges, excluding this case.

If r=p−1r=p-1, exactly one core aa-set E=X∖RE=X\setminus R avoids RR. Its tag is necessary and sufficient, giving the third class in (4). If r=pr=p, there is no room for tags, and every such core set is a transversal because its core complement has size a−1a-1. This proves (4) and excludes every smaller transversal.

For a tagged edge based on EE, the core set X∖EX\setminus E has size p−1p-1, misses this edge, and meets every other edge: distinct core edges have the same size aa. Deleting that edge therefore lowers the transversal number from pp to p−1p-1. Thus H\mathcal H is τ\tau-critical.

Disconnected exchanges and failure of submodularity

Join two minimum transversals when one is obtained from the other by replacing one vertex. By (4), every minimum transversal other than TT contains at least p−1p-1 core points. Reaching any of them directly from TT requires at least p−1p-1 simultaneous replacements; in particular TT is isolated.

All the core pp-sets form a connected Johnson graph. Every mixed minimum transversal (X∖E)∪{zc(E)}(X\setminus E)\cup\{z_{c(E)}\} is adjacent to a core pp-set, by replacing its tag by any point of EE. These account for all other minimum transversals, so there are exactly two components.

Criticality does supply cliques of minimum covers: for an edge AA and a critical (p−1)(p-1)-cover CAC_A disjoint from it, the sets CA∪{v}C_A\cup\{v\}, v∈Av\in A, are minimum transversals. Here all the cliques supplied by CA=X∖EC_A=X\setminus E lie in the large component. They do not reach the isolated minimum transversal.

The replacement function (2) is also far from submodular. The lemma gives rT(Y)=0r_T(Y)=0 for ∣Y∣≤p−3|Y|\le p-3. Take any core pp-set BB and partition it into two parts B1,B2B_1,B_2 with sizes ⌊p/2⌋,⌈p/2⌉\lfloor p/2\rfloor,\lceil p/2\rceil. Since p≥6p\ge6, both sizes are at most p−3p-3. Hence

rT(B1)+rT(B2)=0,rT(B1∪B2)+rT(B1∩B2)=p.r_T(B_1)+r_T(B_2)=0, \qquad r_T(B_1\cup B_2)+r_T(B_1\cap B_2)=p.

The submodular inequality fails by p=Θ(K)p=\Theta(K), despite criticality, P7P_7, and (1).

An exact reconfiguration barrier

Consider paths of transversals starting at TT, with each step adding or deleting one point. Before the first tag is deleted, the current transversal contains all pp tags. Immediately after that deletion its core part must have size at least p−2p-2, by the lemma. That core part was already present before the deletion. Thus every path reaching any other minimum transversal passes through a set of size at least

2p−2.(5)2p-2. \tag{5}

This is sharp. Choose a residue with exactly two core representatives, and a set R⊆XR\subseteq X of size p−2p-2 containing both of them. Such a residue exists, since only m−1m-1 of the pp residues have a third representative. The set U=X∖RU=X\setminus R has size a+1a+1 and lacks that residue. The colors of its aa-subsets consequently omit some color cc, by the displayed palette formula above.

Starting from TT, add the points of RR one at a time, and then delete zcz_c. This remains a transversal. Add one further core point w∉Rw\notin R. Now the only core edge avoiding the selected core points is

E′=X∖(R∪{w}).E'=X\setminus(R\cup\{w\}).

Its color c′c' differs from cc, since E′⊆UE'\subseteq U and color cc was absent there. Delete every tag except zc′z_{c'}. This ends at the mixed minimum transversal (R∪{w})∪{zc′}(R\cup\{w\})\cup\{z_{c'}\}. Every intermediate set is a transversal and has size at most 2p−22p-2. This proves the exact threshold (5).

More generally, suppose each step adds at most qq points and deletes at most qq points, and every intermediate transversal has size at most p+sp+s. Before the first step dropping a tag, there are at most ss core points; afterwards there must be at least p−2p-2. Therefore

s+q≥p−2s+q\ge p-2

is necessary to leave tag containment. Sublinear slack together with sublinear-size exchanges cannot escape.

Even the singleton-trace layer remains large throughout the accessible region. For a transversal C=T∪RC=T\cup R, with R⊆XR\subseteq X and ∣R∣=r≤p−1|R|=r\le p-1, the edges meeting CC in exactly one point are precisely the tagged edges whose cores avoid RR. Their transversal number is exactly p−rp-r: it is at least τ(H)−r\tau(\mathcal H)-r, and any p−rp-r remaining core points cover all remaining core aa-sets. Thus o(K)o(K) local slack does not make that layer have sublinear transversal number.

A global choice is still different from an exchange walk

This construction does not obstruct choosing a better minimum transversal globally. In fact, maximizing

Φ(C)=∑A∈H∣A∩C∣\Phi(C)=\sum_{A\in\mathcal H}|A\cap C|

among minimum transversals selects exactly the all-core pp-sets in (4).

To check this, put M=(na)M=\binom na. Every core vertex has degree (a/n)M(a/n)M. A tag has degree at most (3/p)M(3/p)M: each (a−1)(a-1)-set has at most three extensions to a core edge of a prescribed color, so

adeg⁡(zc)≤3(na−1)=3apM.a\deg(z_c)\le3\binom n{a-1}=\frac{3a}{p}M.

For m≥2m\ge2, 3/p=1/m<a/n3/p=1/m<a/n. The classification (4) therefore proves the claim. For an all-core minimum transversal CC, its singleton-trace edges all contain the common (a−1)(a-1)-set X∖CX\setminus C, so that layer has transversal number one.

There is a small general observation in the same direction. In a τ\tau-critical family containing two distinct intersecting edges A,BA,B, a minimum transversal meeting every edge exactly once cannot maximize Φ\Phi. Take a critical (t−1)(t-1)-cover CAC_A disjoint from AA, and v∈A∩Bv\in A\cap B. The minimum transversal CA∪{v}C_A\cup\{v\} meets every edge and meets BB at least twice, giving potential at least ∣H∣+1|\mathcal H|+1 rather than ∣H∣|\mathcal H|. A potential-maximizing minimum transversal therefore has a proper singleton-trace subfamily, whose transversal number is at most t−1t-1 by criticality. This only saves one point.

What remains unproved is any substantial improvement for such a globally selected transversal—for example, a sublinear bound on the singleton-trace layer in the relevant linear-transversal regime. Even that would need a further argument to control the other trace layers. The exchange identities alone, submodularity, and small local reconfiguration do not provide the required upper bound.