Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Equal three blocks


Theorem. Suppose a kk-uniform family H\mathcal H is invariant under arbitrary permutations within three blocks, each of size kk. For k≥62k\ge62, the local two-point property for at most seven edges implies

τ(H)≤3k4+24.(1)\tau(\mathcal H)\le\frac{3k}{4}+24. \tag{1}

The same assertion holds for the property on exactly seven distinct edges: a family violating (1) has more than seven edges, so any smaller bad subfamily extends to seven.

This deals with ground size 3k3k, outside the range n≤9k/4+o(k)n\le9k/4+o(k) of the general many-block bound in Block-profile families. It does not settle unrestricted three-block families or either assertion of Problem 644.

A continuous lemma

For a finite nonempty set SS of profiles a=(a1,a2,a3)a=(a_1,a_2,a_3) satisfying

aj∈[0,c],a1+a2+a3=1,a_j\in[0,c],\qquad a_1+a_2+a_3=1,

write T(S;c)T(S;c) for the infimum of d1+d2+d3d_1+d_2+d_3 over deletions 0≤dj≤c0\le d_j\le c for which no a∈Sa\in S satisfies aj≤c−dja_j\le c-d_j for every jj.

Lemma. If

3944≤c≤98,T(S;c)>34,(2)\frac{39}{44}\le c\le\frac98, \qquad T(S;c)>\frac34, \tag{2}

then seven profiles from SS, allowing repetitions, have a weighted realization within three blocks of capacity cc in which no pair of points covers the seven rows. Before deleting excess incidences, this realization uses at most seven support classes per block.

Use the seven Fano caps as allowable point spectra. The Fano-cap covering formula says that demands q1,…,q7q_1,\ldots,q_7 in one block can be realized within capacity cc, with at most seven covering classes before trimming, provided

max⁡iqi≤c,∑i∈Lqi≤2cfor every Fano line L,∑iqi≤4c.(3)\max_iq_i\le c,\qquad \sum_{i\in L}q_i\le2c\quad\text{for every Fano line }L, \qquad \sum_iq_i\le4c. \tag{3}

Subsets of caps remain allowable spectra. No two such spectra cover all seven rows.

If some profile BB satisfies Bj≤2c/3B_j\le2c/3 for every jj, deletion 3B/43B/4 has total mass 3/43/4. Hence there is a profile A≤c1−3B/4A\le c\mathbf1-3B/4. Put profile BB on one Fano line and AA on its complementary cap. In block jj, weight that cap by max⁡(Aj−3Bj/4,0)\max(A_j-3B_j/4,0), and each of the six other caps by Bj/4B_j/4. These cover the row demands with total mass

max⁡{Aj+3Bj/4, 3Bj/2}≤c.\max\{A_j+3B_j/4,\ 3B_j/2\}\le c.

Trimming excess incidences gives the desired realization.

Otherwise every profile has a coordinate exceeding 2c/32c/3. Since c>3/4c>3/4, it has exactly one such coordinate; call this its type. For every represented type ii, let hih_i be the minimum iith coordinate of a profile of that type, and choose a minimizing profile AiA^i. Deleting just more than c−hic-h_i from each represented type's block removes all profiles, so

T(S;c)≤∑i represented(c−hi).(4)T(S;c)\le\sum_{i\text{ represented}}(c-h_i). \tag{4}

With only one or two represented types, the right side is less than 2c/3≤3/42c/3\le3/4. Thus all three types occur. Relabel them so that

1≥h1≥h2≥h3>2c3,H:=h1+h2+h3<3c−34.(5)1\ge h_1\ge h_2\ge h_3>\frac{2c}{3}, \qquad H:=h_1+h_2+h_3<3c-\frac34. \tag{5}

Every off-type coordinate of AiA^i is at most 1−hi1-h_i.

Put profile A1A^1 on one Fano point, and profiles A2,A3A^2,A^3 on two complementary triples of the other six points, neither triple being a line. For instance, with Fano lines

123, 145, 167, 246, 257, 347, 356,123,\ 145,\ 167,\ 246,\ 257,\ 347,\ 356,

use the three type classes {1},{2,3,4},{5,6,7}\{1\},\{2,3,4\},\{5,6,7\}. We verify (3) separately in every coordinate.

