Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Constant composition families
This page treats a class different from the uniform product layers in Arbitrary local layers: the entire distribution of local subsets is prescribed, rather than just their total cardinality. It gives an exact transversal formula and a proved three-quarter bound, with seed-dependent additive error, for every finite seed.
The conceptual proof in Arbitrary-seed coupling now establishes the polytope inclusion for every seed size. The earlier three-point exact rational computational certificate is retained below as an independent finite verification. No unrestricted reduction from arbitrary uniform families has been established.
1. The family and its exact transversal number
Let be a finite seed of size , and take disjoint, identified copies . For each , prescribe a nonnegative integer , with
Let consist of all subsets of the union of the copies for which exactly blocks satisfy . Thus the blocks may be permuted arbitrarily, but every local state has a fixed multiplicity. Every edge has size .
For put
Then
For the upper bound, delete a copy of in blocks. An edge avoiding these deletions would have to assign compatible states to all these blocks, although only compatible state occurrences are available.
For the reverse bound, let be a transversal, and write . An edge avoiding is exactly a matching assigning the prescribed multiset of local states to the block positions, with a state allowed at position when . Hall's theorem gives a set of positions whose union of compatible states has total multiplicity less than . No for is empty, since an empty deletion admits every state. Choose minimizing , and put . Then
This proves (1).
Delete unused seed points, meaning points belonging to no state with . This changes neither the family nor its transversal number. Thereafter for every nonempty . With
formula (1) gives the useful exact-error bounds
In particular, implies .
2. The finite Fano coupling problem
Index seven rows by the nonzero vectors of . Let be the downward closure of the seven Fano caps, where a cap is the complement of a Fano line. For ,
Indeed, their complements contain two Fano lines, which intersect. Consequently a seven-row array whose every point-spectrum lies in has no two-point transversal.
For a local array of seven subsets whose columns belong to , take its empirical distribution
Let be the convex hull of these finitely many distributions. Any seven edges of a constant-composition family that have all their point-spectra in give , by averaging over their blocks. Conversely, a rational has a rational convex decomposition; repeating its local arrays and symmetrizing the rows by an order-seven Fano automorphism realizes a bad seven-tuple at suitable multiples of the common denominator. The rounding argument below removes this divisibility issue under a strict transversal excess.
Here is a smaller sufficient polytope. For pairwise disjoint (empty states may repeat), put
Then . To realize a generator, partition the seven rows into a Fano cap of size four, a two-element subset of its complementary line, and the remaining singleton . Give the rows in these three classes the states , respectively. Every seed point has spectrum , or the empty set. Each lies in ; for , use the fact that a Fano line avoids any prescribed pair of points.
Define the probability polytope
The stronger inclusion is proved for every in Arbitrary-seed coupling, by a conceptual separation argument. In particular, a distribution with belongs to . The original verification for follows.
3. The checked three-point polytope inclusion
Finite lemma. For ,
Here are the full data for the nontrivial inclusion. Identify subsets of the seed with bit masks , in the order
Write . The polytope has 52 vertices, in the following 16 orbits under permutations of the three seed points. In the middle column, the displayed vector is divided by .
| Orbit size | Numerator vector of | Convex decomposition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 10 | ||
| 3 | 19 | ||
| 3 | 28 | ||
| 6 | 9 | ||
| 3 | 13 | ||
| 1 | 13 | ||
| 6 | 11 | ||
| 3 | 10 | ||
| 3 | 29 | ||
| 6 | 9 | ||
| 3 | 13 | ||
| 3 | 7 | ||
| 1 | 13 | ||
| 3 | 5 | ||
| 1 | 13 | ||
| 1 | 1 |
The displayed decompositions can be checked by direct rational arithmetic. The
exhaustiveness of the vertex list is checked by
evidence/main.py, using the
machine-readable version of this table in
evidence/assets/couplings.json.
The verifier requires only the Python standard library and the shared
failure harness.
For clarity, the enumeration is finite and exhaustive for the following reason. There are eight nonnegativity inequalities and seven inequalities in (5), in the affine space of dimension seven. The polytope has full dimension there: taking every nonempty coordinate sufficiently small and positive makes all inequalities strict. Every vertex therefore has seven linearly independent active inequalities. The verifier examines all choices, solves each nonsingular system with exact rational arithmetic, retains precisely its feasible solutions, and checks that the result is exactly the 52 symmetry images in the table. It also checks every coefficient, every disjointness condition in (4), and every convex identity. This proves by convexity.
For , add unused seed coordinates. Summing the singleton inequalities in (5) gives
An inequality involving at least one old coordinate is preserved when unused coordinates are added to its deletion set; an inequality involving only unused coordinates has left side at least one and right side . Thus the embedded distribution belongs to . In a convex decomposition furnished by the table, no positive term can use an added coordinate, since its state probability is zero. This proves for as well.
4. Integral realization with a reserve of empty blocks
The following argument also explains why a strict asymptotic excess cannot hide in divisibility or in local states of bounded multiplicity.
Assume unused seed points have been removed, and let . Suppose
Inflate every nonempty state probability by :
This is a probability distribution. Indeed, writing , one has
where follows by taking .
For a nonempty , its avoidance probability changes by minus . Therefore
Here was used. Hence .
By the arbitrary-seed inclusion and Carathéodory's theorem, write
Consequently
Each has a seven-block realization in which each row has local state counts . Take the local construction following (4) and apply all seven powers of an order-seven Fano automorphism to its row labels. For the binary labels used above, one such automorphism is the Singer cycle
It is multiplication by in , so it preserves the Fano lines and caps.
Use
copies of this seven-block realization, filling all other positions initially with empty blocks. For each nonempty state , every row has the same integer deficit
Moreover
At least blank blocks are available. A further seven-block construction corrects one unit of any specified : in block put in row and the empty state in the other six rows. Every point-spectrum is a singleton, so it remains in . Each row gains exactly one occurrence of . Thus all deficits can be corrected using blank blocks. All remaining blocks stay empty. Each row now has precisely the prescribed composition , while (3) excludes a two-point transversal.
In particular the construction works whenever
5. Consequence for the local seven-edge property
Theorem. Every constant-composition family with an -point seed and property satisfies
In particular, . For every sequence of these families with and fixed , or more generally ,
The composition may vary arbitrarily along the sequence.
If unused seed points were removed, apply the bound with their remaining number and use .
To verify the stated, nonoptimized constant, suppose . Formula (2) implies
Also and , the latter by taking any singleton deletion. Thus
The integral construction gives seven edges without a two-cover, contradicting . Repeated rows cause no problem: their underlying subfamily still has at most seven edges and no two-cover. This proves (12).
The large additive constant is only a convenient rounding allowance. The substantive finite statement is the arbitrary-seed polytope inclusion; no claim of optimal additive error is made. This remains a restricted-class theorem, since no local-property-preserving constant-composition completion of arbitrary uniform families is known here.
6. An arbitrary-seed constraint and its limitation
If , every pairwise-intersecting family of nonempty states has probability mass . For , choose a minimum-size state . Then , and a state disjoint from cannot lie in . Consequently
which implies the claim. These are necessary inequalities for : a disjoint triple contains at most one nonempty member of , with coefficient at most . They do not establish membership in .
The singleton inequalities alone must not replace the full hypothesis. They give , where , but this does not imply membership in . On five points, put mass on the whole seed, mass on each singleton, and zero on the empty state. Then , , and
Any disjoint-triple template containing the whole seed has empty states in its other two slots, so a convex combination with positive whole-seed mass must also have positive empty mass. The displayed law is not in . It has and is not a counterexample to , or to either assertion of Problem 644.