Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Equal three blocks
Theorem. Suppose a -uniform family is invariant under arbitrary permutations within three blocks, each of size . For , the local two-point property for at most seven edges implies
The same assertion holds for the property on exactly seven distinct edges: a family violating (1) has more than seven edges, so any smaller bad subfamily extends to seven.
This deals with ground size , outside the range of the general many-block bound in Block-profile families. It does not settle unrestricted three-block families or either assertion of Problem 644.
A continuous lemma
For a finite nonempty set of profiles satisfying
write for the infimum of over deletions for which no satisfies for every .
Lemma. If
then seven profiles from , allowing repetitions, have a weighted realization within three blocks of capacity in which no pair of points covers the seven rows. Before deleting excess incidences, this realization uses at most seven support classes per block.
Use the seven Fano caps as allowable point spectra. The Fano-cap covering formula says that demands in one block can be realized within capacity , with at most seven covering classes before trimming, provided
Subsets of caps remain allowable spectra. No two such spectra cover all seven rows.
If some profile satisfies for every , deletion has total mass . Hence there is a profile . Put profile on one Fano line and on its complementary cap. In block , weight that cap by , and each of the six other caps by . These cover the row demands with total mass
Trimming excess incidences gives the desired realization.
Otherwise every profile has a coordinate exceeding . Since , it has exactly one such coordinate; call this its type. For every represented type , let be the minimum th coordinate of a profile of that type, and choose a minimizing profile . Deleting just more than from each represented type's block removes all profiles, so
With only one or two represented types, the right side is less than . Thus all three types occur. Relabel them so that
Every off-type coordinate of is at most .
Put profile on one Fano point, and profiles on two complementary triples of the other six points, neither triple being a line. For instance, with Fano lines
use the three type classes . We verify (3) separately in every coordinate.
The maximum individual demand is at most . A line containing no row of a coordinate's own type has demand less than . A line containing exactly one such row has demand at most
where (5) gives . No type class contains a line. A line with two own-type rows can therefore involve only type 2 or 3; its demand is at most
using . These inequalities use only .
The total demands in coordinates 1, 2, and 3, respectively, satisfy
For the first inequality use ; for the middle one use . The outer two require only , and the middle one requires . This proves (3), hence the lemma.
In the special case , the no-light-profile argument works already under : equation (4) then gives , and the same line and total estimates apply. The light-profile case above still uses the threshold .
Finite rounding
Suppose (1) fails. Reserve seven points in each of the three blocks and let consist of the edges disjoint from these 21 points. Then
The family is invariant within its three remaining blocks, each of size .
Let be its integer profiles divided by , and put . Any real deletion in these remaining blocks which removes all allowed profiles can be rounded up separately in each block. The resulting integer deletion still removes every edge, with increase less than three in total size. Consequently
For , we have , so the continuous lemma applies.
Scale its weighted covering construction by . In each block its at most seven cap weights have total at most . Round each weight upward to an integer. The resulting at most seven extra points fit in the reserved points of that block. Every row's block degree is now at least its specified integer profile coordinate. Delete excess incidences, separately for each row and block, until all degrees agree with their specified profiles.
Each resulting row is an edge of , by block invariance. Every point spectrum is a subset of a Fano cap, so no pair covers the rows. Removing repeated rows, if any, leaves a bad subfamily of at most seven distinct edges, a contradiction.
Scope
The proof uses full invariance within each block and constructs new edges from allowed profiles. It cannot be applied merely because an arbitrary family has three reference blocks. The constants are not optimized. No counterexample among general three-or-more-block profile families has been established.