The maximum individual demand is at most cc. A line containing no row of a coordinate's own type has demand less than 3−2c≤2c3-2c\le2c. A line containing exactly one such row has demand at most

h1+2(1−h3)<c3+54≤2c,h_1+2(1-h_3) <\frac c3+\frac54\le2c,

where (5) gives h1<3c−3/4−2h3h_1<3c-3/4-2h_3. No type class contains a line. A line with two own-type rows can therefore involve only type 2 or 3; its demand is at most

2h2+1−h3<5c3+14≤2c,2h_2+1-h_3 <\frac{5c}{3}+\frac14\le2c,

using 2h2+h3≤H<3c−3/42h_2+h_3\le H<3c-3/4. These inequalities use only c≥3/4c\ge3/4.

The total demands in coordinates 1, 2, and 3, respectively, satisfy

Q1≤h1+3(1−h2)+3(1−h3)<6−3c≤4c,Q2≤3h2+(1−h1)+3(1−h3)≤4+2h2−3h3<134+c3≤4c,Q3≤3h3+(1−h1)+3(1−h2)≤4−h1<4−2c3≤4c.\begin{aligned} Q_1&\le h_1+3(1-h_2)+3(1-h_3) <6-3c\le4c,\\ Q_2&\le3h_2+(1-h_1)+3(1-h_3) \le4+2h_2-3h_3 <\frac{13}{4}+\frac c3\le4c,\\ Q_3&\le3h_3+(1-h_1)+3(1-h_2) \le4-h_1<4-\frac{2c}{3}\le4c. \end{aligned}

For the first inequality use h1≤ch_1\le c; for the middle one use 2h2≤H−h32h_2\le H-h_3. The outer two require only c≥6/7c\ge6/7, and the middle one requires c≥39/44c\ge39/44. This proves (3), hence the lemma.

In the special case c=1c=1, the no-light-profile argument works already under T(S;1)>2/3T(S;1)>2/3: equation (4) then gives H<7/3H<7/3, and the same line and total estimates apply. The light-profile case above still uses the threshold 3/43/4.

Finite rounding

Suppose (1) fails. Reserve seven points in each of the three blocks and let H′\mathcal H' consist of the edges disjoint from these 21 points. Then

τ(H′)≥τ(H)−21>3k4+3.(6)\tau(\mathcal H')\ge\tau(\mathcal H)-21>\frac{3k}{4}+3. \tag{6}

The family H′\mathcal H' is invariant within its three remaining blocks, each of size k−7k-7.

Let SS be its integer profiles divided by kk, and put c=(k−7)/kc=(k-7)/k. Any real deletion in these remaining blocks which removes all allowed profiles can be rounded up separately in each block. The resulting integer deletion still removes every edge, with increase less than three in total size. Consequently

kT(S;c)≥τ(H′)−3>3k4.kT(S;c)\ge\tau(\mathcal H')-3>\frac{3k}{4}.

For k≥62k\ge62, we have 39/44≤c<139/44\le c<1, so the continuous lemma applies.

Scale its weighted covering construction by kk. In each block its at most seven cap weights have total at most k−7k-7. Round each weight upward to an integer. The resulting at most seven extra points fit in the reserved points of that block. Every row's block degree is now at least its specified integer profile coordinate. Delete excess incidences, separately for each row and block, until all degrees agree with their specified profiles.

Each resulting row is an edge of H\mathcal H, by block invariance. Every point spectrum is a subset of a Fano cap, so no pair covers the rows. Removing repeated rows, if any, leaves a bad subfamily of at most seven distinct edges, a contradiction.

Scope

The proof uses full invariance within each block and constructs new edges from allowed profiles. It cannot be applied merely because an arbitrary family has three reference blocks. The constants are not optimized. No counterexample among general three-or-more-block profile families has been established.