Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Linear relation tests
This page identifies the exact scope of linear seven-row tests. It does not prove an upper bound for , or for the weaker combination of and Fano-freeness.
For a finite family of nonempty sets, let
Thus is monotone and . A relation is a valid seven-row test if no two of its words have supports whose union is . Property implies that applying to the seven rows of any matrix with columns in cannot give : otherwise choose an edge inside each positive row. Their spectra are subsets of the original column supports and still admit no two-point cover.
The exact formulation in Boolean reductions uses all downward-closed relations with this property. The following theorem shows what remains if one uses only linear relations, or their downward closures.
Classification of linear relations
Theorem. Let be a linear subspace such that
Suppose that has full support: every coordinate is nonzero on some word of . Then, up to a permutation of coordinates, is the binary simplex code. Its seven nonzero supports are the seven Fano caps.
If does not have full support, its test imposes no restriction on a function satisfying : a zero coordinate of produces an identically zero row of every input matrix.
Proof. First every word of has weight at most four. A word of weight seven violates (1) immediately. If its zero set has size one or two, the projection of onto has full support and must avoid the all-ones word, by (1). This is impossible: a full-support binary linear subspace on one or two coordinates contains the all-ones word. This excludes weights six and five.
There is a word of weight four. Indeed, each coordinate equals one on half the words of , so the average weight over is .
Fix a weight-four word , with three-element zero set . The projection of onto has full support and avoids . It must be the even-parity plane. To check this, a full-support one-dimensional subspace contains , as does the full three-dimensional space. A two-dimensional subspace is the kernel of a nonzero linear form. Avoiding requires that form to have odd weight; weight one would give a zero coordinate, leaving only the weight-three parity form. Consequently
Let consist of zero and all weight-four words of . Two distinct weight-four words have an even intersection by (2). Their supports, being distinct four-subsets of a seven-set, intersect in exactly two points. Their sum therefore also has weight four. Thus is a nonzero subspace.
If has weight , write for any nonzero . Equation (2) gives , while
For each of , these conditions force . Hence
If , all words of are supported on its unique nonzero word, contradicting full support. If , choose distinct nonzero . The three supports of have empty common intersection. Equation (3) then excludes every nonzero lower-weight word. Therefore : all its nonzero words have weight four.
Put . Counting incidences between coordinates and words gives
and hence .
Choose an identification . Each of the seven coordinate functions is a nonzero linear form. Let be the multiplicity of the form , where . Fix and sum the weights of the four codewords indexed by with . The form contributes , and every other nonzero form contributes twice its multiplicity. Since these four words each have weight four,
so . Thus the coordinates are exactly the seven nonzero linear forms. Each nonzero word has support
the complement of a Fano line.
Fano tests and binary subspaces
For , passing the simplex-code test is equivalent to the winning set
containing no set for a three-dimensional linear subspace .
Indeed, the seven rows of a matrix whose columns lie in the simplex code are the images of the seven nonzero vectors of under one linear map. If all seven rows win, none is zero, so this map is injective and its image is such an . Conversely, enumerate the nonzero vectors of any three-dimensional through a linear isomorphism from . Each coordinate column is either zero or a simplex-code word, producing a failed test.
Call this condition Fano-free. It is necessary for , not equivalent to . For monotone , replacing the simplex relation by its downward closure gives the same test: a failed matrix with smaller columns can be enlarged to simplex-code columns, and its rows remain positive.
Linear tests alone permit ratio one
For every integer , put and take disjoint blocks , each of size . Define
Each complete component has transversal number
Since the blocks are disjoint,
Nevertheless, its monotone winning set is Fano-free. Any three edges in one component have common intersection of size at least
The winning set of either component therefore contains no linear triangle : those three supports have empty common intersection, so they cannot contain three edges of that component.
If all seven nonzero vectors of a three-dimensional subspace won (4), color each vector by a component in which it wins. Every two-coloring of the Fano plane has a monochromatic line. For completeness, a line-free set has at most four points; if it has four, its complement is a line. To see this, three points of a line-free set form a basis of , and the only possible fourth point is their sum. Its complementary three points form a line. The monochromatic line in the supposed coloring would give a linear triangle in one component's winning set, a contradiction.
The family (4) fails even . Partition points of into three disjoint -sets , leaving two points. Choose an -set containing those two points; this is possible for . The four edges have empty common intersection, and hence require at least two covering points in . Adjoining any edge from the component requires a third point.
Exact scope
The classification and construction show that linear seven-row relation tests alone cannot imply a transversal bound: they all hold for (4), whose ratio is one. The same holds if all such linear relations are replaced by their downward closures.
This is not a counterexample. It does not refute a bound using Fano-freeness together with , since (4) fails . The full promise-relation formulation includes nonlinear relations and retains constraints absent from the linear tests.