Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Minimum transversal exchanges
This investigates a different upper-bound route: organize the family around a minimum transversal and use exchanges to replace its points. The exact residual identities below suggest a Hall-type argument, but the subsequent construction shows that neither submodularity nor local accessibility follows, even after passing to a transversal-critical family at the conjectured three-quarter scale.
Write for the condition that every subfamily of at most seven edges has a transversal of size at most two. All families here are finite. Neither assertion of Problem 644 is resolved.
The proposed exchange reduction
Let be a minimum transversal of a family , with . For , put
Then
Indeed, covers this subfamily, since every edge meets . If a smaller set covered it, would cover all of with fewer than points. In particular, whenever has , an edge satisfies
One possible replacement function is
It is monotone and satisfies , by minimality of . A matroid-rank or exchange interpretation would be useful, as would a way of walking to a better minimum transversal through small exchanges. Both assertions fail in the strong form tested below.
A critical construction at the three-quarter scale
For every integer , there is a family with
which is -critical and has the following properties. Its minimum-transversal graph under one-for-one exchanges has exactly two components, one an isolated vertex . Its replacement function (2) violates submodularity by . Finally, any path from to another minimum transversal, adding or deleting one vertex at each step and remaining a transversal throughout, must reach size at least ; this bound is attained.
Thus the required temporary excess over the minimum size is exactly , linear in the rank. These statements do not disprove the conjectured transversal bound: the ratio is .
Definition
Put
Take an -point core , labeled by residues in . Each residue has two core representatives; give an additional representative to distinct residues. Thus every residue occurs two or three times. Write for the label of .
For , define
Take disjoint tag vertices , and put
No primality assumption is made on .
The local property
The complete -uniform family on has . In seven core edges the total incidence count is
so some core point belongs to at least five of them. Any two core edges intersect because , and a second point therefore meets the at most two remaining edges. The same core points cover the tagged edges. There are more than seven edges, so smaller subfamilies inherit the property as well.
All colors survive many core deletions
Lemma. If and , then the -subsets of have all colors.
Proof. Set , , and , so . Let be the labels still represented in . Erasing a label requires at least two deletions, hence
For every ,
The congruence has at most two solutions in the cyclic group . Thus this intersection contains some with , giving two distinct labels in whose sum is .
Choose a set with one point of each label in . Since , choose a fixed set of size . As two distinct points of vary, the sums of the -sets consisting of and those two points range over all residues. Their complements in are -sets with all colors.
Consequently, any transversal using at most core points must contain every tag.
Transversal number and all minimum transversals
The minimum transversals are exactly
In particular, .
To check this, consider a transversal of size at most , and write for its core part and . If , the lemma forces all tags, so the only possibility is .
If , the remaining core has size . Its -subsets are obtained by deleting one point, so their colors form
This set has at least elements. At most two selected tags cannot cover all these edges, excluding this case.
If , exactly one core -set avoids . Its tag is necessary and sufficient, giving the third class in (4). If , there is no room for tags, and every such core set is a transversal because its core complement has size . This proves (4) and excludes every smaller transversal.
For a tagged edge based on , the core set has size , misses this edge, and meets every other edge: distinct core edges have the same size . Deleting that edge therefore lowers the transversal number from to . Thus is -critical.
Disconnected exchanges and failure of submodularity
Join two minimum transversals when one is obtained from the other by replacing one vertex. By (4), every minimum transversal other than contains at least core points. Reaching any of them directly from requires at least simultaneous replacements; in particular is isolated.
All the core -sets form a connected Johnson graph. Every mixed minimum transversal is adjacent to a core -set, by replacing its tag by any point of . These account for all other minimum transversals, so there are exactly two components.
Criticality does supply cliques of minimum covers: for an edge and a critical -cover disjoint from it, the sets , , are minimum transversals. Here all the cliques supplied by lie in the large component. They do not reach the isolated minimum transversal.
The replacement function (2) is also far from submodular. The lemma gives for . Take any core -set and partition it into two parts with sizes . Since , both sizes are at most . Hence
The submodular inequality fails by , despite criticality, , and (1).
An exact reconfiguration barrier
Consider paths of transversals starting at , with each step adding or deleting one point. Before the first tag is deleted, the current transversal contains all tags. Immediately after that deletion its core part must have size at least , by the lemma. That core part was already present before the deletion. Thus every path reaching any other minimum transversal passes through a set of size at least
This is sharp. Choose a residue with exactly two core representatives, and a set of size containing both of them. Such a residue exists, since only of the residues have a third representative. The set has size and lacks that residue. The colors of its -subsets consequently omit some color , by the displayed palette formula above.
Starting from , add the points of one at a time, and then delete . This remains a transversal. Add one further core point . Now the only core edge avoiding the selected core points is
Its color differs from , since and color was absent there. Delete every tag except . This ends at the mixed minimum transversal . Every intermediate set is a transversal and has size at most . This proves the exact threshold (5).
More generally, suppose each step adds at most points and deletes at most points, and every intermediate transversal has size at most . Before the first step dropping a tag, there are at most core points; afterwards there must be at least . Therefore
is necessary to leave tag containment. Sublinear slack together with sublinear-size exchanges cannot escape.
Even the singleton-trace layer remains large throughout the accessible region. For a transversal , with and , the edges meeting in exactly one point are precisely the tagged edges whose cores avoid . Their transversal number is exactly : it is at least , and any remaining core points cover all remaining core -sets. Thus local slack does not make that layer have sublinear transversal number.
A global choice is still different from an exchange walk
This construction does not obstruct choosing a better minimum transversal globally. In fact, maximizing
among minimum transversals selects exactly the all-core -sets in (4).
To check this, put . Every core vertex has degree . A tag has degree at most : each -set has at most three extensions to a core edge of a prescribed color, so
For , . The classification (4) therefore proves the claim. For an all-core minimum transversal , its singleton-trace edges all contain the common -set , so that layer has transversal number one.
There is a small general observation in the same direction. In a -critical family containing two distinct intersecting edges , a minimum transversal meeting every edge exactly once cannot maximize . Take a critical -cover disjoint from , and . The minimum transversal meets every edge and meets at least twice, giving potential at least rather than . A potential-maximizing minimum transversal therefore has a proper singleton-trace subfamily, whose transversal number is at most by criticality. This only saves one point.
What remains unproved is any substantial improvement for such a globally selected transversal—for example, a sublinear bound on the singleton-trace layer in the relevant linear-transversal regime. Even that would need a further argument to control the other trace layers. The exchange identities alone, submodularity, and small local reconfiguration do not provide the required upper bound.